Some Thoughts On Hunter Biden, “The Big Guy”, and Those that Dismissed This…..

LexusLover's Avatar
Speaking of Hunter .... have the Russians found, tortured, and killed all the witnesses familiar with Hunter's bribes from Ukraine ... yet. I'm sure they've destroyed where the documentary evidence WAS kept ... but I heard it was moved to a less hostile environment ... not the U.S.A. I guess the Russian's mission has been accomplished so they're packing up to leave.
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
Simply put, that is all Hunter had to sell. You think he was hawking his porn habits, substance abuse or his keen intellect to Ukraine and China? He had a big one-trick pony to peddle. That is classic influence peddling and grifting.


Anyone else hazard a guess why all the Clinton Foundation and CGI donation went to zero after the Hag lost again in 2016? Freakish coincidence?!?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 04-05-2022, 06:10 PM


Anyone else hazard a guess why all the Clinton Foundation and CGI donation went to zero after the Hag lost again in 2016? Freakish coincidence?!? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Which is what will happen to Trumps campaign after he doesn't run or runs and gets clobbered.

The hypocrisy in you right wing loons is staggering
the clinton foundation wants to shepherd blm with its money handling
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 04-05-2022, 06:17 PM
And Trumps wants you to buy him a new plane!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Which is what will happen to Trumps campaign after he doesn't run or runs and gets clobbered.

The hypocrisy in you right wing loons is staggering Originally Posted by WTF
It doesn't even occur to them.

These aren't typical Republicans... they're the afterbirth of the Trump movement.

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar

i is prouds i voted for this idiot many times because joey doesn't "mean tweet"
Originally Posted by Yssup Hummer

and it only took you six days to fill out all those ballots ... impressive! of course your "illegal amigos" did the work you just "supervised"



bahahhhahaaaaaaaa
HedonistForever's Avatar
You have no clue what the fuck you’re talking about Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Yep, that's exactly what you said to me when I said Rittenhouse will be acquitted of murder.


You made a fool of yourself with your prediction and I understand you still haven't gotten over it yet. And when this whole sad story comes to an end when this transcript and other evidence, gets Biden impeached.



Take a pill counselor.
HedonistForever's Avatar
I read through the Biden impeachment. You'd think Hunter was president after reading through it. So stupid. Originally Posted by royamcr

You did?


You you mind posting it so we can all read about the Biden impeachment? How the hell did I miss that?
eccieuser9500's Avatar
You did?


You you mind posting it so we can all read about the Biden impeachment? How the hell did I miss that? Originally Posted by HedonistForever
Summary:



H.Res.57 - Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.



https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-...-resolution/57



This resolution impeaches President Joseph Robinette Biden for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Specifically, the resolution sets forth an article of impeachment stating that, in his former role as Vice President, President Biden abused the power of that office through enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors by allowing his son Hunter Biden to influence the domestic policy of a foreign nation and accept benefits from foreign nationals in exchange for favors.









You guys know he can't . . .

ignore me.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Summary:



H.Res.57 - Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.


https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-...-resolution/57


You guys know he can't

. . . ignore me. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

as a kindness to humanity Biden should not be impeached .. as a monstrosity to America he should be executed.



bahahahahaaaaaaaa
  • Tiny
  • 04-05-2022, 09:55 PM
Summary:



H.Res.57 - Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.



https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-...-resolution/57












You guys know he can't . . .

ignore me. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Introduced by Marjorie Taylor Green with no cosponsors. What a joke.
HedonistForever's Avatar
I scanned your transcript and don’t remember Bobulinski describing any substantive business he discussed with Joe Biden. Including corporate governance Bambino. I think he did ask Bobulinski to watch over his fucked up brother and his fucked up son. If I’m wrong please correct me.

And Biden is half senile. When you say he lied about the meeting what does that mean? He didn’t remember? Originally Posted by Tiny

Tiny, are you un-aware of the many, many times Joe Biden told us that he had no knowledge of his sons business deals and never met any of Hunters business partners?


This is only a single instance, there are many others, that Joe lied. Joe said the laptop wasn't Hunters. He lied. Joe said this is nothing more than Russian dis-information. The NYTimes and Washington Post has now confirmed that it was Hunter writing those e-mails and not Putin. Joe lied. And they just told us he lied and that's not a big deal?



Now, does any of that mean Joe did something illegal pertaining to that meeting that Bobulinski described? No, it does not UNLESS you want to include the MOUNTAIN of other evidence that supports what we do know about what happened in that meeting.


You and 1PerryMason1, seem to be taking the stance that as long as Joe Biden didn't say anything about a Chinese business deal and only asked Bobulinski to watch over his idiot brother and crack head son, there was nothing to cause Joe any trouble.


But you don't want to ask any more questions like "why did Joe go to that meeting"? There had to be a reason and I and millions of other people believe exactly what Bobulinski said, it was so that Joe who had final approval over all Hunter's deals, could vet the man that Hunter wanted to put in charge of the Chinese "pay to play" deal.


But I'm certainly open to a different story. Why would Joe Biden want to meet Bobulinski? You think that question isn't being asked by the Grand Jury now in session in the matter of Hunter Biden and this laptop?


Someone leaked from the Grand Jury that the question has been asked, "who is the big guy"? Why the leak didn't include an answer is a bummer but still, that question is central to blowing up the life of Joe Biden. If the Times and Post after hearing all the evidence presented to the grand jury conclude that indeed, Joe Biden was the big guy and had full knowledge of everything Hunter was doing and even flew Hunter to China with him on Air Force 2 to consummate a Chinese deal, Joe is done.


I think Joe is a dead man walking.



You also don't want to go there for some reason when the answer to that question could very well prove intent to corrupt. If in fact Joe Biden is proven in direct testimony by one of the other people in that room or anybody for that matter having dealt with Hunter and the grand jury believes it further proof not withstanding, it's over for Joe. How could he possibly survive that "hold back 10 for the Big guy".


I guess you are telling the truth about not following this story all that close because it seems that you are unaware of all the things Hunter says in those e-mails. Have you really never heard any of them? You didn't hear Hunter telling his sister to "just be thankful you haven't had to give dad half your salary for 30 years"? If true, did Joe report that money? The money Hunter says he gave his dad to make home improvements? YES, I know that each and every one of those things seems "circumstantial", but lot's and lots of circumstantial evidence has sunk more than one person.


And yes, the legal and the non-legal issues do get mixed up in all these discussions but a President doesn't necessarily have to have committed a crime to him impeach him. Joe Biden lying about not knowing what his son was doing, will sink him in my opinion.
You did?


You you mind posting it so we can all read about the Biden impeachment? How the hell did I miss that? Originally Posted by HedonistForever
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-...dL5aR6ccoGmkZs
What other mountains of evidence? Tucker doesn't count. Trump proved it is impossible to impeach a president so Biden can do whatever the fuck he wants. At least he isn't a dumb fuck like trump.

Tiny, are you un-aware of the many, many times Joe Biden told us that he had no knowledge of his sons business deals and never met any of Hunters business partners?


This is only a single instance, there are many others, that Joe lied. Joe said the laptop wasn't Hunters. He lied. Joe said this is nothing more than Russian dis-information. The NYTimes and Washington Post has now confirmed that it was Hunter writing those e-mails and not Putin. Joe lied. And they just told us he lied and that's not a big deal?



Now, does any of that mean Joe did something illegal pertaining to that meeting that Bobulinski described? No, it does not UNLESS you want to include the MOUNTAIN of other evidence that supports what we do know about what happened in that meeting.


You and 1PerryMason1, seem to be taking the stance that as long as Joe Biden didn't say anything about a Chinese business deal and only asked Bobulinski to watch over his idiot brother and crack head son, there was nothing to cause Joe any trouble.


But you don't want to ask any more questions like "why did Joe go to that meeting"? There had to be a reason and I and millions of other people believe exactly what Bobulinski said, it was so that Joe who had final approval over all Hunter's deals, could vet the man that Hunter wanted to put in charge of the Chinese "pay to play" deal.


But I'm certainly open to a different story. Why would Joe Biden want to meet Bobulinski? You think that question isn't being asked by the Grand Jury now in session in the matter of Hunter Biden and this laptop?


Someone leaked from the Grand Jury that the question has been asked, "who is the big guy"? Why the leak didn't include an answer is a bummer but still, that question is central to blowing up the life of Joe Biden. If the Times and Post after hearing all the evidence presented to the grand jury conclude that indeed, Joe Biden was the big guy and had full knowledge of everything Hunter was doing and even flew Hunter to China with him on Air Force 2 to consummate a Chinese deal, Joe is done.


I think Joe is a dead man walking.



You also don't want to go there for some reason when the answer to that question could very well prove intent to corrupt. If in fact Joe Biden is proven in direct testimony by one of the other people in that room or anybody for that matter having dealt with Hunter and the grand jury believes it further proof not withstanding, it's over for Joe. How could he possibly survive that "hold back 10 for the Big guy".


I guess you are telling the truth about not following this story all that close because it seems that you are unaware of all the things Hunter says in those e-mails. Have you really never heard any of them? You didn't hear Hunter telling his sister to "just be thankful you haven't had to give dad half your salary for 30 years"? If true, did Joe report that money? The money Hunter says he gave his dad to make home improvements? YES, I know that each and every one of those things seems "circumstantial", but lot's and lots of circumstantial evidence has sunk more than one person.


And yes, the legal and the non-legal issues do get mixed up in all these discussions but a President doesn't necessarily have to have committed a crime to him impeach him. Joe Biden lying about not knowing what his son was doing, will sink him in my opinion. Originally Posted by HedonistForever