Don't forget that Trump is a convicted felon

Only one number matters.



Suck it up, Buttercup.

34 time convicted felon trumpf Originally Posted by winn dixie

And still better than the best the Dems could find / create. They could have run a cardboard cut-out and got more votes than trying to convince us that Camela had more than 2 brain cells.

What? More voted for Trump than Camela 49.9% to 48.4% winning the electoral and popular votes.

So what. 49.9 still more than anyone else got, not sure what your point is other than trolling and playing semantic games.

Even if he lost the popular vote - Still your president. Even if he won the electoral college vote by only 1 vote or 100. Still your President.

All these left lunatics want to dismiss the electoral college because it didn't go their way. Most STFU after also losing the popular vote. Now it's not a "majority over 50%" Give me a break.

And... Still your President. Originally Posted by pertpvyztrzv

So a less than 1% victory is 'crushing the election'?
Less than a 1% victory and failing to achieve a majority of votes cast is an "unprecedented and powerful mandate"?


Playing the electoral vote?
Even Trump's electoral victory falls middle of the pack, looking all the way back to 1960...a solid win, but in the lower half of US presidential elections.

Again, hardly an "unprecedented and powerful mandate".

Yes, Trump won...but he did not receive his claimed "unprecedented and powerful mandate".

Trump did get the majority of the votes. He had more votes than any other candidate so he had the majority. Quit being a dumbass.

Trump did get the majority of the votes. He had more votes than any other candidate so he had the majority. Quit being a dumbass. Originally Posted by Budman

Nice insult...

Maybe take a hint from the dictionary?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority
a: a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total

In parliamentary procedure, a majority always means precisely "more than half"

The word you're looking for is plurality.

Shall we next discuss 'mandate'?

.... WON ALL the Swing States! ... ...

The American voters would surely rather have a "convicted felon"
running the country than ANY Democrat they woulda put up.

And, of course a few of us were tellin' ALL WHO WOULD LISTEN
for the last two years that Trump would WIN. ...

... The liberal lads need to remember - 'cause the MAGA's Won't Forget!

... WINNING! ...

##### Salty

Please support your work.

Did a majority of voters pick Donald Trump?

What percentage of the popular vote did Trump get?

Did a majority of voters pick someone other than Donald Trump? Originally Posted by RX792P

Oh. I so don't know why this is such a sore point for the maggies.

What? More voted for Trump than Camela 49.9% to 48.4% winning the electoral and popular votes.

So what. 49.9 still more than anyone else got, not sure what your point is other than trolling and playing semantic games.

Even if he lost the popular vote - Still your president. Even if he won the electoral college vote by only 1 vote or 100. Still your President.

All these left lunatics want to dismiss the electoral college because it didn't go their way. Most STFU after also losing the popular vote. Now it's not a "majority over 50%" Give me a break.

And... Still your President. Originally Posted by pertpvyztrzv

See? But it's coming....

So a less than 1% victory is 'crushing the election'?
Less than a 1% victory and failing to achieve a majority of votes cast is an "unprecedented and powerful mandate"?


Playing the electoral vote?
Even Trump's electoral victory falls middle of the pack, looking all the way back to 1960...a solid win, but in the lower half of US presidential elections.

Again, hardly an "unprecedented and powerful mandate".

Yes, Trump won...but he did not receive his claimed "unprecedented and powerful mandate". Originally Posted by RX792P

...

Trump did get the majority of the votes. He had more votes than any other candidate so he had the majority. Quit being a dumbass. Originally Posted by Budman

Oh, a Double Smackwich!

Nice insult...

Maybe take a hint from the dictionary?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority
a: a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total

In parliamentary procedure, a majority always means precisely "more than half"

The word you're looking for is plurality.

Shall we next discuss 'mandate'? Originally Posted by RX792P

And those silly maggies, donny is *OUR* president.

You know, like Joe Biden was. But you will be hard pressed to admit that, won't you.

Seems we may well be subtracting some felonies from the list. Like 34 less.

...The "offenses" actually were misdemeanors until Bragg theorized they were part of the furtherance of another, unidentified, crime, and that made them felonies. Experts called Bragg's machinations "legally creative."...

Basically the purported hush money payments to one Stormy Daniels.

Stormy, Then and Now:

A win for Trump: Appeals court makes key ruling in hush-money case
Says trial judge failed to adequately consider presidential immunity
By Bob Unruh November 6, 2025

An federal appeals court has ruled that a trial court judge failed to adequately consider President Donald Trump's immunity, confirmed by a Supreme Court ruling, in a dispute created by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg that claimed Trump's description of legal fees as legal fees was wrong in the so-called hush money fight.

Courthousenews said it was a panel from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that returned the case to Alvin Hellerstein a district judge, in Manhattan.

The decision revived Trump's fight against the Bragg-driven case that also featured a number of holes...

You might recall the bit where Judge Merchan was sending money to the Dem coffers, while his daughter was fundraising off of the trial.

You might recall the bit where Judge Merchan was sending money to the Dem coffers, while his daughter was fundraising off of the trial. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Really? You are that desperate in your hopes that your Fascist Grifter In Chief pulls a legal rabbit out of his hat that you revive this NINE MONTH OLD piece of shit thread with pics of a poorly-aged Stormy? I wonder how yours look these days....

$35 fucking dollars. Again, how pathetically desperate.

...$35 fucking dollars... Originally Posted by Mort Watt

You forgot to break down the $35: This included a $15 donation to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, and $10 each to the Progressive Turnout Project and Stop Republicans, all processed through the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue.

My fuzzy memory recalls the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct sets the ceiling for political donations at $0.00 for Judges.

I recall Loren Merchan raising 10's of Millions of dollars by "leveraging" the trial her daddy was overseeing.

Maybe he's just not familiar with ethics laws in his State.

Lies.

Lies. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

No, seriously, the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct sets the ceiling for political donations, including at the Federal level, at $0.00 for Judges.

Shoot-Howdy, Judges there can get censored just for endorsing a candidate on Facebook or for trying to intervene on a parking ticket for a family member:

...Matter of Richard F. Olcott
On May 16, 2023, the Commission determined that Richard F. Olcott, a Justice of the Elizabethtown Town Court (Essex County) should be censured for involving himself in the disposition of a traffic ticket issued to his son...

...Matter of Jennifer R. Nunnery
On August 9, 2023, the Commission determined that Jennifer R. Nunnery, a Justice of the Darien Town Court (Genesee County) should be censured for engaging in offensive and otherwise inappropriate behavior on Facebook and for improperly endorsing two candidates running for elective office...