House panel finds Obama and Clinton responsible for Benghazi errors

...as long as it's a coin purse, anything larger would be a waste of space.

ok, youre wrong .. heres the transcript

SPEIER: You said earlier today the lawyers at state told you not to talk to Mr. Chaffetz when he came. That’s what I wrote down. Would you just verify that’s what you said?
HICKS: We were not to be personally interviewed by Congressman Chaffetz.
SPEIER: Now, in your interview with the committee you were asked the question, ‘Did you receive any direction about information that Congressman Chaffetz shouldn’t be given from Washington?’ Your answer was, ‘No, I did not.’ Is that still your testimony today?
HICKS: I don’t recall that phrase. I thought that I said, and I’d have to review again, that I did receive instructions exactly as I said them, but I did not know who gave them to me because I did not have at that time have access to my e-mail from my time as DCM in Tripoli.
DARRELL ISSA: If the gentle lady could just tell us what page of the transcript that is on.
SPEIER: Maybe the staff can get it from me. I’m reading from a separate document.
ISSA: Thank you.
SPEIER: You did say that you were told to make sure other State Department officials were present for meetings with Representative Chaffetz. As you stated, they told me not to be isolated with Congressman Chaffetz. Is that correct?
HICKS: Yes, that’s what I mean by not to have a personal interview with Congressman Chaffetz.
SPEIER: So it was more about not being in a situation where you did not have other people with you, is that correct? As opposed to not being interviewed?
HICKS: Again, that’s what I said, not to be personally interviewed by Congressman Chaffetz.
SPEIER: Well, you said they told me not to be isolated with Congressman Chaffetz.
HICKS: That’s the meaning of isolated, not to be personally interviewed.


see how you silly shitheads leave out a few words to bend the spin so it fits your horseshit ?

and you and JD want accountability .. that's fukn rich ..

glad I could show the world you were wrong, AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN, day after day after day .. yer welcome btw. Originally Posted by CJ7

Good job CJ7. COF and Whirlybird are the kings of spin.

ok, youre wrong .. heres the transcript
Originally Posted by CJ7

Link? A credible one. I'd like to read it for myself.

Link? A credible one. I'd like to read it for myself. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

http://freebeacon.com/democrat-asks-...d-by-chaffetz/

Watch the video if you do not believe the transcript.


You can read it but I heard it. What happened was the admin wanted to make sure that the congressman did not spin the story to the right any more than they were going to spin it to the left!

But anybody that reads what the purpose of having the admin's rep there too, would have to agree that that was a prudent thing to do. Let me ask you this: Would the police let some Defense Lawyer dig through their evidence without somebody on hand to check wtf they were doing.

Thats fine, just like you I don't want to a bunch of copy/paste bullshit without a hard source link to back it up. And just like you have many times, I will ask for a link.

Thats fine, just like you I don't want to a bunch of copy/paste bullshit without a hard source link to back it up. And just like you have many times, I will ask for a link. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

just like WTF gave you


http://freebeacon.com/democrat-asks-...d-by-chaffetz/


complete with the testimony on video and the transcript .. of course your free to not believe you eyes and ears should you so desire ... I don't believe your eyes and ears either

Link? A credible one. I'd like to read it for myself. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

CBJ7, is correct in asserting that Hicks was never literally told not to talk with Rep Chaffetz (R), per his recent testimony. Hicks was told by HildaBeast's State Department not to be alone -- w/o their assigned counsel -- with Chaffetz during an interview. The Dimocrats, e.g.., Cummings and the rest, can equivocate on the literal instructions, but the intent behind such instructions are clear. Meanwhile, the Republicans are just as wrong for ascribing to Hicks words that he did not utter.

Yeah right. "What difference does it make" sure sounds like someone taking responsibility. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

blow job 7 wouldn't know about what it takes to be responsible to Hilary

blow job 7 wouldn't know about what it takes to be responsible to Hilary Originally Posted by gary5912

you better go lay down and rest, you've got to be about ready to pass out from intellectual stress ... that was truly profound for a 1st grader

you better go lay down and rest, you've got to be about ready to pass out from intellectual stress ... that was truly profound for a 1st grader Originally Posted by CJ7

fuck you

Intellectual stress? That assumes intellect!

It sounds to me like Hicks was ordered to not meet with Chaffetz alone. Isn't that I posted originally? So CBJ7 posts a transcript proving what I said was true, then claims what I said was false?

And you people think this isn't entertaining? BWAHAHAHAHA!

Obamatons! They're what's for dinner!

As long as they have a penis and scrotum, they're what's for dinner for you, Whiny!

Yosemite Cocksucker!

Obamatons may have a penis and a scrotum, but, as you have so accurately noted, Assup, they have no balls.

Then I'm sure this isn't a problem, either. After all, if Obama does it, it is only because it is the right thing to do:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

just like WTF gave you


http://freebeacon.com/democrat-asks-...d-by-chaffetz/

complete with the testimony on video and the transcript .. of course your free to not believe you eyes and ears should you so desire ... I don't believe your eyes and ears either Originally Posted by CJ7

Thank you, I missed that earlier. I was looking for a link from you, since you are the one that C/P the transcript.

It sounds to me like Hicks was ordered to not meet with Chaffetz alone. Isn't that I posted originally? So CBJ7 posts a transcript proving what I said was true, then claims what I said was false? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That is pretty much how I see it too. Not quite sure where CJ's panties are wadded up here. The buck stops at Shrillary's desk for her employees actions.