Well. We do have a grey area. No where does it say hobbyist can't do what you call Ads. You got a GL that stipulates they can't do it. One POV is they are sharing Information like the ecc*I*e says.With all due respect, Pb, Ads=threAds. They are the same thing. They are allowed to be posted in Coed just as those who don't agree with them are allowed to call them out on it.
And Whispers, regardless what the people of this site do, she IS serving out her ban. Don't link what these people do to her time being done. Can you prove she is creating fake accounts and logging in? Then you would have a gripe about her ban.
... Originally Posted by Precious_b
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=320362 Originally Posted by St.Christopher
Hey gang, on occasion I've seen staff take action on what is referred to as a "threAD" as though there was actually some sort of rule on this site disallowing it.
Well, there's not....and that's not an oversight.
ECCIE is threAD friendly: what this means is that no staff is to take action against any post or thread that someone considers to be a threAD. Don't move it. Don't point or suspend the poster. Don't warn the member in any way...PM or in a post. If someone RTMs a post referring to it as a threAD, simply let them know that we do not take action on those types of posts and if they want to let the OP know in a respectful way, go ahead.....but again, I do not want any warnings coming from staff unless instructed to do so.
With that said, if the members want to express their distaste on a thread that they feel is blatant advertising, let them...within reason. Just don't let it get out of hand, meaning insults or other violations of forum guidelines.
Thanks for your cooperation,
St. C
And Whispers, regardless what the people of this site do, she IS serving out her ban. Don't link what these people do to her time being done. Can you prove she is creating fake accounts and logging in? Then you would have a gripe about her ban.Pb, don't thinck for a second that she's not balls deep in what's going on in these threAds. True, she is serving out her ban, and I doubt that she has created any false accounts or signed-in under any fake handles. In fact, I'd wager that she hasn't. She has no need to do anything like that. She's got her little Slaves doing all the posting for her.
Originally Posted by Precious_b
Uh, she doesn't walk her SINK out in public... Originally Posted by Netx9
With all due respect, Pb, Ads=threAds. They are the same thing. They are allowed to be posted in Coed just as those who don't agree with them are allowed to call them out on it.
The grey area is that in the GL you stated, nowhere is it listed that the "Hobbyist" can not make the Ads=threAds.
Originally Posted by SofaKingFun
...And that should cause the Mods to do what?
Pb, don't thinck for a second that she's not balls deep in what's going on in these threAds. True, she is serving out her ban, and I doubt that she has created any false accounts or signed-in under any fake handles. In fact, I'd wager that she hasn't. She has no need to do anything like that. She's got her little Slaves doing all the posting for her.
... Originally Posted by SofaKingFun
Interesting theories... Note SL-s avatar change preceded Louigi's post by over an hour.... Here's another theory...I caught that, Netx, it's just that avatars don't provide the same sort of intel as do the images. Especially images hosted by those utilizing non-private accounts. Heh!
"Hey, G, can you send me a picture of you in a beer shirt? Our avatar thread is now onto the topic of beer." Originally Posted by Netx9
And that should cause the Mods to do what?Where did the mods come into this conversation? I was merely shooting down the theory that she was creating fake accounts as well as illustrating that this is within the guidelines; that being threAds and calling threAds out. Both legal. What's the problem? What did I miss?
She is in "lock down" for the lack of better terms.
And while someone is in lock down in a real prison, that doesn't stop them from writing letters and such. Some of which might drive people crazy. But it isn't against the rules.
Pretty slick if you ask me.
I didn't have to "wait for it..." very long Originally Posted by Precious_b
[FONT=Comic Sans MS]
...
Where did the mods come into this conversation? I was merely shooting down the theory that she was creating fake accounts as well as illustrating that this is within the guidelines; that being threAds and calling threAds out. Both legal. What's the problem? What did I miss?
.
.
Originally Posted by SofaKingFun
With all due respect, Pb, Ads=threAds. They are the same thing. They are allowed to be posted in Coed just as those who don't agree with them are allowed to call them out on it.It's rather simple SKF. As marketing pimp / director in charge of Slave G's personal appearances at social gatherings and all things public I just sent her a text requesting a T-Shirt with a "beer" theme. Slave promptly sent out photos. Pretty simple really.
Pb, don't thinck for a second that she's not balls deep in what's going on in these threAds. True, she is serving out her ban, and I doubt that she has created any false accounts or signed-in under any fake handles. In fact, I'd wager that she hasn't. She has no need to do anything like that. She's got her little Slaves doing all the posting for her.
Like this one for example. Do you honestly believe that this was a stock photo that Slave Louigi had stashed away somewhere?
If you do, then allow me to enlighten you on a few things.
One, you can get all sorts of brilliant nuggets of information from something as simple as an image, depending on which browser you use. ...even more with the various software and apps that are available. With some, all one has to do is right-click on an image, and then view the image's information....or fingerprints. Here's what this particular image produced..
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...pscuvwhxgx.jpg
From what I can surmise, this image is being hosted on Photobucket in louigipachino's account. Now notice the numbers which follow that account holders name. 2014-03-30& 18.34.53.
Now, I'll admit to not being the most computer savvy person in the world, far from it, in fact, but, even to a neophyte like me, I can't help but notice the remarkable coincidence that those first numbers happen to coincide with the date that image was posted here...and if I had to guess, the second set of numbers could mean that image was created @ 18.34.53 which is Military time for 6:34.53 pm....surprisingly enough it only took Slave Louigi a little over 87 minutes to get it snapped, uploaded and posted in this threAd. There's SO much more to this that I could post...such as the fact, that someone needs to turn off certain features on their cell-phone because they are unknowingly sharing excessive information (hint, hint!!!), ...AGAIN... but that would be getting a little too personal and SOME OF US do actually exercise discretion, besides, I tried cautioning that person once before and it fell on deaf ears, so I digress.
Same holds true for these that he posted too...
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...pstl8dmpgo.jpg
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...psslicc0qv.jpg
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...psv1pus00m.jpg
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...psrxczc7ks.jpg
But, no, Slave Guinivere doesn't need to create any temporary accounts or post under temporary handles or anything of the sort. With these suck-ups she's got in her corner, all she has to do is snap her fingers and they'll do her bidding for her.
It's really comical to watch them dance. I'm enjoying the hell out of it.
But don't thinck for a second that she's not balls-deep in what's going on here. That image above and it's info, prove that she's hand feeding this stuff to them and they're doing her bidding for her.
And what's even funnier is that in all of this nonsense and ridicularity the truth in one's true colors somehow always manages to surface.., if it's not already evident.
.
Originally Posted by SofaKingFun