What's Up With All The BBFS Request !!

but will wear a seatbelt. L

9 times out of 10, we don't need seatbelts. It's just that one time....yeeeeaaaaahhhh.

Am I making at least SOME sense here?? Originally Posted by Randall Creed

In my state driving without a seatbelt is strictly enforced. Paying the $50 ticket is not the problem, having your car insurance premium go up is.

Not a good comparison to make. The two things are totally different. Humans are hedonists and have a natural inclination to seek pleasure. This is why some guys will ask if it's available, despite the risks. There are at least three providers on EECIE that advertise that it is.

In my state driving without a seatbelt is strictly enforced. Paying the $50 ticket is not the problem, having your car insurance premium go up is.

Not a good comparison to make. The two things are totally different. Humans are hedonists and have a natural inclination to seek pleasure. This is why some guys will ask if it's available, despite the risks. There are at least three providers on EECIE that advertise that it is. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Whatever. Fucking for money (and paying the money) is illegal too, but that doesn't stop anyone. I also still see fuckers talking on cell phones while driving, not the bluetooth way but the phone up to their ear way. Illegal. Still do it.

Originally Posted by StopShort View Post
If I want a nice T-bone steak I'm not going to go to Chik Fil A and try to offer them more money to make a T-bone for me. It's not what they do.

Terrible analogy. That'd be like going to a provider and try to offer her more money to suck her dick. Originally Posted by FunInDFW

This was too funny to me, I had to reply.. cant even finish the rest of the thread. lol
His analogy seemed fine to me.. but yours... asking a provider if you can suck her dick is like going to chic fil a and asking them if you can cook THEM a chicken sandwich lol

This was too funny to me, I had to reply.. cant even finish the rest of the thread. lol
His analogy seemed fine to me.. but yours... asking a provider if you can suck her dick is like going to chic fil a and asking them if you can cook THEM a chicken sandwich lol Originally Posted by PrincessSlutFace

Hey, what about my seatbelt analogy? I thought it was pretty spot on.

Hey, what about my seatbelt analogy? I thought it was pretty spot on.

Originally Posted by Randall Creed

Driving the car without a seatbelt doesn't give me better orgasms though, or else I'd probably be doing that too!

This was too funny to me, I had to reply.. cant even finish the rest of the thread. lol
His analogy seemed fine to me.. but yours... asking a provider if you can suck her dick is like going to chic fil a and asking them if you can cook THEM a chicken sandwich lol Originally Posted by PrincessSlutFace

I see you have trouble with analogies. That's unfortunate.

I also still see fuckers talking on cell phones while driving, not the bluetooth way but the phone up to their ear way. Illegal. Still do it. Originally Posted by Randall Creed

When did that become illegal?

If tomorrow it was made possible that you could never again get pregnant or catch any kind of disease from unprotected sex how many providers would switch to allowing BBFS and how many Clients would demand it?

Its about weighing the risk vs the reward and the supply vs demand. If the supply of safe BBFS were to increase then the demand would go up.

I would say that the providers willing to risk the consequences' of supplying BBFS are doing so because they realize there's a demand for it and have decided that the reward out weighs the risks.

Now why a client would take the risk for BBFS I can't answer. You would most likely need to consult a shrink for that. But for what ever reason they have determined that the reward (pleasure) is greater then the risk.

In my state driving without a seatbelt is strictly enforced. Paying the $50 ticket is not the problem, having your car insurance premium go up is Originally Posted by flghtr65

Seat belt tickets are simple fines. They are not moving violations and will not make your insurance go up...

Is it a risk to not wear one? Sure... can you afford the ticket if you get caught? Then don't wear one...

Same with BBFS... if you think you can afford to pay the price if you get caught, do it...

If tomorrow it was made possible that you could never again get pregnant or catch any kind of disease from unprotected sex how many providers would switch to allowing BBFS and how many Clients would demand it?

Its about weighing the risk vs the reward and the supply vs demand. If the supply of safe BBFS were to increase then the demand would go up.

I would say that the providers willing to risk the consequences' of supplying BBFS are doing so because they realize there's a demand for it and have decided that the reward out weighs the risks.

Now why a client would take the risk for BBFS I can't answer. You would most likely need to consult a shrink for that. But for what ever reason they have determined that the reward (pleasure) is greater then the risk. Originally Posted by Marzz

25 posts in 6 years and this what come up with? Pretty sure it's obvious if you've used one and then not.

When did that become illegal? Originally Posted by Crock

School zones

25 posts in 6 years and this what come up with? Pretty sure it's obvious if you've used one and then not. Originally Posted by TheEccie214

2000+ posts and 2 reviews step up your game first dude then rag on people.

BBFS part of it. The ones too avoid are all open to advertising.

There is one more thing. The actual numbers from the CDC regarding HIV transmission rates:

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/estimat...behaviors.html Originally Posted by NeverMarry

Tards will fuck random strangers without a condom, but will wear a seatbelt. L

9 times out of 10, we don't need seatbelts. It's just that one time....yeeeeaaaaahhhh.

Am I making at least SOME sense here?? Originally Posted by Randall Creed

And 9,996 times out of 10,000 a guy doesn't need a condom to avoid HIV from infected ladies. I'm wearing my seat belt...

Lol. The thing is, you don't know where in the numbers that 1 may be. You don't get to bang 2,499 girls ina row and then boom, 2,500 is the one with something.

And that's the national average number(?). You could be in a concentrated zone, where the number could be, oh, 1 in 100.

But it's all good. Do what you do.

Have at it.

Analogy is mostly weak because the analog of one to the other is mostly based on many weak relations.

Better to stick to the actual scenario.

The probability function of contracting STD needs to be set.