Savannah Moon offered me BBFS

no moot point.. i've produced the proof and it's confirmed.. she provides bareback full service..

cum in it.. i mean come and get it!!! Originally Posted by honest_abe

Your evidence is not verifiable and thereby cannot qualify as proof. I don't know if you're full of shit or not and since this provider is not on my radar, it's irrelevant to me. However, your decisons and behavior in this thread is eroding your credibility. I know, I know, you don't care what I think and "I know you are but what am I?" etc etc etc. That's the behavior I'm referring to.

If you're not full of shit and you're doing the responsible thing and calling out a questionable provider, kudos to you. There is just no way for you to prove it irrefutably, so we're at an impasse.

So. Who voted yes on 5 today?

You got me there.

BBFS with a provider is bad, mmmmmmm k?

I really don't have much value to add to this thread, but it sure has been entertaining. But I will say that if a provider is really offering BBFS, we need to know because of the massive risk that brings into the equation.

Yes yes, some super smart fucker is going to point out that EVERY provider raw dawgs with someone. NO SHIT. But BBFS with a SO or even five SO's is a lot different than BBFS with a hundred strangers. And yes, yes I know that there is risk in every encounter...blah blah fucking blah. Level of acceptable risk is the variable in this game and BBFS with strangers tilts the balance and we consumers need to know.

Unfortunately, this site can never be a reliable conduit for that information. So we're arguing over a moot point. Originally Posted by hobbyist22

Well they THINK there smart because not EVERY provider has a hobbiest they will bbfs with. Cause I don't. To each there own that's why I use protection and I try to be as clean and careful as I see fit. I've had offers for way more money and not all money talks. Some of our lives are worth more to us then a few extra hundred dollars. And some off us have kids and SOs that were not trying to expose things too. So please don't assume.

Well they THINK there smart because not EVERY provider has a hobbiest they will bbfs with. Cause I don't. To each there own that's why I use protection and I try to be as clean and careful as I see fit. I've had offers for way more money and not all money talks. Some of our lives are worth more to us then a few extra hundred dollars. And some off us have kids and SOs that were not trying to expose things too. So please don't assume. Originally Posted by shayla84

I assumed every provider does BBFS with one or more SO's. You clearly do because you're pregnant, just as an example. I was trying to head off the suggestion that someone would have made, that BB sex with a SO carries the same risk as doing BBFS with a hundred strangers. Not even close.

Your evidence is not verifiable and thereby cannot qualify as proof. I don't know if you're full of shit or not and since this provider is not on my radar, it's irrelevant to me. However, your decisons and behavior in this thread is eroding your credibility. I know, I know, you don't care what I think and "I know you are but what am I?" etc etc etc. That's the behavior I'm referring to.

If you're not full of shit and you're doing the responsible thing and calling out a questionable provider, kudos to you. There is just no way for you to prove it irrefutably, so we're at an impasse.

So. Who voted yes on 5 today? Originally Posted by hobbyist22

so.. do you suggest hidden cameras..? maybe catch some dude on the raw dog down stroke with her..?

or do you simply wish to see the text message string where she confirmed that bbfs was okay with her..?

as a note.. everyone that has viewed that string has commented on it's authenticity..

as another note.. i have received multiple pm's from clients that have partaken in bbfs with her.. of course i would never divulge this specific information for public acknowledgment..

fact is.. she knows this thread to be true and the burden of disproof is on her..

so.. do you suggest hidden cameras..? maybe catch some dude on the raw dog down stroke with her..?

or do you simply wish to see the text message string where she confirmed that bbfs was okay with her..?

as a note.. everyone that has viewed that string has commented on it's authenticity..

as another note.. i have received multiple pm's from clients that have partaken in bbfs with her.. of course i would never divulge this specific information for public acknowledgment..

fact is.. she knows this thread to be true and the burden of disproof is on her.. Originally Posted by honest_abe

LMFAOOOO

fact is.. she knows this thread to be true and the burden of disproof is on her.. Originally Posted by honest_abe

images.jpg

In honor of you Mr Lincoln I have changed my avatar for ya



Actually Mr Chow say the burden of proof is on the accuser...that'll be you there Abester!
So far the screen shots have been called fraudulent, your rep is obviously tarnished...your credibility on the stand has and would be discredited in the Eccie court or peers...and your alleged other hobbyist who wish to stay silent aren't WKing you...
And the proof of anyone BB anyone has been you by your own admittance, screenshot and video.
You still haven't proven a thing with Ms Moon.

Now you still haven't answered my question posted earlier
Why are you promoting this Taboo and obviously have an attitude of apathy?

Problem with your WK's here on this thread is they see all these reviews you do and all the videos and pics and think to themselves you are truly a Eccie treasure chest of info and knowledge to them and they wish they could be like you
....when in reality lotsa reviews don't really mean shit.
It doesn't mean your smarter about the hobby, we've determined that and it certainly mean your good for the hobby, actually your a danger and nothing you could say or do will change that.
I do hope that this thread is being shared throughout the Midwest in infoshare, powder rooms and hell maybe the spider hole for all I know.



Mr Chow out Muddafukkas

haha nice photo.. you should direct that towards the dark side of the moon though.. anyway good riddance chow chow and have a nice life..!

[/QUOTE]

She's just claiming "fake news" trump style.

as a note.. everyone that has viewed that string has commented on it's authenticity..

.. Originally Posted by honest_abe

EVERYONE SAYS SO!!!


--DJ trump

I assumed every provider does BBFS with one or more SO's. You clearly do because you're pregnant, just as an example. I was trying to head off the suggestion that someone would have made, that BB sex with a SO carries the same risk as doing BBFS with a hundred strangers. Not even close. Originally Posted by hobbyist22

Of course with S/O when you're married isn't that kinda a thing. Lol I mean If men started one day wearing condoms with there wife wouldn't you're wife start asking questions lol. But with a client, that would never happen lol EVER!!! And being with your wife or husband isn't the same risk as being with a hobbies or a hoogars. Not at all.
But again that's my opinion.

Well Abe,
Thanks for transmitting the text pics. I’m highly amused.
But first,

you sir have been nothing short of outright rude and disrespectful towards me…. Originally Posted by honest_abe

Well Abe, you’ve entirely earned it all on your own.
You started this by actually asking gals for bbfs, and then you take exception to the issues and comments that arise due to what you start. Thus, all on you. And you pulled the same stuff on a non-eccie gal that’s been a regular in town for at least a couple years, who can’t defend herself on the eccie board.

As for this thread, and as to the text pics you provided. I have three comments.

First, has anyone (seriously anyone on this board), that’s had any phone call, text (other than what’s under discussion here), or any other convo with Savannah, ever known her to have a short brief response, to any comment or question?
My god, the gal talks, texts, emails, as if there’s a million minutes available in every hour. No way those texts are hers. Seriously, she is the queen of run-on sentences, paragraphs, novels, etc.
Authentic? Following your example of repeating something again and again: No way it’s her.

Second, I’ve been professionally dating for a while currently, and, once upon a time ago, almost a decade back then. In that entire time, not once have I ever seen, or heard of, an established gal directly texting or otherwise quoting rates and specific services to a guy she’s never met. Even longtime friends don’t do that with each other.

Third, the time stamps are highly questionable. Almost an hour? For a small handful of texts?
Every gal I know would cut you off after 5 min.

So three different, no way it's her comments.

And we are all well aware how spoof texts work. I am amused that your screen shots show that you had her # saved already, on a first & last text string.

So Abe, now that you’re a self-declared piece of work, the only question is what to do with you.
But the gals will handle that, not any of the guys on the board.
Btw, gals in Springfield, Ok City, and Iowa have also updated their dns lists.

EVERYONE SAYS SO!!!


--DJ trump Originally Posted by timmystool

yes i get replies though pm and text stating that the text string i sent is real..

of course she's going to state it's a fake.. she has no other defense.. but we all know the truth..

she allows bbfs!!!

Originally Posted by CaptainKaos

[/QUOTE]

thanks CK but this thread is not about me, it's about the dark side of the moon!

Abe,

You won't win this battle. Horse face has too many WKs in this limited market. They love ugly chicks for some reason and are willing to spend money to pay a brown bag special like her and even more willing to stand up for some crazy reason.

Do your self a favor and forget about the horse and her WKs.