What's the matter, snitchfuck? When FACTS are inconvenient, do you always just label them "lies"? Is that how you TRY TO "win" arguments?
Originally Posted by lustylad
He, like Munchie, only "win arguments" when they declare themselves a winner! In real life and on here, they can't.
But you're correct. They change their "facts" like the wind blows!
Their Flynn bullshit started out with them claiming the Judge signed "STANDING ORDERS" THAT were "IDENTICAL" .... NOW they are claiming the two orders the Judge signed are NONIDENTICAL(which is what I said when they were childishly posting about it), BUT they are claiming THE SECOND ORDER, WHICH HAS MORE PAGES THAN THE FIRST, IS REALLY A SHORTER ORDER that requires LESS! They can't even read "ORDERS"!
No one should ever forget when WTF gets into the criminal law weeds that he's the one who predicted Zimmerman would be convicted of "SOMETHING" in his prosecution for the killing of Martin! "Par for the course" on dumbass WTF.