When will I.B. quit being a liar?

Everything was spelled out for your stupid ass in the article,


Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No it was not and you know it. You are so full of shit and every time you try to elude making any factual comment about it just proves it. I have shown the math over and over. If my numbers were wrong you would have pointed it out.

"The chickens come home to roost" 0zombie King Reverend...

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Strzok was moved off Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation over the summer after the text messages were discovered.

Not that it had anything to do with this thread, I figured I would indulge you LOL!

No it was not and you know it. You are so full of shit and every time you try to elude making any factual comment about it just proves it. I have shown the math over and over. If my numbers were wrong you would have pointed it out. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the jackass so full of shit that you can't read numbers, factor and extrapolate, M T Brain Socket.

You'd be the jackass so full of shit that you can't read numbers, factor and extrapolate, M T Brain Socket. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Welcome back, IBIdiot!

You’re still the original DOTY!

NOW GO BACK INTO THE CLOSET WHILE YOU STILL CAN.

You'd be the jackass so full of shit that you can't read numbers, factor and extrapolate, M T Brain Socket. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I took your numbers and put them against the known facts. They do not add up. You took the 144% number and put it against the known population and came up with that number. My numbers show that there would have to be only 17.5 % of the population eligible to vote for your numbers to work. So tell me why is only 17.5 % eligible to vote?
We both know you can't and won't because you are a lying Pedantic coward.

I took your numbers and put them against the known facts. They do not add up. You took the 144% number and put it against the known population and came up with that number. My numbers show that there would have to be only 17.5 % of the population eligible to vote for your numbers to work. So tell me why is only 17.5 % eligible to vote?
We both know you can't and won't because you are a lying Pedantic coward. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

The U.S. Census numbers Trump your stupid-ass every day of the week, M T Brain Socket. You can take your ignorance and shove it up your illiterate ass, M T Brain Socket.

The U.S. Census numbers Trump your stupid-ass every day of the week, M T Brain Socket. You can take your ignorance and shove it up your illiterate ass, M T Brain Socket. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

LOL! I agree and they say you are a fucking liar. that is the whole point dotard. Your numbers are wrong by everyone's calculations.

No matter what number you use for the population there is no way to make it say what you are bullshitting us about.

But that won’t stop him from trying.

Then he’ll stamp his feet.

Then he’ll hold his breath.

LOL! I agree and they say you are a fucking liar. that is the whole point dotard. Your numbers are wrong by everyone's calculations.

No matter what number you use for the population there is no way to make it say what you are bullshitting us about. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the jackass steeped in bullshit, M T Brain Socket. You're the jackass that keeps quibbling about the numbers other than the "144% of the number of citizens of age to vote" as JW reports, M T Brain Socket.

But that won’t stop him from trying.

Then he’ll stamp his feet.

Then he’ll hold his breath. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You'd be the jackass that needs to save your breath for your DOTY victory speech, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

No, you would.

You'd be the jackass steeped in bullshit, M T Brain Socket. You're the jackass that keeps quibbling about the numbers other than the "144% of the number of citizens of age to vote" as JW reports, M T Brain Socket.




Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Hey Dotard! Your numbers are wrong. You are using made up numbers. The 144% does not add up to the known amount of voters registered. There would have to only 17.5 % of the population eligible for your numbers to work. So if you can prove that is the case I will let you touch my balls LOL! Just kidding. I will leave the forum. So unless you show how that happened you need to start your vacation.
And by the way, we both know you would love to see me gone so the only reason you don't is because you can't. Fucking Pedant!

And since you are so fond of the census here is proof youare wrong.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-...166187232.html

Hey Dotard! Your numbers are wrong. You are using made up numbers. The 144% does not add up to the known amount of voters registered. There would have to only 17.5 % of the population eligible for your numbers to work. So if you can prove that is the case I will let you touch my balls LOL! Just kidding. I will leave the forum. So unless you show how that happened you need to start your vacation.
And by the way, we both know you would love to see me gone so the only reason you don't is because you can't. Fucking Pedant!

And since you are so fond of the census here is proof youare wrong.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-...166187232.html Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the jackass that's too stupid to read and understand what JW published, M T Brain Socket. Suck it up retard, you were born to be stupid, M T Brain Socket.

You'd be the jackass that's too stupid to read and understand what JW published, M T Brain Socket. Suck it up retard, you were born to be stupid, M T Brain Socket.


Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Who cares what they published!The facts are the facts. On top of that they did not say there were that many extra voters so if we are going off there numbers you are still wrong.