Texas school shooting

eccieuser9500's Avatar
still playing with yerself? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid



Yes.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Yes.
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

the nurse will now escort you to the room for the procedure ..









Big Chief puts you out of yer misery







Big Chief then leaves



eccieuser9500's Avatar
the nurse will now escort you to the room for the procedure ..


Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid



It's in the book man!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixJ64re9vV0
Jacuzzme's Avatar
This guy broke 100 laws to do this and these guys think banning magazines and scary looking guns would’ve done something to stop it. It wouldn’t.

I’m no lawyer, but I think MURDER is also illegal. The dude didn’t seem to mind tho.
HedonistForever's Avatar
.

Man, do you not get it yet?

What makes you think there would be a Security Guard on site the entire school day?

What makes you think one guard could stop any massacre? Uvalde and Sandy Hook failed.

What makes you think one guard would be in the exact space at the right time, when a shooter walks in a propped open door?

You guys, um, slay me Originally Posted by Chung Tran

So what you seem to be saying is, this proposal of a security person "probably won't work every time". Yeah, a lot like rocket ships but we do it anyway because there is ALWAYS some degree of benefit.


If a shooter knew that every school in his state let's say, had guards but the state right next door didn't, where do you suppose he would chose to go? To much common sense? And if these young psychopaths know that every school has a guard or guards and everybody is diligent because we talk about how diligent we have become, that 18 just might go to a grocery store where any loss of live is horrible, but we keep the kids safe over everybody else. Damn the expense, damn the probability that it won't work EVERY TIME but we know it will work at the very least sometimes and wouldn't that right there make the effort worth while even if we are kidding ourselves, until that point in time and I can feel it coming, where we do get back to a society that does not, will not condone, tolerate what we see going on right now. And it doesn't matter if it's a 18 White, Black or Brown male.



So, because we "probably" can't save EVERY kid EVERY time, let's just ignore the FACT that it will more than likely work at least once and that once, may have been this group of 4th graders. 19 of them, 13, 14 years old.



There can be no excuse for not having a bi-partisan agreement on a first step forward. While I understand the "slippery slope" argument, sometimes ( and I think this one of those times ) this "sacrifice", of backing off the idea that we can't give an inch or we lose everything, needs to be made by both sides. A 21 year old restriction on buying an AR or similar rifle, seems responsible, it's certainly being discussed a lot and most of these lunatics seem to be under 21.



I would certainly think there are 10 Republicans that could swallow that and live through the 22 election.


The majority of the country ( I believe ) accepts the idea that we, the adults, get to put age restrictions on a variety of matters. Why should this be any different?
Michael8219's Avatar
I would agree in addition to more school security we should add red flag laws and enact ban on AR purchases by anyone younger than 21...

Of course we’re never going to stop all the evil bastards but you take away the guns from upstanding civilians then the bastards will still have ‘em. Founding fathers were smart bastards.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PmwhdDv8VrM

Where is Briscoe Cain (just kidding)?
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
No AR purchases for anyone under 21...even if they carry one in the military duties? Or police duties? Or they have an AK variant? Or how about if they want to commit murder with a more devastating weapon, the shotgun. The shotgun is a more effective weapon at close range and can be reloaded on the fly (meaning that you insert shells every time you pause in your shooting)
texassapper's Avatar
I would agree in addition to more school security we should add red flag laws and enact ban on AR purchases by anyone younger than 21... Originally Posted by Michael8219
I'm against the Red flag laws simply because the psych profession is whole sale liberal. What stops them from simply saying that anyone that wants to own a gun is crazy and thus cannot? Any subjective measure is worthless.

As for raising the age to 21... I'm fine with that if we raise the voting, draft, ability to decide what gender one is, tattoo application, ability to get an abortion w/o parental signature as well.

If we are now going to say adulthood starts at 21, then all the associated rights that currently start at 18 should be changed as well.

What's hilarious is that we say 18 is too young to buy a weapon but 5 is okay to be trans-sexual and start taking hormone therapy.
texassapper's Avatar
The majority of the country ( I believe ) accepts the idea that we, the adults, get to put age restrictions on a variety of matters. Why should this be any different? Originally Posted by HedonistForever
When does adulthood start? When do we judge someone old enough to sign a contract? If you aren't mature enough to own a weapon, then I sure don't want you voting either.
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
??
.

Man, do you not get it yet? <I sure as shit do. You can too>

What makes you think there would be a Security Guard on site the entire school day? <Who would think someone would spend ~$150K to clean up duck poop? Reassess priorities much?!?>

What makes you think one guard could stop any massacre? Uvalde and Sandy Hook failed. <FFS: They failed because they were not there. Sandy Hook is a worse story in that thy had invested in the latest high-tech security features, except a good guy with a gun, and they all failed spectacularly>

What makes you think one guard would be in the exact space at the right time, when a shooter walks in a propped open door? <A hearing test and a map of the school. Cost about $75. After that you only need one ranger if you only have one riot>

You guys, um, slay me <You should learn self-defence> Originally Posted by Chung Tran
bambino's Avatar
bambino's Avatar
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-28-2022, 08:33 AM
This guy broke 100 laws to do this and these guys think banning magazines and scary looking guns would’ve done something to stop it. It wouldn’t.

I’m no lawyer, but I think MURDER is also illegal. The dude didn’t seem to mind tho. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Ypo've missed the boat. They want to decrease easy access. We know drug laws do not work....but I don't see you wanting to stop more and more of those laws....same with prostitution
Jacuzzme's Avatar
Jacuzzme's Avatar
Ypo've missed the boat. They want to decrease easy access. We know drug laws do not work....but I don't see you wanting to stop more and more of those laws....same with prostitution Originally Posted by WTF
And what happened to gun crime last time there was an “assault weapons” ban? (Here’s a hint: nothing)