How many times are you going to "repeat" what he said? And why? Originally Posted by LexusLoverATTN : lexie lacking I did not repeat it.
![Mfr Lol](images/smilies/modern/mfr_lol.gif)
Yes in Houston....where there wasn't a huge bubble. Originally Posted by WTFOh! I "see" .... what you meant to say was ...
Wait a minute! STOP! ........didn't Obama say that Assad was the scum of the earth? Didn't Hillary say so as well? So now we are getting allied with the scum of the earth?
For some of you who can't comprehend how the situation in Iraq happened, let me lay it out for you.
When the war was over and the US had won under the Bush doctrine, Obama was supposed to negoiate a Status of Forces Agreement. Namely how many troops would stay behind to safeguard the hard won gains in Iraq. The military commanders (the good guys) wanted to leave 35,000 allied troops behind but Obama said NO. The military commanders came back with a new plan and requirement for 10,000 troops with a lot of neat equipment to support them. Obama said NO (and he hadn't even started to "negoiate" with Maliki yet). The commanders finally asked Obama what he wanted. Obama said 3,500 troops....the military commanders said it couldn't be done with so few. The option was presented to Maliki who said that 3500 would only piss off Iraqis but be unable to do anything. Thanks but no thanks. Obama hung his failure (and Hillary's) on the legal exception for the troops. He didn't even try to negoiate that. This is all Obama. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
The "community organizer" is a failure.I will add you to the growing list of members who are stating you do not care if our military can be prosecuted in Iraq courts. That legal immunity means nothing to you. Thanks for dismissing our military.
And now they want a "village idiot,"...
.... who thinks being worth $100+ million is being broke. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I will add you to the growing list of members who are stating you do not care if our military can be prosecuted in Iraq courts. That legal immunity means nothing to you. Thanks for dismissing our military. Originally Posted by i'va biggenLexiLiar is pro military as long as the Commander in Chief and/or the military personnel share his Tea Party allegiance.
LexiLiar is pro military as long as the Commander in Chief and/or the military personnel share his Tea Party allegiance. If they don't share his distorted political ideology, LLIdiot quickly becomes their biggest critics. Originally Posted by bigtexBigTtisLiar is at it again. Spewing fabrications to appear relevant.
(REPEAT POINT)Do you not see a pattern here? Again:
How many times are you going to repeat over and over the same thing? This is at least 3-4 I am not going back to count. Seeing you cannot move on after each point has been addressed and bring anything new to the discussion I'm not going through all this again. So now you can claim victory, and your mother will put a gold star next to your name on the fridge.
(REPEAT POINT) Originally Posted by i'va biggen
I didn't know your code name at the gay bar was Dorothy. Lusty Lass. Originally Posted by i'va biggenThat's your ego speaking. What the other poster was really saying, with that picture, was that you got bitch smacked. You got destroyed so bad that the only honorable course of action for you, and those on your side of the argument, is to cede the argument. By staying in this argument, the only thing you accomplish is further loss of credibility.
Didn't you read what he posted? The Status of Forces Agreement would've protected our troops from being held accountable in Iraqi courts for issues committed while carrying out US combat or other missions.
Wait a minute! STOP! ........didn't Obama say that Assad was the scum of the earth? Didn't Hillary say so as well? So now we are getting allied with the scum of the earth?
For some of you who can't comprehend how the situation in Iraq happened, let me lay it out for you.
When the war was over and the US had won under the Bush doctrine, Obama was supposed to negoiate a Status of Forces Agreement. Namely how many troops would stay behind to safeguard the hard won gains in Iraq. The military commanders (the good guys) wanted to leave 35,000 allied troops behind but Obama said NO. The military commanders came back with a new plan and requirement for 10,000 troops with a lot of neat equipment to support them. Obama said NO (and he hadn't even started to "negoiate" with Maliki yet). The commanders finally asked Obama what he wanted. Obama said 3,500 troops....the military commanders said it couldn't be done with so few. The option was presented to Maliki who said that 3500 would only piss off Iraqis but be unable to do anything. Thanks but no thanks. Obama hung his failure (and Hillary's) on the legal exception for the troops. He didn't even try to negoiate that. This is all Obama. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I will add you to the growing list of members who are stating you do not care if our military can be prosecuted in Iraq courts. That legal immunity means nothing to you. Thanks for dismissing our military.(REPEAT POINT) Originally Posted by i'va biggen
.(REPEAT POINT)Where, in any of the posts that I've made here, did I specifically state that we should be out there building every country for the sake of "nation building" itself?
herface is a Defense Department welfare queen. Nothing he nor Dick Cheney have said will ever change the fact that nation building if a long term losing proposition for the building country as a whole. Originally Posted by WTF
.(REPEAT POINT)if you were capable of understanding writing that even a fifth grader could understand, you would not have came to that conclusion. In fact, if you understood what you were reading, you would've understood that I was pointing out a threat that we were dealing with. You also would've understood that I was addressing the serious misconceptions that your side of the argument was, and still is, advancing on this thread.
It does redistribute wealth from many to a few. herface is part of that few wanting the charity and taxes of others to pay for people like you chickenshitness. Originally Posted by WTF
LexiLiar is pro military as long as the Commander in Chief and/or the military personnel share his Tea Party allegiance.LL is showing he has no comprehension of the Middle East geo politics and all the acumen of a Tea Bagger. Parroting their ignorant talking points. They were for the war before they were against it! He is the John Kerry in 2014
If they don't share his distorted political ideology, LLIdiot quickly becomes their biggest critics. Originally Posted by bigtex
Are you Dick Cheney's bastard child? Mortal Kombat my ass. If we invaded Mexico and tried to control their oil by installing a pro American government we would be in Mortal Kombat with Mexico. Why? Because Nation building is no longer possible what with social media and asymmetrical warfare. You can not win the hearts and minds of people unless their is a bigger threat they fear. Once that threat is dispersed they will turn on you....just as happened in Iraq. You are stuck in a 1950's mindset.
One of my arguments is that we are in a Mortal Kombat with an entity that wants to destroy our way of doing things. The current administration has failed to effectively carry out a policy to counter that. Don't mistake my pointing reality out as my arguing for a piece of the budget. Originally Posted by herfacechair