Waiting to be proven I am a dumbass, wakeup. Or is it you that has been divulged.

Hahahaha...YummyBinLaden...hah ahahahahahahahahahahaha!

And I've come to the conclusion that you are a narcissistic wack a do that can not handle the truth.

You counter the argument that you do not have a pimp with the public admittance that you basically do, as legally that is wtf a assistant can be charged with in the State of Texas....and I'm the crazy one! Originally Posted by WTF

Yeah, cause a pimp and a scheduler, that's basically the same.

And bitching about close relationships between hooktards, or hooktards and fucktards... well, I don't know that a forum designed to bring the two together is the place to make that complaint.

My assertion is that one needs to accept responsibility for their own actions and not try and blame any actions they may have done on others.

For example were you to be hanging around Osama bin Laden and you were targeted , it would not be because someone told the US government lies about you. It would be because of who you were hanging around. While extreme, it was the first example to come to mind. If that was not your question, sorry. Originally Posted by WTF

I said your post was unclear because you're mentioning two entirely different things, and so I'm seeking clarification.

You say that people should take responsibility for their own actions, then you turn around and say that any collateral damage against them is justified, solely based on who they hang around with, regardless of their actions.

Please clarify this seeming dichotomy...

Hahahaha...YummyBinLaden...hah ahahahahahahahahahahaha! Originally Posted by YummyMarie

YummyBeNuts

WTF, why would you attempt to justify a retard posting real world information under the guise of 'the friend of my enemy is my enemy'? Originally Posted by dearhunter

dh, what I am trying to do is not have CD blame others for her actions. I am not trying to justify others actions. I thought I made that clear with what I posted below.

We do not like each other and we've never met. Would I try and out you because I do not like you? No and I do not condone that type of behavior.

But that behavior does not give you the right to not take responsibility for your own behavior , which is trying to blame any collateral damage you may receive on others. Originally Posted by WTF

And I've come to the conclusion that you are a narcissistic wack a do that can not handle the truth.

You counter the argument that you do not have a pimp with the public admittance that you basically do, as legally that is wtf a assistant can be charged with in the State of Texas....and I'm the crazy one! Originally Posted by WTF

You're stupid... I can vouch for this girl and I don't know her. She is to me, one of the very few sane girls on here. Whoever you're hanging out with should have read the fine print in that contract. You're fucking with the wrong crowd, but to you he/she is a role model. Hahahah! CD, all you can do is ignore the ignorant. They will get a shark bite one of these days and then wonder where it came from. You're too good for this...

YummyDEESEnuts

dh, what I am trying to do is not have CD blame others for her actions. I am not trying to justify others actions. I thought I made that clear with what I posted below. Originally Posted by WTF

I see you writing that. But, it does not fit with your comment about association. You quoted a comment by CD "I just don't get it", and used that to justify the posting of her real world information. You either did it intentionally or you did it unintentionally, by taking the quote out of context to further your point........the context being that she did not get why LOTO would choose to go nuclear and post real world info about her.

There is no justification for outing real world information...........ever.

If one were to follow your logic to its natural conclusion, CD would be "justified" in dropping a real world bomb on you........ijs

I said your post was unclear because you're mentioning two entirely different things, and so I'm seeking clarification.

You say that people should take responsibility for their own actions, then you turn around and say that any collateral damage against them is justified, solely based on who they hang around with, regardless of their actions.

Please clarify this seeming dichotomy... Originally Posted by Wakeup

That is easy enough...

You say that people should take responsibility for their own actions, ... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Yes

then you turn around and say that any collateral damage against them is justified, solely based on who they hang around with, regardless of their actions.

... Originally Posted by Wakeup

That is not what I said.

For the second time, I do not condone outing.

We do not like each other and we've never met. Would I try and out you because I do not like you? No and I do not condone that type of behavior.

But that behavior does not give you the right to not take responsibility for your own behavior , which is trying to blame any collateral damage you may receive on others. Originally Posted by WTF

So no where have I tried to justify outing....be it collateral or direct. YM does not like this LOTO person. CD hangs with YM. CD is aware of the danger. For CD to try and blame anything that happens to her on others goes back to my first point. Which again does not justify outing.

So the collateral damage is not justified, but the person the collateral damage happens to is responsible for that damage...because of who they associate with? Is that your point?

I see you writing that. But, it does not fit with your comment about association. You quoted a comment by CD "I just don't get it", and used that to justify the posting of her real world information. You either did it intentionally or you did it unintentionally, by taking the quote out of context to further your point........the context being that she did not get why LOTO would choose to go nuclear and post real world info about her.

There is no justification for outing real world information...........ever. Originally Posted by dearhunter

WTF can justify anything he sets his mind to. Fortunately, no one has to agree with him. However, if they don't agree, they've made a menace of him for life.

Back on topic: LOTO...you have proven to be a dumbass to many. Regardless, I stand by my assessment that you are a weak-minded and terrible person.

It is "collateral damage" until it happens to you......then, not so much........ijs

WTF can justify anything he sets his mind to. Fortunately, no one has to agree with him. However, if they don't agree, they've made a menace of him for life.

Back on topic: LOTO...you have proven to be a dumbass to many. Regardless, I stand by my assessment that you are a weak-minded and terrible person. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Attempting to speak for me can be a dangerous thing.

You are incorrect.

I can have a reasoned conversation with WTF in this threAD without the slightest concern that he will be offended by it.

So the collateral damage is not justified, but the person the collateral damage happens to is responsible for that damage...because of who they associate with? Is that your point? Originally Posted by Wakeup

That is a whole bunch of assumptions. Each case is unique.

Let us stick to this one.

If CD knew the danger of hanging around YM who is pulling LOTO outing tail then CD is responsible for her part in the unjustified collateral damage that may happened to her.

Her trying to blame others for not liking her and implying they are responsible for telling LOTO to out her is LD's narcissistic wack-a-do kicking in again. .

Attempting to speak for me can be a dangerous thing.

You are incorrect.

I can have a reasoned conversation with WTF in this threAD without the slightest concern that he will be offended by it. Originally Posted by dearhunter

Correction...women who disagree with him are likely to create a menace of him for life.