Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

Maybe 1 out of 10 assup "jokes" are funny. Meanwhile, 100% of yours fall flat. Rey makes you a laughingstock and runs circles around your missing funnybone. You're so unfunny the only way you can even hope to keep up is to search the internet constantly for those lame "you're so gay..." jokes that aren't working for you.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

The fact you think rey is funny, says it all. He's as lame as they fucking get. And then there's you with your sewer rat business

Take a metamucil and shut the fuck up, you old geezer. Remember the good old days, you know, when your dick worked

You're so gay, you shit rainbow sherbet.

you just want lusty too stop by so you can C how sexy he/she look ... watch-out might give you a WET DREAM

The only way it could be better is if you included something about "snap back" sanctions. Originally Posted by gnadfly

I had a typo it's "Q" clearance. If you are into credentials like EX-CEO, these scientists who signed the letter certainly have them. "Q" clearance is a Military TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE. You didn't read the letter did you?

Also signing is Siegfried S. Hecker, a Stanford professor who, from 1986 to 1997, directed the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in New Mexico, the birthplace of the bomb. The facility produced designs for most of the arms now in the nation’s nuclear arsenal.
Other prominent signatories include Freeman Dyson of Princeton, Sidney Drell of Stanford and Rush D. Holt, a physicist and former member of Congress who now leads the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world’s largest general scientific society.
Most of the 29 who signed the letter are physicists, and many of them have held what the government calls Q clearances — granting access to a special category of secret information that bears on the design of nuclear arms and is considered equivalent to the military’s top secret security clearance.

I had a typo it's "Q" clearance. If you are into credentials like EX-CEO, these scientists who signed the letter certainly have them. "Q" clearance is a Military TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE. You didn't read the letter did you?

Also signing is Siegfried S. Hecker, a Stanford professor who, from 1986 to 1997, directed the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in New Mexico, the birthplace of the bomb. The facility produced designs for most of the arms now in the nation’s nuclear arsenal.
Other prominent signatories include Freeman Dyson of Princeton, Sidney Drell of Stanford and Rush D. Holt, a physicist and former member of Congress who now leads the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world’s largest general scientific society.
Most of the 29 who signed the letter are physicists, and many of them have held what the government calls Q clearances — granting access to a special category of secret information that bears on the design of nuclear arms and is considered equivalent to the military’s top secret security clearance. Originally Posted by flghtr65

He doesn't care about facts or circumstances. He has made up his mind that it's a bad deal because Obama is involved, nothing else needs to be said in his mind. He's a fucking mental midget. Don't waste your time.

A senate democrat predicts that there will be enough votes to block a veto override attempt by the republicans by the end of the week. So far, there are 31 democratic and independent senators who say they will vote for the deal. Only 34 votes are needed in the senate to block the veto override.

http://news.yahoo.com/key-democrat-u...154707975.html

A No vote will make ISIS very happy- as it stands right now Iran is the biggest deterrent to ISIS in the middle East.

A No vote will make ISIS very happy- as it stands right now Iran is the biggest deterrent to ISIS in the middle East. Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

And Iran doesn't have an AGENDA, now do they WE ? !

And Iran doesn't have an AGENDA, now do they WE ? ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Both Iran and the USA have the same agenda against ISIS, ISIL

I had a typo it's "Q" clearance. If you are into credentials like EX-CEO, these scientists who signed the letter certainly have them. "Q" clearance is a Military TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE. You didn't read the letter did you?

Also signing is Siegfried S. Hecker, a Stanford professor who... Originally Posted by flghtr65

Meaningless. I read all three letters days ago. I knew they all weren't nuke scis. Again, the issue isn't IF they cheat or IF they'll be found out, it's what are the consequences? There are none. There are no "snap back options." They can happily go on making the bomb. What does the first General/Admirals letter say if the Iranians cheat other than all options are on the table? All bark, no bite.

A senate democrat predicts that there will be enough votes to block a veto override attempt by the republicans by the end of the week. So far, there are 31 democratic and independent senators who say they will vote for the deal. Only 34 votes are needed in the senate to block the veto override. Originally Posted by flghtr65

And I agree whether the "treaty" doesn't pass the legislature is meaningless, the "gimmees" to Iran have already left the barn thanks to Obama obtaining a UN agreement. The only hope was to renegotiate the deal and that's not going to happen with this administration.

The main point is that if Israel attacks Iran's nuke sites, they are on their own. Again, when Obama's term is over Iran will not have substantially fulfilled any major obligation.

Both Iran and Obama have the same agenda against the USA Originally Posted by WTF

FTFY

And Iran doesn't have an AGENDA, now do they WE ? ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Both Iran and the USA have the same agenda against ISIS, ISIL Originally Posted by WTF

You think this mouthbreather is able to make that distinction?

He doesn't understand how Iran could hate ISIS just as much as we do. Hell, they're closer to Iran than they are to us, he should at least get that part.

Do any of you have real Intel before you start talking about this shit?

And Iran doesn't have an AGENDA, now do they WE ? ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

No they don't sir except defending their land- they are surronded by hostile enemies. Shouldn't the number one job of any country be to protect its citizens ? Israel never signed the nuclear proliferation act but it's widely known that since the 80's - Israel has nukes- even if they announced today that they were building a nuke - all the republicans would be elated and probably would pressure Obama to give Israel everything they need to build a nuke.
Most of you republicans choose to erase or distort history - it was the United States who supported a brutal dictator by the name of Shah Reza Palavi. Even when the Shah's regime were violating various human rights law and jailed or killed anyone who spoke a word against the regime - the U.S turned a blind eye- you know why ? Because we were more concerned in using Iran as a spy station on the soviets. So don't none of you feed me this feel good story of how we care about human lives because we don't - we only care about what's best in our interest.
Also keep in my the Taliban were in power 5 years before we invaded Afghanistan and in those 5 years they were still as brutal as ever and one of the first words out of George W Bush's mouth were the Taliban has one of the most brutal regimes ever we need to liberate the people of Afghanistan. A total lie and bullshit - where was the U.S the previous 5 years?

You think this mouthbreather is able to make that distinction?

He doesn't understand how Iran could hate ISIS just as much as we do. Hell, they're closer to Iran than they are to us, he should at least get that part. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Maybe if you can convince WE that they have an agenda, he'll sic his attorney on them !

No they don't sir except defending their land- they are surronded by hostile enemies. Shouldn't the number one job of any country be to protect its citizens ? Israel never signed the nuclear proliferation act but it's widely known that since the 80's - Israel has nukes- even if they announced today that they were building a nuke - all the republicans would be elated and probably would pressure Obama to give Israel everything they need to build a nuke.
Most of you republicans choose to erase or distort history - it was the United States who supported a brutal dictator by the name of Shah Reza Palavi. Even when the Shah's regime were violating various human rights law and jailed or killed anyone who spoke a word against the regime - the U.S turned a blind eye- you know why ? Because we were more concerned in using Iran as a spy station on the soviets. So don't none of you feed me this feel good story of how we care about human lives because we don't - we only care about what's best in our interest.
Also keep in my the Taliban were in power 5 years before we invaded Afghanistan and in those 5 years they were still as brutal as ever and one of the first words out of George W Bush's mouth were the Taliban has one of the most brutal regimes ever we need to liberate the people of Afghanistan. A total lie and bullshit - where was the U.S the previous 5 years? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Who had the White House for those 5 years BEFORE Bush took office ? Oh ! That's right ! Slick Willy the sexual predator ! The same one that rewrote HIS history after leaving office by saying that HE could have taken out Bin Laden ! But HE didn't do SHIT about EITHER ONE, now did he, Mr. Friggen AGENDA. You are entitled to your own fucked up OPINION , by not your own FACTS, doofus !

No they don't sir except defending their land- they are surronded by hostile enemies. Shouldn't the number one job of any country be to protect its citizens ? Israel never signed the nuclear proliferation act but it's widely known that since the 80's - Israel has nukes- even if they announced today that they were building a nuke - all the republicans would be elated and probably would pressure Obama to give Israel everything they need to build a nuke.
Most of you republicans choose to erase or distort history - it was the United States who supported a brutal dictator by the name of Shah Reza Palavi. Even when the Shah's regime were violating various human rights law and jailed or killed anyone who spoke a word against the regime - the U.S turned a blind eye- you know why ? Because we were more concerned in using Iran as a spy station on the soviets. So don't none of you feed me this feel good story of how we care about human lives because we don't - we only care about what's best in our interest.
Also keep in my the Taliban were in power 5 years before we invaded Afghanistan and in those 5 years they were still as brutal as ever and one of the first words out of George W Bush's mouth were the Taliban has one of the most brutal regimes ever we need to liberate the people of Afghanistan. A total lie and bullshit - where was the U.S the previous 5 years? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

This, I hate to admit it, is true. We have meddled in Iran for decades, going WAY back. Go read up on it. And it's all come back to bite us in the end as Russia and Iran are now friendlier than ever. Who facilitated that friendship?