... You must mean the fact that I mentioned that Fani and "boy-toy"
Nathan Wade would be in trouble and removed from the case??
... See? ... Salty KNOWS! ...

#### Salty
.
Blimey! ... Fani Willis and her office hit with a $54,000 fine
for violating the GA Open Records Law... She won't turn over
what the defendants' barristers are asking-for.
So, this fine is just for the violation - Fani STILL has to comply
with the Law and hand over the records.
... Will JAIL be next IF she doesn't comply?? ......
Crikey! ... Irony all-about here ... She was gonna put Trump in jail -
and look where we are......
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Merchant said she requested about a dozen sets of records from the DA’s office, including non-disclosure agreements employees are required to sign, a list of attorneys hired by Willis since taking office and receipts for the DA’s contract with a New York-based “media monitoring service.”
The ruling, issued Friday by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause, marks a rare win for those seeking access to public records held by government agencies.
Krause determined the DA’s office failed to comply with Georgia’s Open Records Act by withholding public documents and said those failures “were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious.”
Because the DA’s office lacked justification for denying the records, Willis’ office must pay attorney fees and litigation expenses to Merchant, her husband, John, and the attorney couple’s paralegal, all of whom worked to get the records, the judge ruled.
The court order noted that Dexter Bond, the Open Records Custodian, was “openly hostile to counsel for Plaintiff, Ms. Merchant, and testified that Ms. Merchant’s requests were handled differently than other requests,” according to Fox News.Bond, who testified that his usual practice was to call a requestor to receive additional information to fulfill requests, indicated that he refused to communicate with Merchant by telephone, the court order stated.This entire case was a mess. You would think that if you were a prosecutor trying to prosecute a presidential candidate to influence the outcome of an election, you would have your you-know-what together.
"While there is no requirement under the ORA for Mr. Bond to call any requestor about a particular request, Mr. Bond's handling of Ms. Merchant's requests in this manner indicates a lack of good faith," the order said. "Defendants’ failures were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious."
Yet, Willis’ team completely botched this case. The notion that they tried to conceal Willis’ affair with another prosecutor goes to show just how corrupt this office is. It’s good that the judge ruled in Merchant’s favor, but perhaps it is time to start discussing whether Willis should keep her job.
Salty told ya!
#### TWK
BAHHAHAAAAAA