Trump's red line

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 08-15-2017, 01:25 PM
Really? When was the last time our country's presidential inauguration had a riot going on in the background to the sound of the band, while windows were being smashed and cars set on fire? Originally Posted by goodolboy
Probably during Vietnam.

Do you understand wtf a peaceful transfer of power is?

We had it after this election just like we have jad after every election.

Demonstrators does not mean there was not a peaceful transfer of power.

Quit being an idiot on this point.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 08-15-2017, 01:29 PM
Provide evidence that the Russians were tampering with ballots you shithead. Or any evidence that Trump colluded with Putin you moron. Originally Posted by bambino
There is evidence they tried to hack into voting machines.

Trump was the one crying about a rigged election before he won....he knew the Russians tried to hack it. It just blew up in his face now that he won.
LexusLover's Avatar
Add to that, according to Fox, a recent report shows OBAMA KNEW the russians were going to try and meddle in our election for 3 YEARS. And did nothing to stop it.
Originally Posted by garhkal
As the timeline is moved back in time more and more "pundit-mind readers" will start claiming that Trump knew all along .... but the point of his remarks during the campaign were directly at what WAS HAPPENING within the Democratic Party "dirty tricks" orchestrated by the HillariousNoMore rat nest. Trump never made any references to foreign intervention ... the "interference" was within the DNC ... as it became apparent by the time of their convention.

After he laid out the speculation, as is usually the case in life, the GUILTY DOG (HillariousNoMore) WAS THE FIRST TO BARK!

It's remarkable how ignorant loudmouths blame Trump for everything under the Sun ... but belittle him and his abilities at the same time. It reminds me of the same group blaming Bush for "tricking" Congress into voting for the Iraq invasion while at the same time calling him a dumbass!

Is it possible that Trump OUT SMARTED the Liberals in 2016?

And therefore is it POSSIBLE that all the ignorant, uneducated, worthless, pieces of conservative shit OUT SMARTED all the "MORE EDUCATED AND SOPHISTICATE INTELLECTUALS" in the country by quietly and secretly in defiance of the polls and pundits supporting and voting for the guy who would OUT SMART the LIBERALS IN 2016 by assuring that SUFFICIENT ELECTORAL VOTES would be won by THEIR much SMARTER AND CRAFTY CANDIDATE who was able to defeat the best the Republican Party could produce and then beat the best the DNC could send out to stroll into the White House?

You LIBERALS keep proving what a bunch of ill-advised dumbasses you are every time you open your mouth to blame Trump for all the shit you guys stir up!
MT Pockets's Avatar
you disappeared yesterday. Did you get 20 in? Or did you fall short? Originally Posted by bambino
Some of us have to work. we can not all be freeloaders like you. And no I did not get 20 in. I looked and all the guys said you had just finished servicing them and they felt so bad about face fucking a dried up old man that they were gonna go hang out with Mike Pence.
LexusLover's Avatar
Some of us have to work..... Originally Posted by MT Pockets
Too bad you didn't work hard enough and smart enough this time last year to get your candidate elected so you wouldn't have to work so hard this year! (Or would you have to work harder?)

Wait! Is that what happened?

All the LIBERALS were too fucking busy WORKING LAST YEAR and didn't turn out to vote for HillariousNoMore, because they couldn't take off work long enough to vote!

And all those ignorant, uneducated, unemployed, welfare recipients had all the time in the world on their hands so they were able to turn out the vote FOR THE SMARTER CANDIDATE? How diabolical of those DEPLORABLES!!!!
lustylad's Avatar
There is evidence they tried to hack into voting machines. Originally Posted by WTF
Ok, let's get technical. If someone tries to hack into a server, you can usually tell upon forensic examination if 1) they made an attempt, and 2) the attempt was successful or not.

Here is what I am getting at... the FBI let hildebeest off the hook partly by claiming they found no forensic proof that the illegal private server she set up and used as SOS had been hacked by foreign agents.

A few months after hildebeest was exonerated, the NYT ran a story claiming that the Russians had attempted to hack into the RNC (Republican) server but they were unsuccessful.

How could the FBI detect attempted hacks of the RNC server but couldn't tell us whether there were any attempted hacks of hildebeest's server?

People like Michael Hayden (Pittsburgh native) who worked many years in intelligence say it was a virtual certainty that foreign governments at least TRIED to hack into hildebeest's server while she was SOS. Why couldn't the FBI/Jim Comey confirm this?
LexusLover's Avatar
I jumped off the roof of my house and "tried to fly"!

Is there some news here? If a voting machine is not "on line" how the hell does one "hack into the voting machine"!

That's not the dumbest thing that WTF has ever predicted, the dumbest thing was that Zimmerman would be convicted of "something" as a result of the trial in the killing of Martin!

But what can one expect from the SMARTEST LIBERAL IN TEXAS who builds houses and can't get his candidate enough votes to win the election? So he spends the next eight years whining and whimpering about the winner!
goodolboy's Avatar

Do you understand wtf a peaceful transfer of power is? Originally Posted by WTF
One where there are not riots, looting and burning cars down at the new presidents inauguration?
I also don't recall attempts to thwart the will of the voters before by trying to find a loophole to get the electoral college to vote against the election results and change the outcome of the election.This was then followed by claims that the Russians hacked the voting machines, which was followed days later with calls of impeachment of the new president.

"The push to deny Trump the requisite 270 electors and send the election to the House of Representatives seemingly was doomed from the start, though it received significant media attention. In the end, only two Republican electors broke ranks – more defected on the Democratic side from Hillary Clinton. What comes next for anti-Trumpers isn't entirely clear." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...new-cause.html



Yssup Rider's Avatar
You're such a goodolsnowflake!

waaahhhh. Waaaahhhh. Waaaaahhh.
goodolboy's Avatar
You're such a goodolsnowflake!

waaahhhh. Waaaahhhh. Waaaaahhh. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

LOL, says the man still crying over losing the election nine months ago.
It's remarkable how ignorant loudmouths blame Trump for everything under the Sun ... but belittle him and his abilities at the same time. It reminds me of the same group blaming Bush for "tricking" Congress into voting for the Iraq invasion while at the same time calling him a dumbass! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Its not remarkable. IMO its ALL the lame stream media is about. BLAMING everything on Trump, just like they did bush.
LexusLover's Avatar
Its not remarkable. IMO its ALL the lame stream media is about. BLAMING everything on Trump, just like they did bush. Originally Posted by garhkal
So the media is acknowledging Trump is a smarter candidate and an even smarter President. And all the Little Whiners whose candidate was thrashed by the smarter candidate are also agreeing.

By all the anger, violence, crying, blubbering, and impeachment talk they are acknowledging he's too smart to beat in 2020 so they have to try to "overthrow" him and forcefully drive him from office!
bamscram's Avatar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc



Wonder where they got the idea?
So the media is acknowledging Trump is a smarter candidate and an even smarter President. And all the Little Whiners whose candidate was thrashed by the smarter candidate are also agreeing.

By all the anger, violence, crying, blubbering, and impeachment talk they are acknowledging he's too smart to beat in 2020 so they have to try to "overthrow" him and forcefully drive him from office! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Exactly. IMO they are trying to in essence, stage a coup, just without military involvement.
bambino's Avatar
There is evidence they tried to hack into voting machines.

Trump was the one crying about a rigged election before he won....he knew the Russians tried to hack it. It just blew up in his face now that he won. Originally Posted by WTF
Voting machines are not connected to the internet you fucking idiot. They would have to be tampered with on site. Show us the proof shithead. Who's the conspiracy theorist? Dumbass.