SURPRISE! Former Aide to AOC Now Running the Communist Party of New YorkThese are Commies and they are trying to crater the whole system. They do not love America and should not be allowed in America. They are the Demonic lackies for The Powers That Be, aka The Elite, that want to make massive amounts of $$ off of our demise.
by Mike LaChance May. 13, 2023 10:00 pm
A former aide to far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now the boss of the New York Communist party.
Doesn’t this confirm pretty much everything that AOC’s critics have claimed since she first appeared on the national stage?
AOC and the people associated with her do not want to have a debate about policy. They want to destroy our capitalist system and the free market.
The New York Post reports:Former AOC aide Justine Medina now working as New York Communist Party bossThe report goes on to note that Medina is a child of wealthy parents, and that her own father escaped communism in Cuba by coming to the United States.
A ex-aide to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now working as a senior official in the New York State Communist Party.
Justine Medina, 33, spent a year employed by “The Squad” leader as a political organizer in 2020 and was paid more than $35,000 between February and November of that year, Federal Election Commission records show.
Almost immediately after the election, Medina began working as a full-blown Marxist. In July 2021, she was identified as “co-chair of the New York Young Communist League” by the Communist Party newspaper People’s World. The same publication today identifies her as a member of the “Executive Committee of the New York State Communist Party.”
Social media records show Medina’s Marxist proclivities were in full bloom before and during her employment with Rep. Ocasio-Cortez.
“Well, I am a Communist, but work for AOC,” she said proudly in a tweet from October 2020. “Communism is about equality, democracy, peace, the advancement of workers, the oppressed, and humanity in general,” she added a month later.
“It is true the path there will be unkind to those who block progress, but Communism is good and should not scare you,” she noted darkly in the same posting...
Not a single element of this story is surprising.
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-14-2023, 07:18 AM
...she sure gots a purdy mouth, albeit with a bit of a tooth-scrape danger...
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-14-2023, 09:05 AM
Still cannot confirm this guy isn't Tiny as I'm not sure I would recognize him without his mask, goggles and hazmat suit - but I know she is definitely his type.
- Redhot1960
- 05-14-2023, 11:37 AM
Still cannot confirm this guy isn't Tiny as I'm not sure I would recognize him without his mask, goggles and hazmat suit - but I know she is definitely his type.I saw "Ass On Carpet" (AOC), just yesterday. I typed in UNI-PARTY and this is what came up.
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Bitch needs some IVERMECTIN
- Tiny
- 05-14-2023, 12:21 PM
Still cannot confirm this guy isn't Tiny as I'm not sure I would recognize him without his mask, goggles and hazmat suit - but I know she is definitely his type.You’re a man of the world WYID. You know that crazy women are better in bed. And AOC’s as crazy as they come.
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
And no, that bozo’s not me. “Negging” can be an effective pickup technique, but in general calling a woman a baby killer is not a good way to get her into the sack.
- Salty Again
- 05-14-2023, 12:58 PM
... Too right there, Tiny.
Sometimes we gotta give our mates the "schoolhouse lessons"...
AOC is surely going places... If her political career collapses
she'd surely be apples in another career --- doing Porn.
### Salty
Sometimes we gotta give our mates the "schoolhouse lessons"...
AOC is surely going places... If her political career collapses
she'd surely be apples in another career --- doing Porn.
### Salty
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-14-2023, 06:25 PM
Believe it or not, I have a motive beyond the simple sexual side for mentioning AOC. You do believe that right?!? But not today. Seems I'm supposed to be somewhere doing something in honor of someone.
Make no mistake, AOC and ilk are the Demonic minions of the clear and present danger involving the CO2 scam/tyranny that we will need to eradicate before it eradicates our way of life. We are getting scammed by hypocrites on this Saul Alynski scam. I'll be back...
Call me a Negative Nike:
Never stick your d*ck in crazy... Even if it looks soft and juicy. Just Don't Do It!
Make no mistake, AOC and ilk are the Demonic minions of the clear and present danger involving the CO2 scam/tyranny that we will need to eradicate before it eradicates our way of life. We are getting scammed by hypocrites on this Saul Alynski scam. I'll be back...
Call me a Negative Nike:
Never stick your d*ck in crazy... Even if it looks soft and juicy. Just Don't Do It!
- Tiny
- 05-14-2023, 11:41 PM
I saw "Ass On Carpet" (AOC), just yesterday. I typed in UNI-PARTY and this is what came up.Ivermectin? Normally I'd shout out a big "Hell Yeah" to killing off the parasites in Washington D.C. But not my AOC. She's going to be my baby momma. You don't have to worry about her. I'm going to keep her barefoot and pregnant, so she won't be sucking off the government tit and creating chaos anymore.
Bitch needs some IVERMECTIN
Originally Posted by Redhot1960
- dilbert firestorm
- 05-15-2023, 04:24 AM
I wasted 2 minutes of my life reading that article, plus an additional minute looking for the AOC titties flash. I can forgo the failed tattas bit, but I want those other 2 minutes back regardless.heres your answer. its all about geology of the area. the land in southeast is mostly mud.
How is it some people can't even ask the obvious question:
How in heck does the sea level rise in only the Southeast and not everywhere else?!?
Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
the land is sinking which gives an appearance that sea level is rising execpt that it isn't.
some of the soil subsidence is from oil and gas drilling. others are a result of policies that limit flooding which produces much needed soil to build up land in areas that need it away from cities.
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-15-2023, 06:43 AM
heres your answer. its all about geology of the area. the land in southeast is mostly mud.Pretty astute, but missing the wind a little - me thinks. Recall that shorelines are typically made of sand. It comes and it goes over time. Here's a fun fact: 100% of hurricanes occur along the coast lines. Also, they occur so often that they have a naming system for them. Kinda like numbers on sports uniforms. Some hurricanes are so memorable that they "retire" the name/number.
the land is sinking which gives an appearance that sea level is rising execpt that it isn't.
some of the soil subsidence is from oil and gas drilling. others are a result of policies that limit flooding which produces much needed soil to build up land in areas that need it away from cities. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
But you have a great point about the shifting of mass from the North, i.e. flood control. Kind of reminds me of the wild fires in California mountains. You may recall the policy was to let them burn out naturally, like it does in the wild. But that didn't play well as people were dying. In short, they did not compensate for people living in the woods. Instead they tried to save a few bucks by just letting them burn.
- Texas Contrarian
- 05-15-2023, 09:34 AM
Now the Texas Contrarian hands the microphone to the Manhattan Contrarian (Francis Menton) who understands the climate cult issue better than he does, and I suspect just about as well as anyone.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/...gainst-america
Biden Federal Government Goes Full Suicide Bomber Against America
May 14, 2023/ Francis Menton
From his first days in office, President Biden has promised — threatened — to activate the administrative state at every level to address and solve the “climate crisis.” In the orthodoxy of the Biden/Democrat climate cult, this is to be accomplished by reducing U.S. carbon emissions into the atmosphere.
Now, even if you believe that a little more CO2 in the atmosphere is some kind of a problem (it isn’t), there is nothing that the United States can do to have any meaningful impact on that situation, given that countries with populations a large multiple of ours (China, India, Africa) are building coal-fired power plants as fast as they can. Even if we closed our economy entirely and reduced ourselves to eating grass and bugs, the effect on the climate would be zilch.
Meanwhile we have waited through the first two plus years of Bidenism to find out exactly what punishments the administrative state has in mind for us for our sins of prosperity and enjoyment of life. In the last few weeks, we have learned at least part of the answer, in the form of a series of gigantic new regulatory proposals emanating from EPA and other agencies. The answer is, the federal government will become a suicide bomber seeking to blow up and destroy the American economy and the well-being of the American people.
Here are three major regulatory initiatives from the past few weeks, each one supposedly somehow addressing this “climate crisis” thing:
On April 12, EPA released its proposed rule titled “Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light- Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles.” This rule essentially makes it impossible for automobile manufacturers to produce anything but fully-electric vehicles within a few years.
On May 5, the Department of Energy released proposed new “efficiency” standards for dishwashers.
And then on May 8, EPA released the mother of all regulations, with the endless title “New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.” This is the long-awaited regulation that seeks a complete transformation of the electricity-generation sector of the economy, toward something that has never been demonstrated to work and whose cost is without doubt a large multiple of the system we now have.
I previously covered the new vehicle rule, really an EV mandate, in this post on May 5. True to form of regulators who treat their subjects with contempt, the rule never explicitly states that the cars we now use are henceforth to be banned. Rather, it is some 262 pages of impenetrable text, which has buried somewhere deep inside a formula (82 g/mile CO2 emissions) that only an industry professional would know effectively bans internal combustion vehicles. All manufacturers are to be forced to comply, irrespective of whether they can do so profitably.
What is the probability that the new EV mandate will put all large U.S. and European automakers out of business in favor of Chinese competitors who have an advantage in the EV segment? The regulators neither know nor care. From Engineering & Technology, May 9:
According to insurers Allianz Trade, China’s decision to invest heavily in EV production over the last 15 years has made it the global leader in this sector. . . . Chinese brands have seen their global market shares climb from less than 40 per cent in 2020 to close to 50 per cent in 2022. This is heavily bolstered by an 80 per cent market share in their densely-populated home country.
In the world of dishwashers, we already have dishwashers that don’t work very well. The reason is regulator-imposed restrictions on use of energy and water. Today, due to these restriction, dishwashers run for more than two hours, and still don’t get the dishes very clean unless you pre-wash them by hand. Well, with the new Energy Department rule, it’s about to get a lot worse. From the WSJ, May 12:
The proposal requires manufacturers to slash water use by a third, limiting machines to 3.2 gallons per cycle, down from the current federal limit of five gallons. New appliances must simultaneously cut estimated annual energy usage by nearly 30%.
And then there is the new power plant rule. This one is 682 pages. Again, it never explicitly says that fossil fuel power plants are banned; it’s just that the emissions standards that they set cannot be met by any fossil fuel plant. The WSJ on May 11 calls the rule a “death sentence” for fossil fuel power plants.
Supposedly the fossil fuel plants can continue to operate if they adopt some means to capture the carbon emissions from their exhaust. I have previously described this idea of carbon capture as a “war against the second law of thermodynamics.” Trying to capture CO2 from power plant emissions requires energy, and the higher the percentage of the emissions you want to capture, the more energy it takes. If you insist on capturing all of the emissions and somehow storing them permanently, it’s going to take more energy than the power plant produces. There has been endless talk about carbon capture for more than a decade, and there is almost nothing in the way of functional carbon capture systems, because as they capture enough carbon to be meaningful, their cost soars out of control.
Will there be any functional replacement for the fossil fuel plants by the time they are forced out of business? This rule doesn’t trouble itself with such matters. That’s for the low status people to figure out. Over here at EPA, we are much too important for that. Our job is to save the planet.
So the regulatory onslaught continues. We are told to expect yet more such regulations, notably in the area of home appliances, in the near future.
Put it all together, and the term “war against the economy” no longer does justice to what is going on. This is a full-blown attack by suicide bombers. They are so crazed with the righteousness of their cause that they couldn’t care less about the destruction and devastation they might cause to the innocent people around them, let alone even about their own death. Who ever thought our federal government would get into such a role?
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/...gainst-america
Biden Federal Government Goes Full Suicide Bomber Against America
May 14, 2023/ Francis Menton
From his first days in office, President Biden has promised — threatened — to activate the administrative state at every level to address and solve the “climate crisis.” In the orthodoxy of the Biden/Democrat climate cult, this is to be accomplished by reducing U.S. carbon emissions into the atmosphere.
Now, even if you believe that a little more CO2 in the atmosphere is some kind of a problem (it isn’t), there is nothing that the United States can do to have any meaningful impact on that situation, given that countries with populations a large multiple of ours (China, India, Africa) are building coal-fired power plants as fast as they can. Even if we closed our economy entirely and reduced ourselves to eating grass and bugs, the effect on the climate would be zilch.
Meanwhile we have waited through the first two plus years of Bidenism to find out exactly what punishments the administrative state has in mind for us for our sins of prosperity and enjoyment of life. In the last few weeks, we have learned at least part of the answer, in the form of a series of gigantic new regulatory proposals emanating from EPA and other agencies. The answer is, the federal government will become a suicide bomber seeking to blow up and destroy the American economy and the well-being of the American people.
Here are three major regulatory initiatives from the past few weeks, each one supposedly somehow addressing this “climate crisis” thing:
On April 12, EPA released its proposed rule titled “Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light- Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles.” This rule essentially makes it impossible for automobile manufacturers to produce anything but fully-electric vehicles within a few years.
On May 5, the Department of Energy released proposed new “efficiency” standards for dishwashers.
And then on May 8, EPA released the mother of all regulations, with the endless title “New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule.” This is the long-awaited regulation that seeks a complete transformation of the electricity-generation sector of the economy, toward something that has never been demonstrated to work and whose cost is without doubt a large multiple of the system we now have.
I previously covered the new vehicle rule, really an EV mandate, in this post on May 5. True to form of regulators who treat their subjects with contempt, the rule never explicitly states that the cars we now use are henceforth to be banned. Rather, it is some 262 pages of impenetrable text, which has buried somewhere deep inside a formula (82 g/mile CO2 emissions) that only an industry professional would know effectively bans internal combustion vehicles. All manufacturers are to be forced to comply, irrespective of whether they can do so profitably.
What is the probability that the new EV mandate will put all large U.S. and European automakers out of business in favor of Chinese competitors who have an advantage in the EV segment? The regulators neither know nor care. From Engineering & Technology, May 9:
According to insurers Allianz Trade, China’s decision to invest heavily in EV production over the last 15 years has made it the global leader in this sector. . . . Chinese brands have seen their global market shares climb from less than 40 per cent in 2020 to close to 50 per cent in 2022. This is heavily bolstered by an 80 per cent market share in their densely-populated home country.
In the world of dishwashers, we already have dishwashers that don’t work very well. The reason is regulator-imposed restrictions on use of energy and water. Today, due to these restriction, dishwashers run for more than two hours, and still don’t get the dishes very clean unless you pre-wash them by hand. Well, with the new Energy Department rule, it’s about to get a lot worse. From the WSJ, May 12:
The proposal requires manufacturers to slash water use by a third, limiting machines to 3.2 gallons per cycle, down from the current federal limit of five gallons. New appliances must simultaneously cut estimated annual energy usage by nearly 30%.
And then there is the new power plant rule. This one is 682 pages. Again, it never explicitly says that fossil fuel power plants are banned; it’s just that the emissions standards that they set cannot be met by any fossil fuel plant. The WSJ on May 11 calls the rule a “death sentence” for fossil fuel power plants.
Supposedly the fossil fuel plants can continue to operate if they adopt some means to capture the carbon emissions from their exhaust. I have previously described this idea of carbon capture as a “war against the second law of thermodynamics.” Trying to capture CO2 from power plant emissions requires energy, and the higher the percentage of the emissions you want to capture, the more energy it takes. If you insist on capturing all of the emissions and somehow storing them permanently, it’s going to take more energy than the power plant produces. There has been endless talk about carbon capture for more than a decade, and there is almost nothing in the way of functional carbon capture systems, because as they capture enough carbon to be meaningful, their cost soars out of control.
Will there be any functional replacement for the fossil fuel plants by the time they are forced out of business? This rule doesn’t trouble itself with such matters. That’s for the low status people to figure out. Over here at EPA, we are much too important for that. Our job is to save the planet.
So the regulatory onslaught continues. We are told to expect yet more such regulations, notably in the area of home appliances, in the near future.
Put it all together, and the term “war against the economy” no longer does justice to what is going on. This is a full-blown attack by suicide bombers. They are so crazed with the righteousness of their cause that they couldn’t care less about the destruction and devastation they might cause to the innocent people around them, let alone even about their own death. Who ever thought our federal government would get into such a role?
- Salty Again
- 05-15-2023, 09:49 AM
... GREAT article there, TC... Thanks for posting it.
#### Salty
#### Salty
- Redhot1960
- 05-15-2023, 11:55 AM
click the youtube icon on the video for link and comments
May 8, 2023
Dr Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace, shares how he came to join the fledgling group that founded Greenpeace, the bold endeavours and significant victories obtained by the young organisation during its early years, and the details behind his decision to walk away from the organisation after 15 years of devoted involvement. Moore's comprehensive understanding of the Earth's geologic time scale and contextualisation of climate change, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and extreme weather events, among others, is solid and fascinating. A true environmentalist, Moore is a rare example of someone who placed his principles above all else.
May 8, 2023
Dr Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace, shares how he came to join the fledgling group that founded Greenpeace, the bold endeavours and significant victories obtained by the young organisation during its early years, and the details behind his decision to walk away from the organisation after 15 years of devoted involvement. Moore's comprehensive understanding of the Earth's geologic time scale and contextualisation of climate change, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and extreme weather events, among others, is solid and fascinating. A true environmentalist, Moore is a rare example of someone who placed his principles above all else.
- dilbert firestorm
- 05-16-2023, 02:15 AM
the environmentalist have sued by way of lawfare against energy companies in federal court. their strategy didn't really work. they lost every case in federal court. they're now doing it in state courts. its a mixed bag there.
one question... why isn't anyone filing suit against people engaged in this type of climate change scam and science data fraud.
one question... why isn't anyone filing suit against people engaged in this type of climate change scam and science data fraud.
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-16-2023, 05:43 AM
Sure would be a shame if a nasty, man made, bug-a-boo, that mainly targeted OLD people, happened along which allowed some people to shutdown the entire economy for a couple years. I mean, given that our current incarnation of the FBI and LambSCREAM media are entirely corrupt and would collude to no end to end the booming Trump economy of 2019.
Jack Crowe July 12, 2019Trust me: Thinking really isn't all that hard if you ignore the chattering monkeys.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted recently that the true motivation behind introducing the Green New Deal is to overhaul the “entire economy.”
Chakrabarti said that addressing climate change was not Ocasio-Cortez’s top priority in proposing the Green New Deal during a meeting with Washington governor Jay Inslee.
“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti said to Inslee’s climate director, Sam Ricketts, according to a Washington Post reporter who attended the meeting for a profile published Wednesday.
“Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” he added...
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-16-2023, 05:49 AM
People actually fell for this ridiculous BS?!?! What's next? Integrity in the FBI?!?
Faggit about it!!!
Faggit about it!!!