Hired Guns or mere coincidence?

I can't imagine paying a provider for a session for the sole purpose of writing a NO review. These so-called "hired guns" should rethink their business model. Originally Posted by Netx9

Perhaps they were compensated/reimbursed... could be an allowable business expense........... Payment can come in many forms It's a shame so many of these ladies are afraid to speak yup. They receive messages that if they say anything or refute anything that they will be out-ed or destroyed,,,,,

Let me ask a Next9 type question that no one else seems to in these cases.....

Did either of the guys contact the provider with their concerns before posting the negative review?

I've heard a story vastly different then the reviews portrayed, Perhaps you should ask some questions since you seem to care a bit about the ladies...... or is it just one that you champion?

Perhaps they were compensated/reimbursed... could be an allowable business expense........... Payment can come in many forms It's a shame so many of these ladies are afraid to speak yup. They receive messages that if they say anything or refute anything that they will be out-ed or destroyed,,,,,

Let me ask a Next9 type question that no one else seems to in these cases.....

Did either of the guys contact the provider with their concerns before posting the negative review?

I've heard a story vastly different then the reviews portrayed, Perhaps you should ask some questions since you seem to care a bit about the ladies...... or is it just one that you champion? Originally Posted by Whispers

Now how would I know that? For that matter, how would anyone else reading this? How about pointing out the reviews in question or asking the posters of those reviews. I'm just commenting on the only thing comment-able without specifics - whether your premise that there is such a conspiracy possible that would include 2 (TWO) guys paying for a session for the sole purpose of NO reviews. I know people do crazy things in this hobby, but that stretches quite a bit.

As for "stories" you've "heard", do you expect someone seeking your assistance would say "Yup, I sucked, review is right". Belies the whole premise of this thread.

He said/she said happens all the time - is it possible they are legit experiences and the provider(s) in question are involving you to obfuscate for them instead of posting their side in a coed post? Of course, it also sounds like they may have access to ROS and or other PRIVATE comments - but that's to be expected, I guess.

I've heard a story vastly different then the reviews portrayed, Perhaps you should ask some questions since you seem to care a bit about the ladies...... or is it just one that you champion? Originally Posted by Whispers

Only fools believe all of what they hear. You're the master at twisting truth, you should know - you remind me of Bill Clinton!

He said/she said happens all the time - is it possible they are legit experiences and the provider(s) in question are involving you to obfuscate for them instead of posting their side in a coed post?

Nope... The provider reviewed never contacted me until after this thread was up.... It was questioned by a couple of other ladies...

Of course, it also sounds like they may have access to ROS and or other PRIVATE comments - but that's to be expected, I guess. Originally Posted by Netx9

I wouldn't know that for sure or I would report it.... Ladies that asked knew both ladies and heard some of the trash talking I guess.

In light of other issues it was suggested I read those reviews and I was asked for my opinion. I felt it was worth mention on the board in a forum and did hence this thread.

I wouldn't know that for sure or I would report it.... Ladies that asked knew both ladies and heard some of the trash talking I guess.

In light of other issues it was suggested I read those reviews and I was asked for my opinion. I felt it was worth mention on the board in a forum and did hence this thread. Originally Posted by Whispers

I wasn't going to say anything, but know I feel it's necessary.

If you were asked for your opinion, how does that qualify as a public view on a review only viewable by premium members? IJS..

Here's a thought! Keep your opinions to yourself! No one gives a rats ass what you think pal.

I wasn't going to say anything, but know I feel it's necessary.

If you were asked for your opinion, how does that qualify as a public view on a review only viewable by premium members? IJS..

Here's a thought! Keep your opinions to yourself! No one gives a rats ass what you think pal. Originally Posted by Izman2014

You can take it to the bank he has discussed ROS with providers! His own words belay that!

You can take it to the bank he has discussed ROS with providers! His own words belay that! Originally Posted by Louigi

It sounds to me a certain snitch needs to be banned or at least have their access revoked! Again, IJS!

I have said nothing about ROS or anything specific to the reviews.... Just the fact that 2 No reviews exist....

keep trying though..... Have another beer Louigi... our too lonely again.... Crank out any fake reviews lately?

I've turned buddies in when i found they discussed ROS... I support the design of the board and follow the guidelines whether I agree with them or not.

Now how would I know that? For that matter, how would anyone else reading this? How about pointing out the reviews in question or asking the posters of those reviews. I'm just commenting on the only thing comment-able without specifics - whether your premise that there is such a conspiracy possible that would include 2 (TWO) guys paying for a session for the sole purpose of NO reviews. I know people do crazy things in this hobby, but that stretches quite a bit.

As for "stories" you've "heard", do you expect someone seeking your assistance would say "Yup, I sucked, review is right". Belies the whole premise of this thread.

He said/she said happens all the time - is it possible they are legit experiences and the provider(s) in question are involving you to obfuscate for them instead of posting their side in a coed post? Of course, it also sounds like they may have access to ROS and or other PRIVATE comments - but that's to be expected, I guess. Originally Posted by Netx9

Seems like plenty knew pretty darn quick which reviews.... I'm sorry.... Slave does not let you think for yourself huh?

And you are stretching to say that anyone knew contents of ROS..... It was questioned because of two Nos from guys that are regulars of a lady at the center of a lot of controversy of a lady that is described as very similar in age, body type and appearance....

Ooops!

You have us all at a disadvantage, W. You ask a question that no one can really answer with any specificity because you offer just a binary choice... Hired guns -or - coincidence, and of course no info on the provider, reviews or reviewers and given that it is a thread started by you, the odds it is motivated by SG are pretty high.

Ergo, you're not interested in suggestions or answers, just rank conjecture with zero evidence of the "bad" option in your title to draw more attention, however justified it might be or not, to the object of your ire. Given your "target", just because someone describes another provider similarly doesn't mean there is "competition" in the minds of either gal to be the top in whatever demographic (age/hair/body style) they inhabit. More "netx9 type questions:

- did the provider contact her reviewers? If so, what was the outcome?
- did you? Outcome?
- have you met her?
- have you met the reviewers?
- do you believe her more than you believe the reviews, simply because the gents are regulars of a certain provider?
- does either guy have a history that you know of fabricating reviews?
- if your implication is that the reviewers are hired guns motivated to tarnish the reputation of perceived competition, why would they not give all provider NO reviews? How many other reviews do they have?
- do you have any evidence to support the idea that the provider the reviewers are regulars of perceives the doppelganger as a 'threat'?

More details and answers to some of these questions may give you better answers to your own questions, without giving away who the parties are... If you're interested in that.... If not, I guess that's the whole reason for this thread... Not info or advice, just another stink cloud of guilt by association and innuendo.

You have us all at a disadvantage, W. You ask a question that no one can really answer with any specificity because you offer just a binary choice... Hired guns -or - coincidence, and of course no info on the provider, reviews or reviewers and given that it is a thread started by you, the odds it is motivated by SG are pretty high.

The question was generic and did not require specifics...... Some of you manage to plug Slave G into everything though which is cool. saves my having to do it...


Ergo, you're not interested in suggestions or answers, just rank conjecture with zero evidence of the "bad" option in your title to draw more attention, however justified it might be or not, to the object of your ire. Given your "target", just because someone describes another provider similarly doesn't mean there is "competition" in the minds of either gal to be the top in whatever demographic (age/hair/body style) they inhabit. More "netx9 type questions: of course... never answers..... just spin....

- did the provider contact her reviewers? If so, what was the outcome? I have no idea.... The question I posed was did either contact her to try a resolution BEFORE the No review... That seems to be the typical WK suggestion when someone writes a Negative Review...
- did you? Outcome? One of them contacted me... he has a totally different tail the she....
- have you met her? Nope
- have you met the reviewers? Nope
- do you believe her more than you believe the reviews, simply because the gents are regulars of a certain provider? I don't know whop to believe. I simply believe that the questions posed by others have some validity.....
- does either guy have a history that you know of fabricating reviews? I do not believe that EVERY review written by a few here.. Dr. Dew, Louigi and you included are accurate reviews of your time spent with someone. They are too quickly cranked out in the midst of issues... well timed concoctions IMO..... Just my opinion...
- if your implication is that the reviewers are hired guns motivated to tarnish the reputation of perceived competition, why would they not give all provider NO reviews? How many other reviews do they have? This particular Provider is said to pose more of a threat to SG's business than others from what I have heard. One lady witnessed an incident at a social where the "victim" made the horrendous mistake of speaking with a SG Regular.... and here I thought you were all issued name badges that read "Property of...." to avoid that
- do you have any evidence to support the idea that the provider the reviewers are regulars of perceives the doppelganger as a 'threat'? LOL! Evidence here on ECCIE? We have no "evidence" of much of anything here..... Is the situation presented very similar in nature to others stories presented by others and believable? Yes...

More details and answers to some of these questions may give you better answers to your own questions, without giving away who the parties are... If you're interested in that.... If not, I guess that's the whole reason for this thread... Not info or advice, just another stink cloud of guilt by association and innuendo. Originally Posted by Netx9

Guilt none the same though in a lot of folks eyes.....

Originally Posted by Whispers

Same song; different verse.

Originally Posted by Louigi