If your provider wasn't a provider, would you give her a second look?

It would be like going to a bar knowing before hand knowing that she was a working girl but would you talk to her anyways? Originally Posted by rrabbit6926

That was not the question love and no it's not the same. The situation I laid out was NOT knowing that she was a working girl. Would you give her a second look? It also has nothing to do with chemistry - I'm talking about looks here. You haven't even spoke to her yet at this point.

rrabitt. . . LMAO

That was not the question love and no it's not the same. The situation I laid out was NOT knowing that she was a working girl. Would you give her a second look? It also has nothing to do with chemistry - I'm talking about looks here. You haven't even spoke to her yet at this point. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

I guess I would give it a shot if I felt there was something there and I was somewhat attracted to her. We guys usually have a rating scale. On the low end- she is doable is I was wasted. On the high end- I'll take a pitty fuck any day of the week .

lMFAO!!! @ Pity fuck.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. While some may find a lady unattractive. Another may find her to be very beautiful.
And there's more to a woman's beauty than just her outer looks.

Just because a woman is considered *hot*. Doesn't mean she's beautiful within. And just because a woman's not a primadonna, doesn't mean she's not a priceless jewel. And there are A LOT of men who look beyond her physical beauty. Some men (in this adult lifestyle) look for the qualities within her and what she's about as a means of picking a woman to spend time with.


And just because a woman in this lifestyle, may not be attractive to some. Doesn't mean that she'll do anything under the sun. She may very well be a woman who embraces her body, her womanhood and enjoys sex & the company of men.

Well there are a lot of attractive ladies here on eccie. However, there are also very unattractive ladies here that charge $200 an hour and up. I always wonder if the guys that see them would give them a second look if they weren't providers. I've noticed that the unattractive ones are more willing to do everything under the sun than an attractive provider that won't do -- say err greek or CIM for example.

I have read reviews that said "She's not a looker in the face but her ass was fat and I wanted to be up in that" - Well something like that. This has led me to believe that a lot of men really do not care as long as the price is right and she's game.

Well it's also true what they say - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - Right? Originally Posted by Naomi4u

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. While some may find a lady unattractive. Another may find her to be very beautiful.
And there's more to a woman's beauty than just her outer looks. Originally Posted by Wicked Milf

Agreed - Or (again referring to the provider world) they could be more interested in her menu.

Just because a woman is considered *hot*. Doesn't mean she's beautiful within. And just because a woman's not a primadonna, doesn't mean she's not a priceless jewel. And there are A LOT of men who look beyond her physical beauty. Some men (in this adult lifestyle) look for the qualities within her and what she's about as a means of picking a woman to spend time with.

Agreed.

Though I have also heard that most men have really low standards when it comes to looks and even performance.

And just because a woman in this lifestyle, may not be attractive to some. Doesn't mean that she'll do anything under the sun.

My comment regarding this didn't apply to all but it most definitely applies to a lot. A lot of ladies DO use their menu to compensate for their looks. They KNOW what they can and cannot get. This is just fact.

Just because I am "attractive" doesn't mean I won't perform well for a client. I don't need my looks to compensate for my services because I perform just as great as I look. I know a lot of attractive women that rely on their looks to get them over - I don't do that.

I am older, not a perfect body(I wish) but Ive never been told I have a "butterface." I know that I must have something going for me because I have a consistent amount of emails with requests. I meet many men whom I would love to have met in another situation and they feel the same. Its weird that the guy would pay those he wouldnt give a 2nd look too otherwise. I would have thought that men being so visual that he would have to have some sort of attraction to her to perform. But, if she feels her looks hinder her business and she has to offer more for less then I feel sorry for the person, and maybe she needs to find another profession, since she is totally just being used as an object with no regards to her being human. There is a person inside of that body ya know, and Im sure its emotionally painful for her to feel as if she has no other choice but to sell herself completely.

I came up with the 85% figure from girls I have already seen. Guys, what percent of the girls you have seen would have attracted you on the open market. She is not looking for philosophy here.

I came up with the 85% figure from girls I have already seen. Guys, what percent of the girls you have seen would have attracted you on the open market. She is not looking for philosophy here. Originally Posted by FlectiNonFrangi

I would say 100% of the ones I was able to see pictures beforehand. Although I'm not one to gamble. I've had long droughts due to not seeing anyone I thought was worth it. Once someone mentioned bringing a friend and she said she would as pretty as her (big lie). And then all of the pre-internet days where it was make the call and pray she was pretty days.

If I wouldn't give a second look, I damn sure wouldn't give her my money either.

VERY interesting Naomi!

First let me say, I don't like ugly chicks! Second I don't care for gals with shity personalities! That being said...

YES!!!

Forgive me if this topic has already been discussed.

A friend of mine told me today that he pays a lot of women that he wouldn't give a second look in a normal situation. i asked him why? He said it was because they were willing to do everything under the sun and they had good reviews.

Fellas, my question to you today is : If the lady you currently pay to see wasn't an escort, would you give her a second look in a normal/everyday situation? Originally Posted by Naomi4u

Yes I would definitely give her a second look. The attraction for me is the same in our out of the hobby. I only wish those women outside of the hobby would give me a second look

Absolutely. I choose to spend time with those that I would imagine would like me as well.

It depends. There have been times when I've been with providers that I knew weren't 9s or 10s. I normally wouldn't give them a second look, BUT based on reviews and recommendations, I enthusiastically met with them (and had a good time). In these situations, the sex is more important than who it is with-- I just want to have a good fuck from someone who is really good at it. Looks aren't important. Other times though, I want to fuck the homecoming queen (with apologizes to Sean Connery in The Rock). In those cases, I want to get off with the hottest chick around. Personally, I try to seek out provider to whom I'm physically attracted. It's human DNA and boosts the self esteem.

I am a pretty shallow guy and looks are important to me. The overwhelming majority of the providers I have seen have ranged from very attractive (7.5) to actual model quality (9.0). I have been in public with a few and have seen how guys, and women, pay attention to my "dates".

I also have not found an inverse relationship between performance and looks. The pretty ones are just as lusty and knotty as the rest, and again, as a group, my lady friends have been highly accomplished and willing sexual partners.

It strikes me as both sad and perverse that a man would willingly pay to have sex with a woman he didn't find attractive. (I am not counting the odd mistaken choice). It seems like there is some self-loathing going on when the a guy deliberately chooses someone for whom he has no visual attraction. What a waste of money and libido.

One truism is that most reviewers grossly over rate the beauty of their subjects. The last two ladies I saw were described the usual superlatives such as "beautiful", "stunning" and "gorgeous" and It just isn't true. Both are quite attractive girls who get many second looks but they just aren't model quality lookers. However both ladies are superlative performers with delightful personalities and those qualities when combined with their accessible good looks make them high quality escorts.

So, yeah, I don't want to see an escort who I wouldn't pay attention to in real life.