Muslim couple denied Swiss citizenship over handshake refusal

I wonder how many liberals on this site aren't working, contributing to the country and deigning to destroy the souls of Americans, friendly fred.

At the same time, I wonder how many unemployed conservatives are out there. How many conservatives who, like you, don't support anything that benefits liberals even peripherally are currently receiving any benefit from the government in any way? Like Medicare, Social Security, public education, law enforcement, etc.

In my opinion, that's an unfair generalization of both sides. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

answer! 1 liberal and no conseratives

Wow. Now we know!

LOL!

Islam is a horrible, backwards religion. I'm not sure why liberals support it since it's ulta conservative, anti women, and anti gay.

Islam is a horrible, backwards religion. I'm not sure why liberals support it since it's ulta conservative, anti women, and anti gay. Originally Posted by Turd Ferguson ATX

It's not a question of supporting Islam, or any other specific religion. In this country we have a freedom to follow the religion of our choice. THAT is what I support.

Me too!

It is the American Way.

According to your source magazine (which, btw, is liberally quoted on the blog, Russia Insider), which US organizations are paying for these atrocities?

Certainly you're not inferring through this that US taxpayers are paying for this, are you? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

apparently the answer is yes.


I think State Dept. is the one handling that.


FOIA search would reveal it unless it has been classified.

I wonder how many liberals on this site aren't working, contributing to the country and deigning to destroy the souls of Americans, friendly fred.

At the same time, I wonder how many unemployed conservatives are out there. How many conservatives who, like you, don't support anything that benefits liberals even peripherally are currently receiving any benefit from the government in any way? Like Medicare, Social Security, public education, law enforcement, etc.

In my opinion, that's an unfair generalization of both sides. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I certainly segregate those who have paid taxes and receive legitimate government services from those who through shiftless, lazy and predatory group practices tend to receive disproportionate consideration from the government in return for their vote whilst paying no income tax to earn that vote. Such practices tarnish and demean the flag and all who hold its truths to be sacred and honorable.

Let he who is among us who doesn't pay income tax refrain from voting in incorrigible politicians who steal money from the productive and give to the wretched poor, thus continuing their dependency and robbing them of the dignity of self support.