. Originally Posted by I B Hankering"Arrested...?" That's all you got...?
"Arrested...?" That's all you got...? Originally Posted by andymarksman
"Dismissed" is even better... Lieber Heinrich.... Originally Posted by andymarksmanWow! So now little Nazi Boi and his fellow dimotards are stooping so low they will even rush to defend a gaymo POS accused of repeatedly raping (forbidden subject)???
Wow! So now little Nazi Boi and his fellow dimotards are stooping so low they will even rush to defend a gaymo POS accused of repeatedly raping (forbidden subject)???Where did I ever rush "to defend a gaymo POS accused of repeatedly raping (forbidden subject)???" I was merely asking someone a "question," then corrected that person's statement with a "final outcome," that is all. The offering of $200,000 for settlement doesn't mean shit under the scrutiny of the Sun. If the "victim" and the prosecutors were so confident in their "cause," they would have gone all the way to secure a criminal conviction, then recouped millions in "future" civil proceedings. That's matter-of-fact for that matter, period.
It was bad enough when they excused and defended Slick Willy's unfettered serial rapist compulsions! Now it's literally - anything goes! So long as you are an LGBT activist and fund-raiser for the unprincipled gay-loving Dims - all is overlooked and forgiven!
LOWER THE BAR, LITTLE NAZI BOI! LOWER THE BAR!
Define deviancy down, little Nazi boi!
Oh wait, I heard a thud! Does that mean the bar can't go any lower?
. Originally Posted by lustylad
Then he is as innocent as Kobe under the law, period. Originally Posted by andymarksmanThat he had to pay $200,000 to get the charges dropped because he couldn't defend himself in a court of law makes him guilty as sin in the court of public opinion, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Fascinating how your ilk will defend a POS to protect the image of your overlord, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
That he had to pay $200,000 to get the charges dropped because he couldn't defend himself in a court of law makes him guilty as sin in the court of public opinion, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Fascinating how your ilk will defend a POS to protect the image of your overlord, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.Just like they continue to make excuses for and defend Lil Cotex's hero Slick Willy Clinton !
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Where did I ever rush "to defend a gaymo POS accused of repeatedly raping (forbidden subject)???" I was merely asking someone a "question," then corrected that person's statement with a "final outcome," that is all. The offering of $200,000 for settlement doesn't mean shit under the scrutiny of the Sun. If the "victim" and the prosecutors were so confident in their "cause," they would have gone all the way to secure a criminal conviction, then recouped millions in "future" civil proceedings. That's matter-of-fact for that matter, period. Originally Posted by andymarksmanHow callous and insensitive of you, little Nazi boi! Have you no EMPATHY for the victim of your Dimotard-fag-fuhrer's sick, perverted behavior? Would you have been so eager and willing to take the witness stand against the much older (67 versus 15), politically powerful and connected Dimotard-fag-fuhrer of Portland, Oregon? Would you want to be traumatized all over again as you recounted your horrific rape experiences in a public courtroom? Would you relish the chance to be brutally cross-examined and humiliated by the Dimotard-fag-fuhrer's expensive legal team?
That he had to pay $200,000 to get the charges dropped because he couldn't defend himself in a court of law makes him guilty as sin in the court of public opinion, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Fascinating how your ilk will defend a POS to protect the image of your overlord, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.Did he pay $200,000 "to get the charges dropped?" The offering of $225,000 was jointly proposed by both the "victim" and the "accused" to have the criminal charges resolved without criminal convictions, which was allowed under Oregon law. But that proposal was rejected outright by the prosecution; therefore there was never a settlement, none. So I maintain my stance that the "accused" is not guilty in a court of law nor in the court of public opinion, other than the fact that he is a gay.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Did he pay $200,000 "to get the charges dropped?" The offering of $225,000 was jointly proposed by both the "victim" and the "accused" to have the criminal charges resolved without criminal convictions, which was allowed under Oregon law. But that proposal was rejected outright by the prosecution; therefore there was never a settlement, none. So I maintain my stance that the "accused" is not guilty in a court of law nor in the court of public opinion, other than the fact that he is a gay. Originally Posted by andymarksmanWere the charges dismissed after he forfeited $200,000? Yes, they were! He paid, and the charges were dropped. Hence, every intelligent person knows that if he could have proved his innocence, he would have gone to court and proved his accuser was a liar. Thus, in the eyes of intelligent observers, he is guilty.