Again, I'm curious as to what good this "cop test" does? Is it presumed that if she is a cop, she will not flash you and you will simply walk back to your car and drive away? Is it also presumed that cops won't let you touch them? Originally Posted by Lily BlairIf a guys shows up at a sting and knocks on the door, he almost surely will be arrested before leaving. There is no contention there. The only thing he can do at that point is avoid incriminating himself. He will be arrested, but may be able to get the charges dropped or win a trial if he never breaks the law by soliciting sex for money.
I'm just trying to understand the logic here, because it really makes absolutely no sense. I mean, why dont you ask her to stand on one foot and scratch her head to make sure she isn't a rooster? Originally Posted by Lily BlairI know from reading your comments and seeing your website that you are very intelligent. I think you do understand the logic, but instead find it silly and stupid. I have to agree, as all of this can be easily avoided.
There have been many examples cited before of LE going through with an entire session before busting a lady. Others where there were multiple sessions to "build a case" against her. Happens often in AMP's and occasionally with independent ladies. I short, the "cop check" means absolutely nothing and history is littered with the records of men and women who were busted for their belief that doing so actually proved anything.
The real fact of the matter if you show up at or if a sting is brought to you, you ARE going downtown. It doesn't matter what you say or don't say, if she flashes a tit or grabs your cock. An arrest is going to happen, its the prosecutors problem after that. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser
And I would disagree. Cops expose themselves and let you touch them all the time. So no, there is no logic in asking them to do so, and in fact could actually incriminate you further. Originally Posted by Lily BlairI can't help but wonder, after reading these responses, how a community would feel about their police officers completing an act or committing an act of indecency. I could just imagine letters to the editor "They using our tax dollars to pay for ____" Not to mention how a prosecutor, who should appear squeaky clean to a jury, is going to justify officers having multiple acts. Maybe because I live in the bible belt it's different here, but I would think the community would be in an uproar. I would be upset myself. I think the police's public image would prevail and most departments wouldn't allow an officer to cross the line. Imagine what would happen if his mark was underage! Just like it's a crime for an adult to engage in sexual relations with a minor, even if they have fake ID, even if they said they were over 18, it would be the same for an officer.
Diablo, I'm in the same boat as you I think. New, and not quite knowing how to get rolling with the references, without somebody taking a chance on you. From reading everybody's posts, I'm guessing look for someone that says newbie friendly? My thinking was to invite/meet them for drinks beforehand and just talk, hopefully setting everybody at ease and building some kind of rapport. This sound like a good plan for getting started? Originally Posted by stxfarmboy
I can't help but wonder, after reading these responses, how a community would feel about their police officers completing an act or committing an act of indecency. I could just imagine letters to the editor "They using our tax dollars to pay for ____" Not to mention how a prosecutor, who should appear squeaky clean to a jury, is going to justify officers having multiple acts. Maybe because I live in the bible belt it's different here, but I would think the community would be in an uproar. I would be upset myself. I think the police's public image would prevail and most departments wouldn't allow an officer to cross the line. Imagine what would happen if his mark was underage! Just like it's a crime for an adult to engage in sexual relations with a minor, even if they have fake ID, even if they said they were over 18, it would be the same for an officer.There's the rub. Most PD's have a local policy detailing what they will allow and how far to take it. Not a law, but an internal policy. The community outcry can be and has been very loud. I recall one case, in GA, where the local chief and several officers were canned by the city council for going way overboard on an AMP sting. Multiple visits from all of them while they "built their case", all on the taxpayers dime.
What would the religious community have to say about that come Sunday morning?
That's not to say that some department won't try it, I just would love to see it happen and read the newspapers' letters to the editor when it happens. Originally Posted by MartenWarner
There's the rub. Most PD's have a local policy detailing what they will allow and how far to take it. Not a law, but an internal policy. The community outcry can be and has been very loud. I recall one case, in GA, where the local chief and several officers were canned by the city council for going way overboard on an AMP sting. Multiple visits from all of them while they "built their case", all on the taxpayers dime.That has to be in Macon, GA. The AMP's went crazy there. It's one thing to post a sign that says "VIP Massage," but then they started some kind of advertising war and you couldn't help, but get a hard-on driving down I-75 and seeing the billboards. They were THAT SUGGESTIVE! I kept thinking to myself, "are they crazy, you can't put signs up like that and expect the community to not say anything." Sure enough, there was a huge bust.
There have been other cases I know about in Nashville with street ladies, with similar results. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser