...YOU ASKING IF ANYONE OBJECTS TO ANYTHING YOU DO BLOWS MY MIND ... ACTAULLY.
...and I had JUST HAD CONVERSATION WITH SELF ABOUT YOU.. OUTLOUD.
Originally Posted by _Jayne_
Hi Jayne, I wasn't sure who "Jayne" was but I'd recognize your Flow of Consciousness style (minus the Flow
) anywhere. lol
I don't know how to say this, but the idea that my name comes up in your conversations with self is not exactly a peaceful one for me. Still it's good to hear from you.
I wasn't asking permission to be promiscuous, of course. I was simply wondering if anyone would automatically draw the conclusion that I was troubled or neurotic.
First, I think that it's absolute great that you're such a sexual animal...I have heard that in other countries, people's attitudes about sex isn't as screwed up as ours are. Maybe that is true and maybe it isn't.
Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers
Thanks for the thoughtful input, EW.
All animals are sexual, including those that are homosexual, bisexual, hermaphroditic and asexual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sexual_behaviour But as far as I know humans are the only animals that engage in moral debate and shame one another for their "aberrant" proclivities. A moral consciousness is essential to humaness, no question we'd be lost without it. But so much of the natural moral code (evolved over eons) has been co-opted by individuals and institutions that have (or had) motives well beyond individual sexual happiness and natural fulfillment.
Sex is power. Anyone or any institution that can tell me whom, when, how and for what reasons I am allowed to fuck has me by the balls, so to speak. Once that power is institutionalized, it's peanuts to coerce me into sacrificing my money (or my first born son) or even my life to promote my master's goals.
That's the old, "boys will be boys" argument which historically doesn't seem to be effective with wives...
Originally Posted by FLWrite
Hmm seems to me you're definition of "historically" doesn't extend very far...sure you didn't mean hysterically?
There are notable cultures (think Greeks and Romans) where "men will be men" was the gospel and no one questioned it.
...every peron is entirely different.
...For decades that was the only emotional happiness I would feel. After therapy, now I hobby because it feels good, while still able to find happiness in other corners of life.
...If your brain can only be satisfied by a certain mix of released endorphines brought about by a certain activity, then you don't care what it takes to keep that activity going. Family, friends, emotional stability mean nothing once the need takes over.
Originally Posted by Txn5inThick
Just a couple of notes:
Every person is also remarkably similar. If you study lots of them over a long period of time and in different cultures they aren't very hard to understand, particularly in broad strokes, which is what I'm talking about.
I'm glad that therapy improved your sex life, but are you saying you had a sex problem? Sounds to me like there was some emotional expansion that took place that enabled many activities to be pleasurable. Just because you found sex first and weren't particularly motivated to grow beyond that doesn't mean that sex was the problem, does it? I'd be interested to know what approach your therapist took. Religious? Addiction model?
If one's brain can
only be satisfied by sexual endorphins he does indeed have a problem and might consult an endocrinologist or neurologist, but I imagine that is really rare. Obviously, it wasn't the case in your life
...Mother nature devised a method to insure that we breed and create more! This does not mean that all will use it in a compassionate and humane way.
And to The lovely ladies that accomodate me when I yield to the basic urge to procreate I say thank you!
Originally Posted by rednecksatyr
Pal, momma nature's approach to anything is "red of claw and tooth!" Compassion and humaneness are late late additions and get folded up pretty quickly when the chips are down.
...Addiction is a three part disease - mental, physical and spiritual...It becomes a vicious cycle, repeating over and over - often despite great personal suffering and consequences as a result of their actions. For the sex addict the act is not about having sex, its pleasures and intimacy; but rather about a separate "high" the person feels...a high that is increasingly difficult to reach, requiring more use, more risks and more consequences.
Originally Posted by BadWolf
Dude, you left "shame" out of your little sex cycle. You are using the religious moral model, just like they taught me in church. And what do you mean by spiritual, anyway?
There is truth in the cycle you describe, of course, and any destructive behavior needs attention. Identifying a cycle or sequence of events may have some therapeutic value in stopping or shortcutting destructive actions, but it can accomplish that and leave the individual a conflicted mess sexually.
But I now believe that you are neither bad nor much of a wolf.
Edit: China Doll, sorry to see you go. It is frustrating though, isn't it, to just agree on definitions. Unfortunately, it is those definitions and the critical presuppositions from which they sprang that keep folks thinking in the box about sex.
Sex research is the most underfunded super-important subject I'm aware of. (See
http://www.amazon.com/Bonk-Curious-C.../dp/0393064646 for a good read on the matter. I know I know...standard psychiatric definitions provide a lot of security and make discussion easier. You are aware, aren't you, that those definitions, by and large, are the product of straight white men very much molded by their moral environment and/or the the interest in fund granting agencies to support their research.
Anyway, I don't mean to keep yapping as you leave. Peace.