... See? ... Tiny is once again being level-headed about this.
Things will be a bit different on appeal.
These runaway jury awards are keen! ... Why not just make it 200 or
300 Million - it's all a ten-a-penny dream. ...
#### Salty
For the sake of argument say he didn’t sexually assault her. If that’s the case, should he have to pay damages for defamation? Originally Posted by Tiny... Yer spot-on analogy brings me to a similar point.
This trial wasn't about the sexual assault.
This judgment was for defamation. Trump is the poster child for defamation. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
]Nobody knows what if anything happened at the Department Store except Carroll and Trump.[/B] But Trump and his attorneys weren’t allowed to question whether Carroll was lying at the trial. The jury had to accept with certainty that Trump raped her. Is that Orwellian or what? If I weren’t posting from a cell phone I’d link to LustyLad’s Kangaroo Court post. Originally Posted by Tiny;1063409307[B
For the sake of argument say he didn’t sexually assault her. If that’s the case, should he have to pay damages for defamation?She made the whole damned thing up.
This is a whole lot different from Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. We can be pretty confident they weren’t lying. I suspect Carroll was lying or exaggerating. Originally Posted by Tiny
She was paid to make the whole damned thing up.
Trump is adamant because he knows he did not do what this lame ass jury convicted him of. Originally Posted by Jackie S