I disagree that hedonism per se is materialistic, it can also be spiritual (if you believe in spirits)
Originally Posted by ninasastri
Interestingly I have no opinion on whether we have "souls" in the mystical sense or not. It goes along with answering the question: Is there a God? The answer to either is, at least for now, unreachable, and does not one way or another change my choices. By saying "spiritual" I mean more that we are sentient beings, and as such, fulfillment (to me) is more then pleasure
I think the society of obligations is putting people beyond the pure measurement of "roles" for a special society they have to fulfill
Originally Posted by ninasastri
Thank goodness for that, it will be interesting to see how this evolves as generations pass.
There are - however- different streams in religions - one that are ascetic and ones that are pleasure-fulfillments, i do think something like responsible hedonism is catering to the less ascetic (askese - what s the word in english) parts of religious experiments. So your statement is - i think based on the asketic (non pleasure seeking religions) and not representable for the other relgions that enhance hedonism.
I agree that pleasure is absolutely essential to well being. However, a philosophy of pleasure alone is far too limiting for growth and the consideration of others.
Being of Pagan roots, I believe the answer always lies in the balance of opposing forces, and that all faiths deserve to be heard, even if not subscribed to.
They also are influenced by societal change and what was good therapy decades ago is not good therapy nowadays. Do i think therapists trigger change and its their great and creative idea to tell married partners to do things apart from each other?
Therapists are also bound to - or limited by - societies approach to topics. ANd instead of telling people to get a divorce or become polyamorous (not cheaters) they support the idea of life long marriages and are against divorce creatively trying to bring no matter how screwed up ideas into the therapy room to keep couples together.
I would have to disagree with this sentiment. I believe therapy can cause damage, but it has enormous potential for good. Not all therapists are mindless products of their education and society. It comes down to the therapist. Upon the discovery that I was and escort at the age of 18, I was dragged into therapy.
The therapist supported my choice, reminding my family that being gay was once illegal. That a law being in existence does not make an act in and of itself wrong, that my sexual and financial life is private as it is for any other citizen in society.
I have also three times met gentlemen who started to hobby when their therapist suggested it as an outlet for sexual pleasure and for a chance to have fun, and laugh and take care of the needs their partner could not.
I have endlessly heard men state that their couples counsellor or individual therapist tell them to end a marriage because it was hopeless.
How long was your longest relationship , Lauren? Why did it break? What was the normative context of said relationships? Heteronormativity, polyamory, Cheating? so i mean - i personally am all for the flaws of reality. Speaking words of wisdom that a book has written is much easier than living :-)
Intimate questions of a forum, and thus I'll assume they are rhetorical
I
definitely agree that the culture of self help books is venomous. I haven't ever read one - my sibling for a short time became addicted and it was nauseating to hear him speak after a while, he knew all the lingo and was absorbed by the absurdity of "thinking positive". I also can't say I've ever read a therapists book. I have a great fascination with psychology, but pop-psychology is not to my taste. The Dr. Phil's of the world be damned.
I get the sense that you believe I'm someone who depends on therapeutic literature - which is far from true. I am merely curious about the interesting new trends in the papers I see, suggesting that the individual is an important aspect of the relationship - which is quite different from the traditional take on matters.
Reality is endless with it's flaws, as are the book we read. However, the ones I read are not the working of popular culture - some works have survived for a miraculously long time, because they contain within them words that are worth digesting - regardless of what your end conclusion is.
I do enjoy your posts