FOX firings coming ?

You really went there mate??? It may be a real s t r e t c h for you, but what does NBC ABC and CBS mean to you??? (Just Google one) I typed this really really s l o w just for you. So now you can continue to copy and paste and copy and paste and...24/7/365

I mean who knew CNN was on cable

Fox cable news. Never mainstream and the only extreme mega gop station on "cable tv" for those who do not want real news

bahahahahhahaaaaaaa

what does CNN stand for? wait for it ....





CNN (Cable News Network)


bahahahahahaa


FOX is pretty much the only cable news network not swimming in red ink and laying off their "top" talent. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Because Fox viewers are like mushrooms......


kept in the dark.........




and fed bullshit!!

Because Fox viewers are like mushrooms......


kept in the dark.........




and fed bullshit!!




Originally Posted by matchingmole

if you say so

amusing. why exactly should FOX, by far number 1 in cable news, fire any of their also top rated hosts?


asking for Rupert Murdoch. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

if you say so

None of them are going anywhere. Fox can’t get rid of them because they have too many viewers. Fox should just drop News from their name and they would be just fine. If they quit the pretense then they could just go about their business as usual without the fear of looking like shills. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

That would be truth in advertising.

if you say so Originally Posted by VitaMan

No. If *YOU* say so.

amusing. why exactly should FOX, by far number 1 in cable news, fire any of their also top rated hosts?


asking for Rupert Murdoch. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

well, fox did fire 2 important people, bill o' rielly (in top 10 ranking) and roger ailes (top network ranking) but that was over a female handling scandal.

then don't watch. FOX will still be number one by a mile in the one thing that counts.

ratings.

and just so our "left handed" friends here know, FOX has been number one for 20 years in a row.

watching people flail about that "Trump made FOX Number One" will have a hard time explaining that, yes?

bahahahaha Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

20 year #1 run by fox, thats a record and still will be. that run ended I think 2 years ago when MSNBC managed 1st place in one month. since then fox has been back on track.



Fox should be on another new 20 year run.

20 year #1 run by fox, thats a record and still will be. that run ended I think 2 years ago when MSNBC managed 1st place in one month. since then fox has been back on track.



Fox should be on another new 20 year run. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Truff!

But I think the trumpf murdoch collusion should lead to murdoch and family to have to sell Fox.
hannity tucker wipes and a few more should be fired immediately for helping in this collusion.

I urge everyone to get in touch with their cable companies to let them know these criminals must go from fox.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...045210968.html

Faux cable news can be entertaining on occasion. You just have to really really dumb down

20 year #1 run by fox, thats a record and still will be. that run ended I think 2 years ago when MSNBC managed 1st place in one month. since then fox has been back on track.



Fox should be on another new 20 year run. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

exactly. MSNBC topped the ratings for one lousy month a few years ago. FOX for that year was still number one. so what does that work out to for that year monthly?


FOX 11 MSNBC 1


BAHHAAAA

Truff!

But I think the trumpf murdoch collusion should lead to murdoch and family to have to sell Fox.
hannity tucker wipes and a few more should be fired immediately for helping in this collusion. Originally Posted by winn dixie

never gonna happen bro. do you think for one moment Murdoch or his son who's really running FOX day to day now are gonna sell? never gonna happen.


you think Congress can force the Murdoch's to sell? force FOX off the air?


never gonna happen.

well, fox did fire 2 important people, bill o' rielly (in top 10 ranking) and roger ailes (top network ranking) but that was over a female handling scandal. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Roger Ailes wasn't an on air personality like O'Reily, he was the president of FOX News. O'Reily was gone by Sept 2017 barely a year into Trump's Presidency and Ailes in 2016 before the election.


try as the left might, O'Reily and Ailes had nothing to do with Trump they were long gone by 2020. they can't make a case about it.


from a certain point of view in O'Reily's case it would be interesting to see what his opinion privately was about the 2020 election vs. what he may have said on air about it.

I miss Bill O'Reilly

One of the best all time

exactly. MSNBC topped the ratings for one lousy month a few years ago. FOX for that year was still number one. so what does that work out to for that year monthly?


FOX 11 MSNBC 1


BAHHAAAA





never gonna happen bro. do you think for one moment Murdoch or his son who's really running FOX day to day now are gonna sell? never gonna happen.


you think Congress can force the Murdoch's to sell? force FOX off the air?


never gonna happen.





Roger Ailes wasn't an on air personality like O'Reily, he was the president of FOX News. O'Reily was gone by Sept 2017 barely a year into Trump's Presidency and Ailes in 2016 before the election.


try as the left might, O'Reily and Ailes had nothing to do with Trump they were long gone by 2020. they can't make a case about it.


from a certain point of view in O'Reily's case it would be interesting to see what his opinion privately was about the 2020 election vs. what he may have said on air about it. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Fox has high ratings...yet it still sucks.....how can one explain this dichotomy?

Fox has high ratings...yet it still sucks.....how can one explain this dichotomy? Originally Posted by matchingmole

Most fair and balanced reporting until they sold their souls to trumpf. Still they have lead in ratings and will continue to do so.