Trump/Russia Collusion Is a Big Hoax

You so fucking WOKE

Trump does not want this in court where he may have to testify under oath. Exactly why he didn't sue Stormy Originally Posted by WTF

And she had to pay him how much...

https://www.npr.org/2018/12/11/67587...mation-lawsuit

Fucking jokes on you...

And she had to pay him how much...

https://www.npr.org/2018/12/11/67587...mation-lawsuit

Fucking jokes on you... Originally Posted by bb1961

Trump did not sue Stormy.

I said Trump would not sue over the Steele dossier. I stand by my statement.

The Judge in this case awarded attorney fees. The case was about his tweet concerning her alleged attack by some strong arm.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ump-legal-fees

Also...Trump and Michael Avenatti can not collect from her 450k settlement with Ohio police over her strip club arrest settlement.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2020...3141591315581/

- A federal judge in Ohio on Thursday denied President Donald Trump access to funds adult film actress Stormy Daniels received in a legal settlement.

U.S. District Judge Michael Watson ruled that Trump cannot claim a portion of the $450,000 settlement to go toward attorney's fees in a separate case between Daniels, who was born Stephanie Clifford, and himself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clifford's former attorney Michael Avenatti also sought to claim a portion of the settlement for outstanding fees for his work representing Clifford in cases against Trump but withdrew his lien.

"Having concluded that neither Avenatti nor Trump currently have an enforceable interest in the settlement funds and that a stay to determine if they will in the future is not warranted, the court hereby directs the Clerk of court to release the funds ... to the plaintiff and her attorneys," Watson wrote.

... Blimey! ... Of course Trump would NOT have
standing to collect any of this - this is HER money.

However, THIS has nothing to do with Stormy
LOSING her defamation case against Trump.
She may have already paid his barristers.

### Salty

... Nor does it have much to do with
the main topic of the thread:

That the liberal media surely played liberals for fools.

### Salty

... Nor does it have much to do with
the main topic of the thread:

That the liberal media surely played liberals for fools.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Are you calling wtf a fool?

Tell us something we don't already know!

... No, not calling ANYONE here one - not directly.
I meant the liberals nation-wide, who surely BELIEVED
the false bullshit narrative the media was pushing.

And if some o' those people are here in the forum...
So be it.

That ol' Australian philosopher bloke Confuchess had a saying:
"Fool them once - que sera, sera - fool them twice - HA HA HA!"

### Salty