Righties can's stand losing, so they start shooting!

Im gonna quote you on that.

If that's so, then why are the Denver Police currently reviewing surveliance video? Why is the secret service involved?

You people are just comical in your bias.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation...m_national_pop Originally Posted by markroxny

Well they are going to investigate the incident cause a crime was committed. But be realistic if a car fled the scene and it's picked up on camera but the plate wasn't in view there really isn't much to go on. They aren't going to treat this like an Attempt Murder. If an arrest is made, more than likely the charges will be Aggrevated Damage To Property.

Other people described Jared as Lefty, his own rantings and shooting a prominent democrat in the head suggest otherwise.

He was just an anti-government nutjob.

"the government is implying mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar." Loughner's claims in his videos: "I'm able to control every belief and religion by being the mind controller!"

Sorry but your case is not proven IB. You found a random anti-government wacko. Not a hard core democrat.

Ultimately, it seems illegitimate to tie Loughner to the mainstream right or mainstream left, as his beliefs were well within the realm of the fringe. Indeed, Loughner appears to have simply been a disturbed individual who lacked a coherent political philosophy other than a deep-seated anti-government sentiment.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...22-503544.html

Other people described Jared as Lefty, his own rantings and shooting a prominent democrat in the head suggest otherwise.

He was just an anti-government nutjob.



Sorry but your case is not proven IB. You found a random anti-government wacko. Not a hard core democrat.



http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...22-503544.html Originally Posted by markroxny

Case is made, marks-rocks-with-pee. Unlike any journalist you find with a different, agenda driven opinion, Ms Parker KNEW and associated with Loughner for several years.

'Former classmate, Caitie Parker, who attended high school and college with Loughner, described his political views as "left wing, quite liberal," "radical."'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner

Case is made, marks-rocks-with-pee. Unlike any journalist you find with a different, agenda driven opinion, Ms Parker KNEW and associated with Loughner for several years.

'Former classmate, Caitie Parker, who attended high school and college with Loughner, described his political views as "left wing, quite liberal," "radical."'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That's her opinion. If she was such an expert on the guy she would have warned someone he was dangerous.

The guy was an anti-gov wacko.

You Failed IB. Sorry.

Give it up guys. Markie Mark has Kool Aid poisoning. He won't blame a democrat unless their name can be found on a ballot as a candidate for the democratic party....you know, like Fred Phelps.

That's her opinion. If she was such an expert on the guy she would have warned someone he was dangerous.

The guy was an anti-gov wacko.

You Failed IB. Sorry. Originally Posted by markroxny

You failed with your -- this -- thread, marks-rocks-with-pee. First, you gave this thread a title that is not supported by the very evidence you cite. Second, you made an statement embracing an 'absolute' that is not supported by history. Furthermore, marks-rocks-with-pee, you have been unable to diminish Ms Parker's knowing and associating with Loughner for several years. YOUR opinion that your opinion trumps Parker's personal observations of and her experiences with Loughner, marks-rocks-with-pee, is entirely irrelevant.

You failed with your -- this -- thread, marks-rocks-with-pee. First, you gave this thread a title that is not supported by the very evidence you cite. Second, you made an statement embracing an 'absolute' that is not supported by history. Furthermore, marks-rocks-with-pee, you have been unable to diminish Ms Parker's knowing and associating with Loughner for several years. YOUR opinion that your opinion trumps Parker's personal observations of and her experiences with Loughner, marks-rocks-with-pee, is entirely irrelevant. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Marks-rocks-with-pee, FAILED to prove his point in several ways.

First, marks-rocks-with-pee gave this thread a title that is not supported by the very evidence he chose to cite.

Second, marks-rocks-with-pee made a statement embracing an 'absolute' that is not supported by history, e.g., Jared Lee Loughner – a leftist.

Thirdly, marks-rocks-with-pee – who hangs on a corner in his hood in Harlem and has NO personal knowledge of or experiences with Arizona shooter and killer Jared Lee Loughner - a lefty – is of the excessively specious opinion that his opinion some how trumps Parker's years of personal observations of and her experiences with leftist Arizona shooter and killer, Jared Lee Loughner.

Marks-rocks-with-pee failed, and it is his opinion that is entirely irrelevant.

Other people described Jared as Lefty, his own rantings and shooting a prominent democrat in the head suggest otherwise.

He was just an anti-government nutjob.



Sorry but your case is not proven IB. You found a random anti-government wacko. Not a hard core democrat.



http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...22-503544.html Originally Posted by markroxny

He was probably a left handed shooter. Thats probably what they meant, lol. You're dingy man.

You're fogetting somthing IB......when they find the people who did this...and they will....you gonna be proven wrong.

You know nothing of harlem, i dare you to come here so I can beat the living shit out of you...but you wont'...cuz you are a coward.

You're fogetting somthing IB......when they find the people who did this...and they will....you gonna be proven wrong.

You know nothing of harlem, i dare you to come here so I can beat the living shit out of you...but you wont'...cuz you are a coward. Originally Posted by markroxny

Well that was a statement that truly redeems your true character now wasn't it.

You're fogetting somthing IB......when they find the people who did this...and they will....you gonna be proven wrong.

You know nothing of harlem, i dare you to come here so I can beat the living shit out of you...but you wont'...cuz you are a coward. Originally Posted by markroxny

Point is, marks-rocks-with-pee, is that you are ignorantly WRONG NOW!!! No one said a damn thing about what might happen tomorrow. YOU are wrong NOW, and all of your flustered sputtering cannot change that fact!!!

Marks-rocks-with-pee, FAILED to prove his point in several ways.

First, marks-rocks-with-pee gave this thread a title that is not supported by the very evidence he chose to cite.

Second, marks-rocks-with-pee made a statement embracing an 'absolute' that is not supported by history, e.g., Jared Lee Loughner – a leftist.

Thirdly, marks-rocks-with-pee – who hangs on a corner in his hood in Harlem and has NO personal knowledge of or experiences with Arizona shooter and killer Jared Lee Loughner - a lefty – is of the excessively specious opinion that his opinion some how trumps Parker's years of personal observations of and her experiences with leftist Arizona shooter and killer, Jared Lee Loughner.

Marks-rocks-with-pee failed, and it is his opinion that is entirely irrelevant.

What's more, marks-rocks-with-pee, you've demonstrated once again what a true punk you really are as you make empty threats from behind a computer keyboard to physically abuse those who express a different opinion.

Furthermore, you just added another hole to your argument that lefty-loos like you are non-violent sorts and do not seek redress through violence.

It does seem that KarlMarxRoxny likes to resort to violence when confronted with facts. Maybe he's not a liberal.

Confronted with facts? What facts?? LMAO

I'm just letting that pussy know if he wants to say somehting about Harlem, he should know what he's talking about. I'd be glad to teach him....or any of you for that matter.

This thread started addressing the economy. You had to turn it into a thread that focuses on you. I'd say you have self-esteem issues. You might want to see someone about that. Just sayin'.