1st phase of the "BIG UGLY"...

1st phase of the "BIG UGLY"...

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

I hate to tell you Iffy but you are the first , middle and last phase of the Big Ugly.

Try staying in your Big Bloody thread.

The entire enterprise of exposing the corruption and conspiracy has just begun.

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

+1

Let us hope that it is exposes not only the Clintons but the Trumps!

Let us hope it changes Campaign finance laws!

Total Transparency.

I want to be able to follow all your money if you ever decide to get into politics. That includes anything prior.

That is what this really should be a lesson in but many of you will only want to other side exposed, not your side....they can be corrupt as fuck.




.

VERITAS FUCKERS! a 25m video

VERITAS FUCKERS! a 25m video

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

If you think I open much less watch any of your video links, you a fruitier than a nut cake!

If you think I open much less watch any of your video links, you a fruitier than a nut cake! Originally Posted by WTF

Total Transparency. Originally Posted by WTF

Except when dim-retards on the House Intelligence Committee vote no.

#ReleaseTheMemo

This video lays it all out, Bigly!

If you think I open much less watch any of your video links, you a fruitier than a nut cake! Originally Posted by WTF

Except when dim-retards on the House Intelligence Committee vote no.

#ReleaseTheMemo Originally Posted by lustylad

I'm not familiar with committee rules regarding this situation.

when they want to release a classified document, does the vote have to be unanimous or by simple majority?

Doug Ross 🔵
@directorblue

Timing of missing Strzok-Page texts:

Start date: 12/14/16: same date WaPo cites unnamed intel officials stating... wait for it... Russians tried to hack election for Trump.

End date: 5/17/17: same date Mueller is named Special Counsel.

Full timeline: http://tinyurl.com/timelineoftreason …

8:08 PM - Jan 22, 2018
18 18 Replies 258 258 Retweets 290 290 likes

TrumpSoldier
@DaveNYviii

House Judiciary Committee Releases Statement on Missing Texts.#Strzok #StrzokPageTexts #MissingTexts

PDF>https://judiciary.house.gov/press-re...fbi-officials/ …

6:27 PM - Jan 22, 2018
14 14 Replies 185 185 Retweets 205 205 likes

https://twitter.com/DaveNYviii/statu...569990/photo/1

TrumpSoldier
‏

@DaveNYviii
11h11 hours ago
More
#MissingTexts techies and their managers have been squeezed dry of information. So while we keep an eye on the big fish at the top, let's not forget the vulnerable little fish.

3 replies 37 retweets 109 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 37 Like 109 Direct message

TrumpSoldier
‏

@DaveNYviii
11h11 hours ago
More

Demoting and isolating the main conspirators gave the green light to all the underlings. They no longer have any fear from above. They will turn on the now powerless big fish, \some out of self preservation, and others for revenge.

TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2

Justice Roberts will change a whole lot more when he's sure the Obama/Comey FBI FISA surveillance files on him have been destroyed. Watch. The entire tone of top-level national private and public people will change once the blackmail is gone.... https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/sta...71847844098050 …

11:24 PM - Jan 22, 2018
25 25 Replies 220 220 Retweets 338 338 likes

Comey the clown gets a new lawyer...

http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/23/...aims-attorney/

Comey ‘Friend’ Who Leaked FBI Memos Now Claims To Be His Attorney

Daniel Richman, the law professor who leaked classified FBI records to the media at Comey's request, refused to disclose when exactly he became Comey's attorney.

JANUARY 23, 2018 By Sean Davis
A friend of former FBI director James Comey who leaked sensitive FBI memos to The New York Times in the wake of Comey’s firing in 2017 now claims to be Comey’s personal attorney. Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia University, told The Federalist via phone on Tuesday afternoon that he was now personally representing Comey.

The revelation comes in the wake of news that Comey was interviewed by the special counsel’s office last year. According to The New York Times, the line of questioning from the office of special counsel Robert Mueller focused on memos that Comey wrote and later leaked after he was fired from his job by President Donald Trump. A review of FBI policies governing the handling of sensitive government documents suggests Comey violated FBI policy by leaking the memos, which were produced on government time, using government equipment, and directly related to his official government responsibilities, according to Comey’s own testimony before Congress.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who serves as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote in a letter to the Department of Justice on January 3 that at least one of the memos Comey provided to his friend was classified.

“My staff has since reviewed these memoranda in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at the FBI, and I reviewed them in a SCIF at the Office of Senate Security,” Grassley wrote. “The FBI insisted that these reviews take place in a SCIF because the majority of the memos are classified. Of the seven memos, four are marked classified at the ‘SECRET’ or ‘CONFIDENTIAL’ levels.”

“If it’s true that Professor Richman had four of the seven memos, then in light of the fact that four of the seven memos the Committee reviewed are classified, it would appear that at least one memo the former FBI director gave Professor Richman contained classified information,” Grassley noted in the letter.

Reached by phone on Tuesday, Richman refused to say when his legal representation of Comey began or whether he was personally representing Comey when the former FBI director testified before Congress in June 2017 about his deliberate leaking of the FBI records. The specific timing of the attorney-client relationship is important, because it may shield conversations between Comey and Richman regarding the coordinated leak of FBI records to the media from law enforcement scrutiny. Richman’s legal work on behalf of Comey was not known before today, as Comey testified before Congress in 2017 that Richman was merely a friend.

“I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter,” Comey testified last June in response to a question from Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). “Didn’t do it myself, for a variety of reasons.”

“But I asked him to, because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel,” Comey continued. “And so I asked a close friend of mine to do it.”

“Who was that?” Collins asked.

“A good friend of mine who’s a professor at Columbia Law School,” Comey responded.

Despite being given multiple opportunities to do so, Comey never characterized Richman as his attorney, nor did he suggest that his directions to Richman to leak the memos to the media were privileged attorney-client communications. The news that Richman is now representing Comey raises questions about whether the special counsel may be investigating Comey and Richman for their roles in leaking classified information to the news media in order to get revenge on Trump for firing Comey.

The tactic of using attorney-client privilege to shield potentially illegal communications from law enforcement scrutiny is not a new one. During the FBI investigation of then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s potential mishandling of classified information, Cheryl Mills, one of Clinton’s top government aides at the State Department, also claimed that she could not testify about her communications with Clinton on the matter because she was also serving as Clinton’s personal attorney.

“I have nothing to say about any of this,” Richman responded, when asked directly whether attorney-client privilege was being asserted in order to shield his communications with Comey regarding the deliberate leaking of classified documents to the media.

Richman was first licensed to practice law in the state of New York in 1986, according to public records, and his current law license in that state is valid through October 2018.