BENGHAZI HEARINGS; TODAY ON C-SPAN AT

Been discussed already, numerous times. I can't help it if you have a poor memory. Succinctly, (look it up) it is the killing of innocent civilians, American citizens without due process, having a non-independently reviewed "kill list", various lies and corrupt acts, covering up atrocities, maintaining Gitmo (as he promised he wouldn't), maintain CIA prisons around the world, etc. etc.

bla bla .., your opinion, nothing more nothing less.

and my opinion ... fuck Obie for giving W a free pass

Let's have a fair trial, that's all I want. For both of them. You're not opposed to fair trials, are you, CBJ7?

Let's have a fair trial, that's all I want. For both of them. You're not opposed to fair trials, are you, CBJ7? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

absolutely not. As soon as Obie has been proven to commit any war crime akin to W, I say hang them both.. Unlike you, I have the need to actually prove Obie (or any other human) has actually done something that merits a trial before they are sent to court

Trials are where things get proven, CBJ7. Look it up.

Trials are where things get proven, CBJ7. Look it up. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

investigations leading to probable cause are where trials begin .. look it up

ok don't watch the doc, and keep asking stupid ass questions that have already been answered ... that scenario suits you well. You need to get out more, really. Originally Posted by CJ7

HAHA! Actually I did just get out. My last response was hurried because my SB was waiting for me. Just got back and I am feeling good. LOL. You are the one who needs to get out more CBJ7. Like I told you in another thread, you need to quit jerking off to W's "tits" and go out and get laid. It would do you a world of good.

Do you really want to apply US laws to foreign nationals who are terrorists? That argument is beyond stupid! But if so, then killing them with drones, along with innocent civilians, would be in violation of US law. Every effort would have to be made to capture them alive, give them their miranda rights and then try them in civilian courts. Do you see how fucked up that line of reasoning really is?

HAHA! Actually I did just get out. My last response was hurried because my SB was waiting for me. Just got back and I am feeling good. LOL. You are the one who needs to get out more CBJ7. Like I told you in another thread, you need to quit jerking off to W's "tits" and go out and get laid. It would do you a world of good.

Do you really want to apply US laws to foreign nationals who are terrorists? That argument is beyond stupid! But if so, then killing them with drones, along with innocent civilians, would be in violation of US law. Every effort would have to be made to capture them alive, give them their miranda rights and then try them in civilian courts. Do you see how fucked up that line of reasoning really is? Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

so you admit the 24 hour Shock and Awe attack on Baghdad was illegal too?

Im glad youre feeling good, your hypocrisy is tantamount to your stupidity

so you admit the 24 hour Shock and Awe attack on Baghdad was illegal too?

Im glad youre feeling good, your hypocrisy is tantamount to your stupidity Originally Posted by CJ7

Deflection is your response CBJ7. Certainly you could do better than that! NOT!

Deflection is your response CBJ7. Certainly you could do better than that! NOT! Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

deflection my ass ... tell everyone how bombing the shit out of civilians with planes flown by trained pilots for 24 hours is any different than killing civilians with drones ...

Why do you keep trying to deflect, WPF? Every time you try to sound smart, you sound stupider than ever. We are not discussing Reagan and Bush, and their war crimes at this time.

If Reagan and Bush got away with war crimes, it does not follow that Obama should get away with his. That's like saying "Since we didn't catch the last two bank robbers, we need to let this third one go." Idiot. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yes it actually does follow that you should not selectively enforce such a grave matter. We have only one president at a time, if you do not want to go back a have a trial for Buch then fuck you in your political ass with JD's lil dick.

I've already said numerous times that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld should stand trial for war crimes, WPF. You need to pay attention.

So by all means let us watch this with baited breath or in JD's case with cock and ball breath Originally Posted by WTF

That would be "bated" breath.

Although in the case of your breath, I'm sure 'bait" is an accurate term...

deflection my ass ... tell everyone how bombing the shit out of civilians with planes flown by trained pilots for 24 hours is any different than killing civilians with drones ... Originally Posted by CJ7

I guess I have to spell it out for you CBJ7. Personally, I have no problem with the expanded drone program. What I can not understand is how you libtards are ok with this but chastise the Bush administration for the enhanced interrogation procedures. Like I asked you earlier, which is worse? Outright killing of these terrorists and the innocent civilians who are unfortunate enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time or capturing them and interrogating them for intelligence which might prevent future attacks. Funny, how you never answered that question and how you see no hypocrisy in that.

and my opinion ... fuck Obie for giving W a free pass Originally Posted by CJ7

Perhaps he didn't want to set a precedent?

Maybe he figures HE might need a free pass from the next president?