Blasphemy

i'd do her but only in gangbang style... Originally Posted by Cheaper2buyit

Ok, how could I argue with that Cheaper? I'd also do Palin in a gangbang.

I think the dems are afraid of Palin...she has a knack for getting under their skins.

I think some republicans are afraid of her too. I know more than a few people who are absolutely terrified of her. Alot of this has to do with the hit jobs done to her during the campaign that are now viewed as fact (book burner - not true, 'I can see Russi from my house' was Tna Fey, not her, etc.)...some of it is sexism (I have talked to a few women who aren't ready for a woman president???)....

My thoughts...I like her, but I do know she is kind of talking out of both sides of her mouth. The state of Alaska survives off of federal subsidies, probably more so than any other state, which is not quite her platform. She resigned right before her state had to make decisions about begging for stimulus money...which would have been uncomfortable for her.

I don't think she'll run. I think she doesn't have the stomach to do what a national politician has to do: beg for money from everyone you talk to, parse your words constantly to please different special interest groups, put up with hit job stories (remember the one that her infant son was really her daughter's), true stories about uncomfortable situations - her daughters baby, etc. etc. She is now enjoying fame and fortune...and its probably not that tough a gig. Why would she quit that.

She does currently have the ability to be a king maker, though. If she choses to endorse a republican in the primary...he wins the nomination.

You know Scorpio the dolt must scare them something silly because they just cant stop bashing her. If she was such a dolt why are they so worried. I mean the VP is a dolt but no one pays attention to him enough to say anything, especially everytime they see him. Originally Posted by dirty dog

It's not fear. We just can't believe the mindless masses can be so easily influenced and blinded by her obvious lack of intellect.

From a strategic standpoint, Sarah Palin won't be the the 2012 GOP nominee. She is too polarizing. The moderates and independents would either vote for Obama or they would stay home on election day. This is no different than if Pelosi was running. She is also too polarizing and has the same effects on the moderates and independents. One is too conservative, the other too liberal.

I do think that Palin's comments that maybe Obama attacking Iran would make him tougher is an election killer. This country is tired of war, and especially unnecessary warfare.

she is about babies & money left her state did a book some shows now a reality show hope its porn like. Look cheaper not a repub or dem just common thoughts if she was blond then i wouldn't think she was dumb. MILF

Give me Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck money and I'll say anything they want me to say. Originally Posted by kcbigpapa

There are whores on this board?!? I'm shocked! Shocked, I say!
Seriously though...you think Bachmann is cute? Ewwww! That's just not right. Have you ever heard her talk? Fingernails. Blackboard.

It's not fear. We just can't believe the mindless masses can be so easily influenced and blinded by her obvious lack of intellect. Originally Posted by Muffrider

I can believe it. See: George W. Bush

For Republicans "The Look" is the most important thing. They like somebody that looks Presidential. Think about Mitt Romney and that nude model guy from Massachusetts. They look like leaders and have good surnames for politics. I'd rather elect somebody brilliant even if their last name is Hitler and they look like a lovechild between Henry Waxman and Barney Frank.

It's not fear. We just can't believe the mindless masses can be so easily influenced and blinded by her obvious lack of intellect. Originally Posted by Muffrider

Sort of like what happened in the November 2008 presidential election?

Regardless of what party you belong to, we have to remember that all of these people are POLITICANS. Every single one of them is doing whatever they can to feather their own nest at the expense of the American people. Even George Washington, during the Second Continental Congress in 1775, acted like a politican - he dressed in his military uniform (and stood 6' 4") while sitting as a member of Congress from Virginia. When John Adams proposed that Washington be appointed as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army (at Washington's suggestion), he was approved because he "looked the part".

Whichever individual the opposing side attacks virgorously through the media or through their own speeches is the person that side fears the most. For Republicans, it's Obama and Pelosi. For Democrats, it's Palin and Limbaugh. By contrast, the individual the opposing side approves of the most or who gets the most positive press is the one that side hopes is their opposition for the upcoming debate/election. For Republicans, I haven't heard of anyone that they approve. For Democrats, it was McCain in 2008.

Actually, LM, the "look" applies to anyone in politics - as I described above with Washington. It applied in 1960 when Nixon won the verbal (radio) debate but Kennedy won the visual (television) debate. In 2008, Obama had the "young, articulate, clean" look (as stated in the Los Angeles Times) as opposed to HRC's 60-year old female look and McCain's 70-year old male look. Romney and Brown may have the "look" as well, and I know Palin has the look. But, the upcoming elections may be ones of actually looking at the issues and how each candidate articulates their views of the issues (one can only hope) instead of how well the candidates look.

This article: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/palin.asp

With this photo:

Originally Posted by BiggestBest

Looks like snopes.com linked to a photo that has been replaced by the green frowning smiley face. Hopefully they will fix that soon.

What's the difference between Palin's mouth and her vagina?

Not everything that comes out of her vagina is retarded....

(its a joke take it as such)

I can believe it. See: George W. Bush

For Republicans "The Look" is the most important thing. They like somebody that looks Presidential. Originally Posted by Longermonger

Regardless of what party you belong to, we have to remember that all of these people are POLITICANS. Every single one of them is doing whatever they can to feather their own nest at the expense of the American people. Even George Washington, during the Second Continental Congress in 1775, acted like a politican - he dressed in his military uniform (and stood 6' 4") while sitting as a member of Congress from Virginia. When John Adams proposed that Washington be appointed as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army (at Washington's suggestion), he was approved because he "looked the part".

Whichever individual the opposing side attacks virgorously through the media or through their own speeches is the person that side fears the most. For Republicans, it's Obama and Pelosi. For Democrats, it's Palin and Limbaugh. By contrast, the individual the opposing side approves of the most or who gets the most positive press is the one that side hopes is their opposition for the upcoming debate/election. For Republicans, I haven't heard of anyone that they approve. For Democrats, it was McCain in 2008.

Actually, LM, the "look" applies to anyone in politics - as I described above with Washington. It applied in 1960 when Nixon won the verbal (radio) debate but Kennedy won the visual (television) debate. In 2008, Obama had the "young, articulate, clean" look (as stated in the Los Angeles Times) as opposed to HRC's 60-year old female look and McCain's 70-year old male look. Romney and Brown may have the "look" as well, and I know Palin has the look. But, the upcoming elections may be ones of actually looking at the issues and how each candidate articulates their views of the issues (one can only hope) instead of how well the candidates look. Originally Posted by fritz3552

I can agree with this. But I also think that it's a natural human quality for each of us to believe that we are the better informed, and that those who vote contrary to our beliefs are ignorant or devoid of sound reasoning, when it is often the case that those others simply have a different value set.

Take health care for example. Most of us would agree that it is a good thing to rein in the skyrocketing cost of care and insurance, but we get so wrapped up in putting each other down for our beliefs about what is the best way to achieve that goal, that we end up denigrating the discussion to emotional responses about "socialist liberals" vs. "heartless conservatives."

We derail the discussion of the true merits of what is the best, most sound, and most practical way of achieving our shared goal. The media doesn't help because it would rather "hot button" the discussion with inflammatory soundbites to sell papers or airtime, or use so-called pundits who are little more than entertainers who merely stir the pot even more, rather than cover a dispassionate intellectual discussion of the merits of one approach over another. And we are complicit by letting the politicians and media bait us into the childish fight in the sandbox.

As long as we fail to reach a common understanding, the politicians, media, and pundits have job security while we continue to suffer, get more frustrated, and fight each other even more.

For the record I am not a big fan of hers, I just find it funny how much she is attacked by the liberal left. This keeps her in the public spot light, without this attention she would probably just fade away.

Palin is a easy target. No doubt about it. But she made the choices she made, and chooses the things she does. From that evidence I'd say she likes the attention even if it is negative. So I don't feel taking a shot at her now and again is any big deal. She brings it on herself. LOL I will say this about how she looks... she's definitely doable. If she doesn't talk. I keep waiting for her to say "He's fleeing the interview!" because she sounds to me like she's channeling the character of the Sheriff from the Movie "Fargo". Michelle Bachman is not a horrible looking woman, but not in the same league looks wise as Palin. Palin at least looks like she could give me a blow job and like doing it, or if not, at least I would like getting it. Bachman says things that just seem batshit crazy to me. I wouldn't put my junk anywhere close to her.