Friends, You have been foolish

I U. Even if you have just come out as G-A-Y Originally Posted by Monsieur

Is anything that simple? Like I could ever be so uncomplicated.

Indeed: I am gay. I fantasize about being Gale to Tyra's Oprah one day, or maybe Daphne Guinness' lingerie. PLEASE make sure the breasts are in bloody proportion-I'm an aesthete and weird proportions are unsettling. (Daniel Craig is a male example of wierd, gross out proportion. Mark Wahlberg has similar shape without the wierdness.)

When I was twelve, I wanted to be both Milla Jovovich and Peter Murphy. Didn't help when those scandalous Cindy and KD photos hit the stands. I don't give a damn who gets me off so long as I have pretty shoes but I'm not particular either way. Love is love and its a blessing regardless. I never meant to give the impression otherwise. To clarify: this is simply to say that I just don't give a damn for American gender crap, and am quite comfortable in my binary. I swing neither way, really: I just like entitled, well-dressed jerks in general.

I think you are adorable too, Cole.

In the interest of full disclosure, the avatar Irena linked to both a blog I authored, and a blogging collective* I belonged to, in the forum some amt of times. Traffic from ASPD did show up in the stats, but only immediately after her/his/its posts; after a few days, the traffic would assume its original pattern. I'm content in having masked my voice much better than most of you realize-and far better than I ever thought I could.

As I told some of you-you know, in those apology notes you disregarded to descend further into your own self-deceiving bitchery?-the weight of that altered voice was killing me and getting smaller and sillier and more ridiculous and I had had enough. It is nice to breathe again.

I'm not going to apologize, because if you still need an apology after all of this you may suck your thumb instead. Any owed have been issued, and if your still bruised, well you'll learn to manage I suppose.

<3
Niv

*Neither my blog nor the collective were specifically related to the sex industry in any way, shape, or form.

Allusion or Delusion or Illusion?

I think I'm going to start an all about me thread as wel l. Right after the no piece of a** thread.

I think I'm going to start an all about me thread as wel l. Right after the no piece of a** thread. Originally Posted by discreetgent

THis ThReaD waS AlL AbouT YoU.

And you and you and you and U2.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb1XXs7e7ac"]YouTube- U2 I Still Haven't Found What Im Looking For Live From Milan[/ame]



She makes a very good point boys and girls. Uncle Sam no longer cares which tubbie is you! When will the rest of us?

Fascinating this thread was now started by Guest020510

THis ThReaD waS AlL AbouT YoU.
Originally Posted by WTF

I've been trying to sell this for a while:

....cause I'd have to hit "Pause" & "Rewind" a couple of times to figure out what the hell just happened...

Oh well...don't guess it really matters. The smart money is on more back-channel territorial BS anyway.

Fare thee well madam/sir/resident!!!

I may not understand a single word that you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to confuse me!!!

I've been trying to sell this for a while:
Originally Posted by discreetgent

It would be eaiser to sell if you quoted me in proper context. You left out an importan element.

:

And you and you and you and U2.

: Originally Posted by WTF

The thread was no more about the thread starter than "In The Ghetto" is about poor children and not an indictment on society. Of course I do realize that two perfectly sane people can view the exact same thing and describe totally different views.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWg2vLEyRZc"]YouTube- Lisa Marie & Elvis Presley - In The Ghetto[/ame]

Fascinating this thread was now started by Guest020510 Originally Posted by discreetgent

How so?

[quote=discreetgent;93401]Fascinating this thread was now started by Guest020510

How so? Originally Posted by WTF

Just that it is not the norm for a thread to be started by one username and have that username change with it still in progress.

[quote=discreetgent;93873]

Fascinating this thread was now started by Guest020510

Just that it is not the norm for a thread to be started by one username and have that username change with it still in progress. Originally Posted by discreetgent

Well it has happened twice in the past week....maybe guesting accounts in the middle of threads in the new standard!

[quote=WTF;93891]

Well it has happened twice in the past week....maybe guesting accounts in the middle of threads in the new standard!




Originally Posted by discreetgent

i think it might be camille and somehow she dis-joined or de-joined or maybe it was she quit...and now her nic reverted to guest

Yes, the other one was Camille; easy to figure out by reading the thread and some responses. You twice in a week ..... but still rather unusual.

Gee, I wonder if there was a common thread between both ladies leaving?

Maybe there was something in those drinks they talked about sharing.

Maybe there was something in those drinks they talked about sharing. Originally Posted by Nicolette Bordeauxva

Maybe they went off to share those drinks. Where did I put that "fly on the wall" application....

Maybe there was something in those drinks they talked about sharing. Originally Posted by Nicolette Bordeauxva

Maybe it was shots of sanity and honesty