All I got say is fuck me running. Not real sure how/why you put me in the military but
HooYah.
Do NOT agree here! Sure it can be, but not necessarily by its nature. Actually I find it very honest and to the point most of the time.I would agree with the honorable gentleman deservedly above my humble posting. It is an illegal trade not necessarily a dishonest trade.. With experienced, reputable ladies on this board I have not once been cheated or misled, and there are a few I have trusted with financial transactions involving hundreds of dollars. I would not get undressed with a person I thought might steal my clothes. In life, it has been my experience that we tend to choose companions that are about as honest as we are.
Originally Posted by MoonHowler
Do NOT agree here! Sure it can be, but not necessarily by its nature. Actually I find it very honest and to the point most of the time.
Originally Posted by MoonHowler
I would agree with the honorable gentleman deservedly above my humble posting. It is an illegal trade not necessarily a dishonest trade.. With experienced, reputable ladies on this board I have not once been cheated or misled, and there are a few I have trusted with financial transactions involving hundreds of dollars. I would not get undressed with a person I thought might steal my clothes. In life, it has been my experience that we tend to choose companions that are about as honest as we are. Originally Posted by Mr.ChanThank you VERY much gentlemen!!!!!!! There are MANY of us who are VERY honest!!
Makes me not a tinkers damn.... Certainly sounds like you give a "tinkers damn". Obvious observation. Originally Posted by diveguy6
I agree Moon, but the place I found this info is a freebie...I was pretty stunned Stunned? Did it really STUN you? at what I saw there, that I was laboring LABORING? You've been laboring with the effort of keeping your reviews/ML comments private, have you?? under the impression that only us dawgs were privy to this info... Originally Posted by diveguy6
What I'm saying is providers say they can't see the ROS, but they can. You're kidding!! Those lying wenches!! Some have said they weren't supposed to be able to. I have never sent a provider a copy to proof read. I just tell the truth. Well, give you a cookie. Sending it to her seems like an opportunity to gloss it over if she doesn't like it. Again, I am back to Moon's opinion, adding this thought...Makes you wonder if this is adding to drama and bullshit that raises it head all too often... How would it cause drama or bullshit? If Pamela Provider reads every review ever written then who really cares? Does anyone else even have time to think about this?! Originally Posted by diveguy6
+100 Jim...that's exactly the point I've been trying to get across, but the site I'm talking about helps one hell of a lot. Like I said, a provider told me about this site, and damn if it don't exist...I feel we're damed if we do, damned if we don't... Damned now, are you? Am I the only one who sees this as petty and overdramatic? Originally Posted by diveguy6I'll apologize in advance if my flippancy offends anyone but honestly, who really cares? Is it that big of a deal? All this assuming the hooker even CARES what is written in ROS. I mean, we see the physical description. We see if the review is positive or negative. What more do we need to see?
I'll clarify a bit.... Yes, this is illegal and dishonesty is rampant in illegal activities but not all of those involved are completely how generous dishonest.
However, not all information is completely shared like real ages, recent pics, and I'm certain everyone on this board tells their real life friends what they do for a living or where they were for the past couple of hours. Sharing only partial truths is not being completely honest is it? Relevance? Oh wait, are you still defending yourself for insinuating that providing is a dishonest career path? Carry on...
I'm certain that the third guy in line for the day wasn't told the two before him just a few hours before enjoyed CIM before he enjoys a DFK. Sweet of you to speak in hypotheticals and not direct your comments at anyone specific. However, underneath your generalizations and hypothetical situations there is disdain and contempt. No need to sugarcoat it, lover. Just be yourself. Originally Posted by jim1995