Doove does not exist when you put him on ignore. LOL. I don't either. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDBI just like to see how DUMB some people can be
But, if you make 250,000 and taxes take 50% leaving you with 125,000 are you still wealthy? Originally Posted by JdrillerYou're still in the top 2%.
I just like to see how DUMB some people can be Originally Posted by cptjohnstoneTalk about dumb. We can't even agree on what "the top 2%" means.
You're still in the top 2%.
Talk about dumb. We can't even agree on what "the top 2%" means.
This country is doomed. Originally Posted by Doove
The truth is like always, somewhere in between. Originally Posted by waverunner234In the economic environment of the past couple of years, if someone has a job that pays their bills current, reduces some of their debt each month, provides health insurance coverage for "all in the family," and gives a little extra into savings each month for "a rainy day" ... they are way ahead "of the game."
You sure like to throw that word around alot. My sentence started with "Maybe". I guess anyone can check that "are you over 18" box and post on here.are the stats indexed to inflation?
If you read my earlier post I said that being rich depends on where you live. I know nothing about the level prosperity in Buffalo. I have observed however that the folks from Buffalo are tight, like to hang out together, drink beer and they love their Bills...Oh,,and OJ is innocent. I do know a little more about San Antonio. That's why I said "maybe"....Dooooooove.
If one lived in a more affluent neighborhood such as NYC then 250k a year might be looked at as middle to lower middle class.
If one lived in Arkansas and if you own your own double wide you might be considered rich.
It all depends on your prospective. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
Just curious as to what most would percieve as a fair tax rate overallhis idea is interesting, but um bleah......
What percent of Americans should pay INCOME TAX?
How do you define wealthy? It if you make 200,000, 250,000, 500,000 or 1 million dollars or more in net income per year?
What is the maximim percent that would be fair to pay in INCOME TAX COMBINED WITH SELF EMPLOYMENT OR PAYROLL TAXES AND SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES. Is it 30%, 40%, 50% or more?
Currently the "official" definition of wealthy seems to be 250,000 per year in net income. I personally don't think that makes you wealthy, maybe well off, maybe upper middle income but not wealthy.
I feel that no matter what you make per year, paying more than 50% of your income (income tax + self employment taxes/SS taxes) is about as high as it should go.
What do you think of Cains 9-9-9 tax proposal (that is 9% income tax, 9% national sales tax, 9% corparate/business tax)? He claims that combination would raise as much mony or more than the current tax system. Pretty much all loop holes would be eliminated under his plan. Originally Posted by Jdriller