Bellabonita inappropriate texts

  • Jkynx
  • 04-13-2016, 05:05 PM
Lmao!
canihitit's Avatar
So what in the fuck is this? An alert? Maybe a coed discussion?

It's damn sure not a review.
lesbianbob's Avatar
Hobby phone, verified provider, you were obviously more cautious than you should have been.
A well reviewed provider, vs. A newbie, you are fighting a losing battle.
I would suggest you let this thread die and come back later with a real review.
  • cr76
  • 04-13-2016, 07:02 PM
Damn - I fell like an adrenaline junkie now

My txt; 250?? Are you GFE ?? DFK, DATY, BBBJ, CIM??
Too bad 4 u... Bella has some remarkable skill u won't get to enjoy now.

Good Hunting.
Pistolero's Avatar
moved to coed from review forum
Imo, the overt text from her was unprofessional, however, from your own accounting, you brought up $$ via text, which is also a no no, so, your bad. Add that with your knowing she is a know provider, you could have at least arrived to feel the situation.

Botton line. Your fault. Own up. Apologize. Move on.
albundy's Avatar
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Holy Shit!!! Oh this guy is too much.

What in the fuck was the OP afraid of?!? She's not some random Backpage hooker that has no "intel" or reviews. You KNOW she's a hooker and the real deal. It's fine. Geez.

(Reminds me of those guys that feel the need to put "this story is a figment of my imagination" on their reviews. Or guys that put freakin' codes for the price they paid to fuck. ARGHHH!!! That shit is unnecessary. How in the FUCK would a cop or anyone PROVE that you paid that much and that incident ever ACTUALLY took place just going by what you wrote on an "anonymous" review. NO way to PROVE you even wrote it or that sex for money really occurred. Would take too much time and money for nothing. Relax.)
Richiej281's Avatar
Damn OP, even though I didn't see the messages, all I can say is: sucks to suck.
most seasoned ladies won't discuss sex... as for him being a low baller, she put the ad out there, that means she is lowering her price... but if the price for _____is not what he is looking for he has the right to move on.

sounds like she needs $$$ and is ticked off that someone passed up on a quickie
tbone77494's Avatar
Imagine if he texted Dorthy.
bellabonita's Avatar
First yes I do post on backpage he never mentioned eccie not one time he did this because he figured he could get a cheaper price which he did because everything I do in backpage is covered I like to know what exactly my client is looking for so there's no confusion on our session my goal is for my client to be pleased as well as myself
JohnnyYanks's Avatar
... my goal is for my client to be pleased as well as myself Originally Posted by bellabonita
Spoken like a true professional.

But, for your safety, you might should stop texting "sex" and prices to strangers and dipshits. ijs.
So I should have just not been so careful...? Y'all are just wasting my time with no worthy comments Originally Posted by Larson1251

I can understand why mention of specific activities would make one nervous, even if he knows she is a well-known/reputable provider.

Even if I have screened a gent up and down, I feel the first meeting is always a bit tentative as you get to know one another and suss each other out. I feel that explicit conversations of money and/or sex should not occur until both know that each other are 100% safe.

My advice to you, to avoid anything like this from happening in the future: negotiate your session in advance. I have had gents ask me specifics or request something in particular. I wait until I screen them to answer any types of questions such as this, and even once I do, I am careful with my words.

However, if you negotiate your session in full prior to arrival time (activities, rates, etc), then there should be no reason for either party to need to discuss this once the session is taking place.
bellabonita's Avatar
Spoken like a true professional.

But, for your safety, you might should stop texting "sex" and prices to strangers and dipshits. ijs. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks
Lmao this is true I'm going to have to change the way I deal with backpage clients I suppose