It seems our left leaning “Biden Buddies” will defend a Democrat to any length.
“Blame the messenger” seems to be in play.
It seems our left leaning “Biden Buddies” will defend a Democrat to any length.Jackie you're a Trump guy, you defended Adams. You posted that he was using deductive reasoning. If you swim across the "Rio Grande" river to get across the border you must be able to swim well. There are guys on here who think that someone who looks like Adams can't use deductive reasoning, they don't have enough synapses in the brain.
“Blame the messenger” seems to be in play. Originally Posted by Jackie S
According to the Mayor of NYC, they are here illegally and are great swimmers. That's pretty much all he said at the time. To me, that sounds extremely racist and stereotyping and a few other things. But ya know, NYC voted for it, so I guess the whole of NYC is racist by your measure. So your saying it is, pretty much confirms that he is. But in my book, I think he's just a moron who doesn't know any better and does't have the sense to give a hoot. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
And what does that make someone who starts a thread about it? Originally Posted by txdot-guyThe racist. Duh.
It seems our left leaning “Biden Buddies” will defend a Democrat to any length.
“Blame the messenger” seems to be in play. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Jackie you're a Trump guy, you defended Adams. You posted that he was using deductive reasoning. If you swim across the "Rio Grande" river to get across the border you must be able to swim well. There are guys on here who think that someone who looks like Adams can't use deductive reasoning, they don't have enough synapses in the brain. Originally Posted by adav8s28Neither the OP nor even Mayor Adams said nutt'n about the Rio Grande river or even the Southern boarder. I'll give you best out of three guesses who said "Rio Grande" first. Yet some one of those three guesses deduced that Mayor Adams' Sherlock Holmes like reasoning concluded as such.
Neither the OP nor even Mayor Adams said nutt'n about the Rio Grande river or even the Southern boarder. I'll give you best out of three guesses who said "Rio Grande" first. Yet some one of those three guesses deduced that Mayor Adams' Sherlock Holmes like reasoning concluded as such.I would be willing to say that taken as it is without any other context it’s just a little bit racist. However the Mayor is not wrong. Putting these people to work is better than leaving them to live off the dole. Given the aging of our population and the need for more workers leaving a large labor force out of the economy doesn’t seem to be the brightest idea.
Well... It's possibly not racist, but it danged sure ain't brilliant either. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
I would be willing to say that taken as it is without any other context it’s just a little bit racist. However the Mayor is not wrong. Putting these people to work is better than leaving them to live off the dole. Given the aging of our population and the need for more workers leaving a large labor force out of the economy doesn’t seem to be the brightest idea. Originally Posted by txdot-guyThat sounds a lot like The Roman Empire somewhere around 500 AD.
I'm with Tiny. There is no way to know who "they" are that are not given the right to work. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500Eccieuser, What some of our fellow board members fail to appreciate is what the effect on the U.S. economy would be of depriving all illegal immigrants of jobs. They're 5% of the labor force. Given we're at full employment, we'd have labor shortages. Things wouldn't get done. There would be upward pressure on prices, especially if combined with the higher tariffs that Trump's proposing to impose.
Eccieuser, What some of our fellow board members fail to appreciate is what the effect on the U.S. economy would be of depriving all illegal immigrants of jobs. They're 5% of the labor force. Given we're at full employment, we'd have labor shortages. Things wouldn't get done. There would be upward pressure on prices, especially if combined with the higher tariffs that Trump's proposing to impose.
I would strongly prefer a guest worker program to what we have now. Make legals out of illegals, without bestowing citizenship on them. Give people from Cuba and Venezuela long term visas, and hopefully in 10 years or so their countries won't be so fucked up. My belief from extensive conversations with Cuban strippers is that they'd just as soon or rather live in Havana as the U.S., if they had money, and if Cuba weren't currently undergoing extreme economic hardship. I imagine many would like to make money in the USA and retire back to their countries.
Guest worker programs have worked out well for places like the United Arab Emirates and Singapore. It's been a win-win for those countries and the Indians and others that work there. It would work here too.
And it's not just the economy. What would Un Dia sin Mexicanos be like? Well, there's a movie about that and it's not pretty. It's kind of like War of the Worlds, only it doesn't have a happy ending:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYJcfhxMkrQ Originally Posted by Tiny