DOJ Knew Russian Dossier Unverified, Said Nothing For Years

Haha... let him speak, I kinda like his handle "Very Skeptical", we'll see if he lives up to it, he certainly doesn't approach the Steele dossier with skepticism... we'll see, he might be that rarest of species - a liberal who can actually put forth a coherent argument, wouldn't that be fun?

The libs in this forum are weak & frail ponies - no match for us war horses! Speaking of war horses, has anyone seen IB? Originally Posted by lustylad

I gave him the benefit of the doubt. But I was skeptical that he would prove me wrong. He didn’t. So I call him Mr I’m not very skeptical. The Political Forum version of Tolstoy. A lot of wasted bandwidth.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt. But I was skeptical that he would prove me wrong. He didn’t. So I call him Mr I’m not very skeptical. The Political Forum version of Tolstoy. A lot of wasted bandwidth. Originally Posted by bambino

explain your reference to Tolstoy if you will

probably one of the greatest authors ever, maybe in the top 1

is it that you mean he has a good imagination, he makes things up?

did WAPO reporters receive Pulitzers while getting the Russia/trump story completely wrong? or was it just reporters from the nyt?

oh yeah, both did, forget they were 100% wrong, because hey, they are elite and professional, unlike all those red neck goobers who happened to have been right all along, plus they are on "our" side

quoting WAPO stories will certainly be convincing Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

And the NYT and WaPo were being fed false/unverified info illegally from inside the White House by Dim/NeverTrumper plants. One of the NYT reporters was actually fucking her source for information.

And the NYT and WaPo were being fed false/unverified info illegally from inside the White House by Dim/NeverTrumper plants. One of the NYT reporters was actually fucking her source for information. Originally Posted by gnadfly

well we await the promised wapo "proof"

and I wonder what it proves thats of any consequence anyway even if it proves something

And the NYT and WaPo were being fed false/unverified info illegally from inside the White House by Dim/NeverTrumper plants. One of the NYT reporters was actually fucking her source for information. Originally Posted by gnadfly

What's her byline? Is she still working at the Times? "All the news that's fit to spread your legs for" lol.

I'm sure she learned that trick in journalism school while fucking her professors for an "A". It's called journalistic "ethics" - you gotta do what you gotta do, right?

explain your reference to Tolstoy if you will

probably one of the greatest authors ever... Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Bam is referring to a poster in the Pittsburgh forums who is long-winded and turgid and has nothing in common with the acclaimed Russian author whose name he appropriated for his eccie handle.

What's her byline? Is she still working at the Times? "All the news that's fit to spread your legs for" lol.

I'm sure she learned that trick in journalism school while fucking her professors for an "A". It's called journalistic "ethics" - you gotta do what you gotta do, right? Originally Posted by lustylad

https://www.thewrap.com/new-york-tim...onship-source/

The New York Times has reassigned reporter Ali Watkins after news emerged last month that she had a sexual relationship with a source while she was at her previous employer BuzzFeed.

“We are troubled by Ali’s conduct, particularly while she was employed by other news organizations,” said Times executive editor Dean Baquet in an internal memo on Tuesday. “For a reporter to have an intimate relationship with someone he or she covers is unacceptable. It violates our written standards and the norms of journalism.”

“After careful examination and discussion, I have decided to reassign her to a position in New York for a fresh start, where she will be closely supervised and have a senior mentor,” he added along with a promise to put in new internal safeguards to ensure similar situations do not arise in the future.


The decision caps a lengthy Times review of Watkins’ behavior with Senate Intelligence committee aide James Wolfe. Wolfe was arrested for lying to the FBI in a leak investigation and his private relationship with Watkins came to light after Watkins’ emails and private correspondence with him were seized by the feds.

Where’s Durham? Originally Posted by bambino

Hopefully he's trimming that stupid walrus looking mustache. Just by the way he wears his facial hair is a tell tale sign he's a fucking idiot and a Liberal at heart.

https://www.thewrap.com/new-york-tim...onship-source/

The New York Times has reassigned reporter Ali Watkins after news emerged last month that she had a sexual relationship with a source while she was at her previous employer BuzzFeed.

“We are troubled by Ali’s conduct, particularly while she was employed by other news organizations,” said Times executive editor Dean Baquet in an internal memo on Tuesday. “For a reporter to have an intimate relationship with someone he or she covers is unacceptable. It violates our written standards and the norms of journalism.”

“After careful examination and discussion, I have decided to reassign her to a position in New York for a fresh start, where she will be closely supervised and have a senior mentor,” he added along with a promise to put in new internal safeguards to ensure similar situations do not arise in the future.

The decision caps a lengthy Times review of Watkins’ behavior with Senate Intelligence committee aide James Wolfe. Wolfe was arrested for lying to the FBI in a leak investigation and his private relationship with Watkins came to light after Watkins’ emails and private correspondence with him were seized by the feds. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Closely supervised by a "senior mentor"?

Hmmm... I wonder if Bill Clinton is looking for an intern?

Closely supervised by a "senior mentor"?

Hmmm... I wonder if Bill Clinton is looking for an intern?


Originally Posted by lustylad

as between those two, its a toss up as to who f'd above their natural level

the real excitement does come when you think you are f-ing above your own level but then you tend to become foolish and do things like leak and lie

looks like you guys are missing wtf already.


he'd be on this thread.. "nothing to see here" riff. lol. I see other libs aren't defending what the fbi did.

looks like you guys are missing wtf already.


he'd be on this thread.. "nothing to see here" riff. lol. I see other libs aren't defending what the fbi did. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Did he get banned again?

It was always a matter of when, not if. Let's see what new handles appear in this forum.

Did he get banned again? Originally Posted by Levianon17

lol... YES!!!

lol... YES!!! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

How long was he back from his last Ban 4 or 5 months?