It says more stupidity, you shouldn't brag about that hillbilly. Originally Posted by i'va biggensend your report card to JCM and I will do the same, your a coward
I find it hysterical that some of the loudest supporters of Davis "following her conscious and to hell with the law or anyone else's rights", would be completely against followers of a certain other religion becoming martyrs because "their conscious calls them to be warriors in a holy war".perfectly stated.
Too many on here, starting with King Tongue, mouth what their RWW hatemongers tell them to say. And believe certain religions can be used as justification for interfering with laws, but other religions cannot be. Contrary to the Thumpers on here, the US is not a evangelical Christian theocracy. Originally Posted by Old-T
Davis is wrong and should have followed the law. That being said this administration doesn't enforce laws they disagree with. What is the difference? Originally Posted by BudmanThere is a significant "difference" between "Davis" and "this administration."
I'm not a frequent reader of evangelical Christian authors, but this guy makes pretty good sense from a WWJD standpoint... And by doing so takes the heavenly wind out of your hypocritical sails, you drunk-on-seamen.
The Kentucky slunt currently rots in jail to protect OUR freedom.
This preacher man is pissed about it.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/revange...s-liberty.html
Feel free to defend the Kentucky slunt in the context of this argument. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
There is a significant "difference" between "Davis" and "this administration."That just about nails it.
"Davis" does not have the authority to issue an Executive Order.
This (and every) "administration" does have that authority.
Case closed!
However, "Davis" did have the right to quit her job with no repercussions.
That's what she should have done!
Instead, she chose to ignore the court order and they put her stupid ass in jail!
Good for them! Originally Posted by bigtex
There is a significant "difference" between "Davis" and "this administration."
"Davis" does not have the authority to issue an Executive Order.
This (and every) "administration" does have that authority.
Case closed!
However, "Davis" did have the right to quit her job with no repercussions.
That's what she should have done!
Instead, she chose to ignore the court order and they put her stupid ass in jail!
Good for them! Originally Posted by bigtex