Because we do not want the bulk of Europe dependent on Russian energy is the short answer. Originally Posted by WTFMaybe they should’ve listened to Trump when he dressed them down for becoming exactly that.
The only one that benefits from WWIII is nobody. Besides, it would actually be WWIIA and WWIIIB. A with Russia and B with China. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Well, it might not be so bad. Considering their nukes are older than what they are using, 6-8/10 might not make it out of launch initialization. Russia just might nuke Russia out of existence. The remaining ones would probably land in the ocean far from target. Originally Posted by 69in2it69Or if the US gets really lucky... it'll hit DC while Congress is in joint session!
Well, it might not be so bad. Considering their nukes are older than what they are using, 6-8/10 might not make it out of launch initialization. Russia just might nuke Russia out of existence. The remaining ones would probably land in the ocean far from target. Originally Posted by 69in2it69Close enough is good enough in horseshoes, hand grenades and nukes.
The only one that benefits from WWIII is nobody. Besides, it would actually be WWIIA and WWIIIB. A with Russia and B with China. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_DoThe theory is that a war would bring the American people together behind the president. The bigger the war, the better. On top of that it would create a crisis and who are the biggest crisis mongers in the land? You know, the democrat party.
The theory is that a war would bring the American people together behind the president. The bigger the war, the better. On top of that it would create a crisis and who are the biggest crisis mongers in the land? You know, the democrat party. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn