We all know COL is an average and yes, Vegas is on the lower side. Though your example assumes providers live within that average.
Now being that providers, for example purposes, are self-employed/independent contractors, there are costs of doing business that are not absorbed by an employer.
LV is one of the most expensive markets for advertising, you have photoshoots, website design and/or hosting, perhaps even a webmaster to do site updates. Internet & phone service, memberships for review boards and screening sites. Hair, nails, gym, tanning. Lingerie, condoms/lube, toys, std screenings. Health insurance, child care, car insurance, gas (especially if she's driving all over the planet seeing locals), incalls. And lets not forget paying taxes, whether its monthly, quarterly or yearly. CPA, attorney on retainer etc, etc.
All of those costs are not adjusted for COL, they have been going up or staying the same, but not going down.
Anyway, while I understand the generalities of your statement, in reality it's just not viable. *But* if you really believe in your words, go ask your boss (if you have one) for a cost of living adjustment to your salary and commissions because Vegas has one of the lowest costs of living and you don't want them paying you too much. Or hell, if you're the boss, definitely give yourself a paycut.
Oh and to add to the DFW vs. LV discussion, do some research here and you'll easily find quite a few Vegas providers who tour other areas including DFW. It amazes me how their rates all of a sudden drops (sometimes by as much as $/hr), the minute they're outside of Vegas. Cost of living is considerably lower here than many other major metropolitan areas of the country... Originally Posted by ToBeOrNotToBe