Photographer admits to doctoring photos of Trump inauguration to make the crowd appear larger

In 1992 I was living in Jacksonville, FL. I was working downtown near Jax Landing when George H W Bush came to town. The secret service asked us some questions because we were working so close and outside. I worked as an electrician then. Anyway we witnessed thousands of people in the streets for three blocks around. Estimates put the crowd between 70,000 to 100,000. However that night on the local news which sponsored a Clinton event reported a "sparse" crowd and the video only showed the crowd near the stage. What we call fake news now and propaganda then. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

there have been instances where the fake news tried to indicate the crowds at trump rallies were
virtually non-existent

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Ouch that has to sting a whole lot

Ouch that has to sting a whole lot Originally Posted by Stockinglover

She has found that a bottle of wine thrown at a TV tends to take away part of the sting...momentarily !

This comes as a tremendous shock.

Most American voters chose not to take the nation to Crazytown

It’s a shame that this is one of the most trivial failures of character displayed by the corrupt, petty Trump regime. But it was an eerie warning of what lunacy was surely to follow.

Winning?


Photographer admits editing inauguration photos - CNN Politicshttps://apple.news/AD0sSn7kASs6wDNYx1LgEiw Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Who was the photographer that made the Clinton rallies look small, or were they actually that small?


Jim

I wonder how republican presidential inaugurations in general stack up to dimocrat inaugurations in terms of crowd size for maybe the last 50 years or so

I'd think that crowds for dimocrats would be generally larger

politics, to dimocrats, is a religion and it would seem the fervor would be correspondent

comparing any recent inaugurations to Obama's, the first one especially, I'd think would be unfair as he was a special case, first black, seen as a savior, would heal the seas, etc etc and all the crying and adoration and hope invested in him by all the lost souls would make a normal inauguration seem pale in ardor by comparison

when I read the thread title, I thought it meant adding crowds into the far reaches of the mall, but no, the article means just limiting the print view Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

D.C. is 95% domestic dim-retards. Therefore, any dim-retard inauguration has a home field advantage.

What Aboutism.

She didn’t lie about it, over and over and over.

But like I said, this stupidity was only a precursor of the “shit got real” stupidity that has continued on a daily basis since the biggest inauguration crowd ever was pulled out of Sean Spicer’s ass. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

yssup starts a thread about Trump inauguration in 2017 then makes his famous quote when shown a picture of Hillary's inauguration which we all know didn't happen What Aboutism

Again, what does that have to do with the utter fraud perpetrated on by Trump on his own Inauguration Day?

Lol Trump is nuttier than Squirril turd Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Found a lot of nuts digging in squirrel "not squirril"turds??

Again, what does that have to do with the utter fraud perpetrated on by Trump on his own Inauguration Day? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The democrats in Washington have been perpetrating a fraud on America for over a hundred years!!

The democrats in Washington have been perpetrating a fraud on America for over a hundred years!! Originally Posted by bb1961

What Aboutism, bb1961, and a feeble attempt at that.

This thread is about Trump’s false claims about his poorly supported inauguration, and the subsequent tirade that ensured on his very first day in office. Proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Confirmed by the photographer who was ordered to doctor the photos.

Your response is above.

Swing and miss, sir.

LOL! Lots of comments though. Apparently nobody read the story.

Here’s one of a plethora of links to this bit of Trump lunacy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rt/1238838002/ Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Please read the subsequent link. Sorry for the broken first one.

And then let us know how you feel about the President’s paranoid first day on the job. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Again, what does that have to do with the utter fraud perpetrated on by Trump on his own Inauguration Day? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

More what aboutism from yssup so here is some for you yssup

Found a lot of nuts digging in squirrel "not squirril"turds?? Originally Posted by bb1961

Be careful. Some may believe that an inability to spell English words is a derogatory racial remark directed at a specific person.

As opposed to the recognition of our failed public school system and why Obaminable had to be affirmatively assisted in entering Harvard Law School while at the same time refusing to disclose his LSAT, application, and/or transcripts of his grades. Like his original birth certificate: Missing DOCUMENTS! But they want a Judge's!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!

Great job, Hotrod. Eventually you’ll figure it out.

BTW — those words flat out scared the shit out of the insurance companies. And that’s why they fought so hard to scuttle it. But of course, that, along with your unsurprising default to What Aboutism is completely irrelevant to this thread.

What’s your explanation for the revelation in the OP? What About the topic of the thread?

The OP was about how Trump lied in your words, about his inauguration picture and a photographer that altered the picture to make it look like their were more people who attended it, this hardly affected the people of America other than you, as much as Obama's lies did with his healthcare bill did

That’s not true. Re-read the OP.