Swing States in 2012 Presidential Election

You are sadly mistaken, Yssup, if you for one moment believe Odumbo is going to sway any of those massed against him to vote for him because of a debate. His actions over the last three plus years speak louder than any words he might say on a stage. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This thread is about swing states. This excludes "those massed against him" and is for the undecided voters.

This thread is about swing states. This excludes "those massed against him" and is for the undecided voters. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Once again that is your opinion, and it remains no more valid than anyone else's opinion.

Once again that is your opinion, and it remains no more valid than anyone else's opinion. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Not opinion, fact.

The thread name is Swing States in 2012 Presidential Election

Once again you are wrong.

PS Go ahead and argue this. I can't wait to hear what kind of shit you come up with.

Once again that is your opinion, and it remains no more valid than anyone else's opinion. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ric...y-favors-obama

Not opinion, fact.

The thread name is Swing States in 2012 Presidential Election

Once again you are wrong.

PS Go ahead and argue this. I can't wait to hear what kind of shit you come up with. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Guess it was your ignorance you were showing, not your opinion. You have an innate inability to conceptualize a post in proper context. Yssup commented on the fucking debates -- not Swing States, or did you did you fail to comprehend that fact?

Guess it was your ignorance you were showing, not your opinion. You have an innate inability to conceptualize a post in proper context. And you do? I commented on the thread. You wanted to bitch so you ignored my context. I don't have to respond to every comment.Yssup commented on the fucking debates -- not Swing States, or did you did you fail to comprehend that fact? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Say it. You were wrong.

Squirm little worm. Keep wiggling and wrapping around the hook.

I can read, can you?

This thread is about swing states. This excludes "those massed against him" and is for the undecided voters.


It's simple. I said the thread was about swing states. The word "thread" sets the context my statement was made in.
You said it was my opinion that the thread was about swing states.
You were wrong. It is a fact.

Say it. You were wrong.

Squirm little worm. Keep wiggling and wrapping around the hook.

I can read, can you?

This thread is about swing states. This excludes "those massed against him" and is for the undecided voters.


It's simple. I said the thread was about swing states. The word "thread" sets the context my statement was made in.
You said it was my opinion that the thread was about swing states.
You were wrong. It is a fact. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Squirm, squirm, squirm as you seek to hide the fact that you ignorantly didn't comprehend Yssup's comment on the upcoming debates -- and not on swing states. Squirm, squirm, squirm!

Squirm, squirm, squirm as you seek to hide the fact that you ignorantly didn't comprehend Yssup's comment on the upcoming debates -- and not on swing states. Squirm, squirm, squirm! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The word "debate" tipped me off what his post was about.

Moot point since I wasn't addressing his comment

And as you desperately try to change the subject, grabbing at any straw, it's too late. Your're on the bottom..

Everyone has seen you do this many times before.

You will repeat the lie, over and over and over, blaming everyone but yourself.

The word "debate" tipped me off what his post was about. Clever you! But then you ignored it and went off on an inane, not-so-clever tangent. Shame, shame.

Moot point since I wasn't addressing his comment Imagine that! I was addressing his comment. So now you've just admitted your remarks were completely misdirected and inane.

And as you desperately try to change the subject, grabbing at any straw, it's too late. Your're on the bottom.. Not at all, you've admitted your argument has been misdirected and inane.

Everyone has seen you do this many times before. You're suffering from toxic Kool-Aid absorption, and you are having hallucinations.

You will repeat the lie, over and over and over, blaming everyone but yourself. Some more of your pretentious hypocrisy? How quaint.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

.

Okay, that is more like it.

Maybe you could show the old geezer how to post something of substance, but what can you teach a dummy?

DEM GOP
NV AZ
MI NC
NH

Battleground States
1 CO
2 MO
3 WI
4 FL
5 VA
6 OH
7 IA

Based on the latest polls, I would say that President Obama takes New Mexico and Connecticut.

Florida will be an important win, but it could go either way based on the latest figures with Romney 2 points ahead.

Ohio is in a dead heat with 45% for either candidate. That will be real battle state.

According to Rasmussen:
NV, MI, NH -- leaning dem
AZ - solid rep
NC - leaning rep
that leaves CO, MO, WI, FL, VA, OH, IA

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ.../election_2012 Originally Posted by chefnerd

. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Good comebacks!

All that time to say nothing but "I got caught but I'll pretend I didn't".

What ever you say douche-bag, whatever you say.

You should change your bag more often.

The Latino vote will be an important variable in this election.

If the Democrats can clearly show the voters just radical Arizona's policies are then President Obama should pick up those 11 electoral votes, but I really don't understand why he's polling 13 points behind Romney in that state.

Does that state really have it in for immigrants that badly?

I think the most important two states will be Florida and Ohio.

No Republican has ever won the election without winning Ohio, so look for major fireworks in Ohio between now and November!

. . . President Obama has a razor thin lead in Ohio, but he's going to have to protect it with personal visits and really connect with the people!

Romney has pulled all his advertising from Michigan and Pennsylvania. And in truth, both Missouri and Arizona are probably out of reach for the President (although I heard on a phone call today tht there is still some limited optimism on Arizona). New Hampshire isn't yet out of reach for Romney, but it's close. Other than that, the map is accurate. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

If this thread is about swing states then why are we talking about Missouri and Pennsylvania? Of course I can see why Romney would pull ads in a state rather than failure. You want to shore up what you have, close the deal is what is close, and force your opponent to fight (spend time and money) in something that he should be winning in. Once you do this you shift back to the new possibilities and try to not overload the sensibilities of the public. Once both convention bounces work themselves out in a week or two then both parties know their target audiences.

The discussion is general in nature.

Of course, you want to shore up your weak sides, but so what besides the obvious?

. . . Who's going to win the election is the question?

If this thread is about swing states then why are we talking about Missouri and Pennsylvania? Of course I can see why Romney would pull ads in a state rather than failure. You want to shore up what you have, close the deal is what is close, and force your opponent to fight (spend time and money) in something that he should be winning in. Once you do this you shift back to the new possibilities and try to not overload the sensibilities of the public. Once both convention bounces work themselves out in a week or two then both parties know their target audiences. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Good comebacks!

All that time to say nothing but "I got caught but I'll pretend I didn't".

What ever you say douche-bag, whatever you say.

You should change your bag more often. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Ah! There it is -- MasterDickMuncher's infamous "douche-bag" retort. MasterDickMuncher uses it like an escape parachute when his limited cognitive abilities leave him open and exposed to intellectual ridicule. Deal with it, MasterDickMuncher, you're ignorant and failed to comprehend Yssup's post about the presidential debates.