quick visits/bngs/halfhours

I wish I could do more hour plus sessions. My problem is the narrow windows to hobby, plus it seems the closest providers are a minimum of 30 minutes away from work or home. So if I schedule a hour, it usually means a hour of drive time. If the session starts on time and it doesn't go over, looking at a minimum cover story of two hours, which is often hard to pull off.

But I would never do anything less than half hour. Anything less than that just seems weird and not worth the effort to create a cover story.
cowboy8055's Avatar
QS's and bng's have no appeal to me. I much prefer GFE's for an hour. With VP's a QS doesn't make much sense. There's a decent chance you'll have to provide ref's or get screened unless you've seen her before. I'm not going to do that for a quick date. But if I'm repeating with someone it's because I enjoy the gal and will want to spend more than 15 mins with her. QS's can be a good option for unknowns on BP since you don't know what you're gonna get.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 05-02-2017, 10:04 AM
I will agree with the 1 hr is a minimum. Usually I prefer to save up for 2-3 hrs with the right lady, and over-nights on repeat dates when I can make them work.
Ok my question is

ladies...what constitutes and defines
bng
quick visit
halfhour

And if the gent does not "nut" or "gets full satisfaction"........... how do you end the session and have them leave??


Guys....what is the draw of
a 10 or 15 minute blowjob..........{My SO says it would not be worth his effort to take a shower & prepare to drive over for that short of a time}

{not saying these sessions are a bad thing...each gal has a right to do whatever kind of session she wants to do.......just a curious observation}
Originally Posted by DallasRain
It's the client's dime on requests..Many hookers will accommodate paying clients requests. All hookers want longer paid sessions make more money.All levels hookers trying to make a living in this business.
So, after I wrote this, I realized how irrelevant it is to the op... but it seems others have expanded on the topic a bit, so here goes... Personally, I can't see the point in meeting for less than 2hrs. I like to get to know the person I am with, and that cannot be done well in 15 or 30min... really not even an hour. Not to mention, shorter visits require watching the clock. Yuck! I suppose for those who are simply looking to get off that might work, but that's not the type of session I seek to offer. Also, I am far to vanilla bcd to keep up with what I see so many of the gents here seeking in those shorter visits. And Frankly, too old to be worth much of anything in such a short time frame anyway, lol. I realize I'm probably boxing myself into a corner here, but eh, that's ok...
It's the client's dime on requests..Many hookers will accommodate paying clients requests. All hookers want longer paid sessions make more money.All levels hookers trying to make a living in this business. Originally Posted by Fancylady
FL, I cannot say I agree with this. I know of MANY ladies who do prefer the short visits for various reasons. A lady who performs many short visits tends to make more $$ than the one who does a few longer ones in the same amount of time. Also, some people (on both sides of the fence) are uncomfortable with the social aspect. For those people, the shorter visits prevail.
Gotyour6's Avatar
Half hour means a 15 minute drive there, fuck for about 20 minutes, 15 minute drive there with 15 minute undress, redress time.
I could understand and see BOTH sides of this.. I mean... Yes sometimes time might be an issue.. Or What if they are meeting a "new" person for the first time. I had an encounter like this where we agreed to a QV and IF I liked I could go longer. After meeting her Im glad i only had the QV and not longer. 1.Pictures didnt look like her or were from way previous years 2. Skills were not up to par. So I guess it depends....
pyramider's Avatar
I need my 58 minutes of nap time after my two minutes of intense action.
joesmo888's Avatar
there was a provider in my old stomping grounds who was very average having sex with, but was the ABSOLUTE best at giving a BBBJ to completion, nobody ever came close to what she could do. sex was 3/10.. her BJ's were 10/10

she would offer BNG for much cheaper than the hourly rate.

so in that case I pay less money for an experience that I cannot get anywhere else. that is the advantage of it.

i wouldn't book a quickie with someone who i enjoyed spending a full hour with
Hobby Jon's Avatar
I'm getting to the point where an hour often feels rushed! LOL! ;-) Originally Posted by Debra Hollander
Intriguing if you're ever in Dallas.....
DallasRain's Avatar
I do prefer the longer visits,it makes a more intimate experience......but I also offer halfhours .....i am not a bng or qv kinda gal..lol....but glad there are girls that do..there is a market for all
I prefer 30 minutes, I think qv is too short and not much connection is with the provider even though it's her job. I've had enough bp experience to dislike the qv flow and crisp that comes with that. I prefer talking, little laughing and something of the sort, little touching.

A hour seems to go on to long unless you get multiple pops but most only do 1 pop so I don't think it's really worth it.

30 is the sweet spot for me.
James1588's Avatar
So, after I wrote this, I realized how irrelevant it is to the op... but it seems others have expanded on the topic a bit, so here goes... Personally, I can't see the point in meeting for less than 2hrs. I like to get to know the person I am with, and that cannot be done well in 15 or 30min... really not even an hour. Not to mention, shorter visits require watching the clock. Yuck! I suppose for those who are simply looking to get off that might work, but that's not the type of session I seek to offer. Also, I am far to vanilla bcd to keep up with what I see so many of the gents here seeking in those shorter visits. And Frankly, too old to be worth much of anything in such a short time frame anyway, lol. I realize I'm probably boxing myself into a corner here, but eh, that's ok... Originally Posted by VegasJen
I completely agree with this. I've never booked less than two hours, except once with a FBSM-only lady, and there, the 90 minutes seemed about right. With my local "regular," we know each other quite well, and two hours feels like a natural amount of time. With a new lady, I'd really rather have three. You need enough time to take a shower at the beginning of the appointment, and to feel like you can relax and talk and get to know each other a little. I suppose some of it is my age. Maybe when I was 21, I'd have been happy to get a chance for 15 minutes' worth, but those days are gone. And, in some ways, good riddance to 'em.
myfavhobby's Avatar
One hour seems to be my “sweet spot”. I have time for a short get to know her period followed by enough time for our fun. I think I would like two hours more if I had the time in my schedule – maybe after I retire! Having said all of that, when I was younger I would have been interested in the BNG because I did not have the money for a true session and I was more interested in “getting my rocks off”.