Eastwood: Obama is 'greatest hoax' in history

In the 1970s, the 1980s, and 1990s....probably still happening.

CBJ7, none of what you posted diminishes the fact that Slick Willie had his license to practice law revoked because he lied. However, that caveat doesn't mean you should put off your plans to dive to the bottom of the ocean and keep bin Laden company.

BTW, Skylar, FactCheck.org is funded by Annenberg Public Policy Center -- a very liberal organization (check its other sponsored activities, e.g., Bill Moyer's Journal, etc.). Hence, what they deem as mere "exaggeration" others would not hesitate to call lies. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

oh, willie lied .. well then that does it.

if you have an SO do you lie about porking hookers and breaking the law while you do it?

that wasn't a gun that was put to Monica's head you idiot. Originally Posted by budman33

A gun or a dick!?! It really didn't matter: both acts are illegal per laws and/or federal regulations. Sexual liaisons between senior government personnel and junior government personal are forbidden. A mid-level manager caught doing what Slick Willie did with Lewinski would have been terminated with cause.

It certainly does refute the consensual vs non-consensual. You guys are reaching far if thats your reasoning. especially on a hooker board for fuck sakes.


If people didnt fuck their coworkers there would be a lot less marriages. But still a pointless comparison by you. HR policy varies wildly . She wanted to suck his dick, he wanted her to suck his dick, She sucked his dick. there was no predator there.

that wasn't a gun that was put to Monica's head you idiot. Originally Posted by budman33

What about Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey?

Idiot

It certainly does refute the consensual vs non-consensual. You guys are reaching far if thats your reasoning. especially on a hooker board for fuck sakes.


If people didnt fuck their coworkers there would be a lot less marriages. But still a pointless comparison by you. HR policy varies wildly . She wanted to suck his dick, he wanted her to suck his dick, She sucked his dick. there was no predator there. Originally Posted by budman33

the simpletons are oblivious to their blatant hypocrisy ... or theyre jealous Clinton did a 20 year old for free

you decide

Those women 's stories flipped over more times than they did in bed. try again please.

the simpletons are oblivious to their blatant hypocrisy ... or theyre jealous Clinton did a 20 year old for free

you decide Originally Posted by CJ7

Ok fox news. lol

and youre a fucking John on a hooker board ...whats the difference? Originally Posted by CJ7

So, you don't think there's a difference between a john and a sexual predator?

Does that mean you consider yourself to be a sexual predator?

Idiot

It certainly does refute the consensual vs non-consensual. You guys are reaching far if thats your reasoning. especially on a hooker board for fuck sakes.


If people didnt fuck their coworkers there would be a lot less marriages. But still a pointless comparison by you. HR policy varies wildly . She wanted to suck his dick, he wanted her to suck his dick, She sucked his dick. there was no predator there. Originally Posted by budman33

Those regulations were written to prevent the undue influence (the power to hire and fire) of government managers over vulnerable, subordinate government employees. Just because a women "consents" to suck the boss' dick to keep her job doesn't mean she really wants to suck the boss' dick.

It's veritable rape when women are coerced into having such "consensual" sex in order to preserve their economic position. The regulations were written to protect such women. How you can logically compare such instances of supervisor-employee coercion with P4P is unfathomable and reveals how truly misogynistic you Slick Willie defenders -- Dims -- are.

the simpletons are oblivious to their blatant hypocrisy ... or theyre jealous Clinton did a 20 year old for free

you decide Originally Posted by CJ7

Those women 's stories flipped over more times than they did in bed. try again please. Originally Posted by budman33

Both of you are misogynistic assholes.

So, you don't think there's a difference between a john and a sexual predator?

Does that mean you consider yourself to be a sexual predator?

Idiot Originally Posted by joe bloe

you called Clinton a sexual predator ... getting your dick sucked doesnt make you a sexual predator ... youre an idiot

Both of you are misogynistic assholes. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

soooooo, do you lie to the SO about fucking hookers or not?

you called Clinton a sexual predator ... getting your dick sucked doesnt make you a sexual predator ... youre an idiot Originally Posted by CJ7

No, but raping Juanita Broaddrick, molesting Kathleen Willey and exposing himself to Paula Jones, a complete stranger, does.

you called Clinton a sexual predator ... getting your dick sucked doesnt make you a sexual predator ... youre an idiot Originally Posted by CJ7

Coercing women [NOTE: plural] to suck his dick while causing them fear for their jobs if they don't makes Slick Willie the epitome of a sexual predator.