FBI General Counsel James Baker says...it took "less than a day" to determine the russian collusion was BOGUS and was pushed by hellary's campaign against Trump.

He's running out for straws to grab.Odd to be a suckup for the disinformation from CNN and he links an article from the DISINFORMATION SOURCE on this PROVEN pile of horseshit when he SAYS he's a "Librarian".
That's probably"DISINFORMATION" on his part..where is the disinformation board when you need it!!
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Dunno about all birds, but turkeys seem to get pretty excited when they see the farmer coming with an axe before Thanksgiving or what ever the cancel culture crowd calls it now. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
i hear they want to rename Thanksgiving to "White Privilege" Day and PETA is demanding the traditional feast be changed to Tofu and sea kelp.



bahahahahhaaaa
... And they're coming after George Washington also.

Gonna take his name OFF the college there.
Prolly take his name off of DC... Call it "Shitbox, DC."

Might even take his face off the one dollar bill.

Maybe put put OBama's face or Bill Clinton's face on the
dollar bill - 'cause it aint worth much anymore.

And they could put Hillary's face on the three dollar bill!

#### Salty
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-20-2022, 05:30 PM
... And they're coming after George Washington also.

Gonna take his name OFF the college there.
Prolly take his name off of DC... Call it "Shitbox, DC."

Might even take his face off the one dollar bill.

Maybe put put OBama's face or Bill Clinton's face on the
dollar bill - 'cause it aint worth much anymore.

And they could put Hillary's face on the three dollar bill!

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
They need to take your face outta Trumps ass...
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-20-2022, 05:32 PM
He's running out for straws to grab.Odd to be a suckup for the disinformation from CNN and he links an article from the DISINFORMATION SOURCE on this PROVEN pile of horseshit when he SAYS he's a "Librarian".
That's probably"DISINFORMATION" on his part..where is the disinformation board when you need it!! Originally Posted by bb1961
It is from the transcript of the trial dipshit.

It doesn't matter the fucking news source.

The fucking source is the court reporter.
It is from the transcript of the trial dipshit.

It doesn't matter the fucking news source.

The fucking source is the court reporter. Originally Posted by WTF
msn
powered by Microsoft News

Your "source" conveniently left this out about mook the kook. This from MSN TODAY...no wondering why your nose is so far up hellary's ass you liberaltarian monkey ass bitch

On Friday, Hillary Clinton's former campaign manager Robby Mook testified that the then-Democratic presidential nominee approved the release of information about Russia's Alfa Bank in 2016, even though officials were not "totally confident" about its legitimacy.

At the time, senior policy adviser Jake Sullivan released a statement from Clinton's campaign saying, "This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow. Computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank."

Mook was called to the stand on Friday by Sussman's defense. Sussman, Clinton's former campaign lawyer, is standing trial for allegedly lying to the FBI about his motives in informing the bureau about possible computer contacts between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has Kremlin ties and is one of the most powerful financial institutions in Russia.

The case is focused on whether Sussman tried to conceal his ties to Clinton to avoid seeming as if he was bringing the information to the FBI for partisan reasons. Sussman has pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Under cross-examination, Mook said that the information had been handed down from "people that had expertise in this sort of matter" and that he hoped by sharing it with a reporter it could be determined if the information was "accurate" or substantive."

The former campaign manager said he couldn't recall whether he asked Clinton about signing off on the allegations about Trump and Russia before or after the information was shared with the media. "All I remember is that she agreed with the decision," Mook said.

Speaking generally about the Russian collusion allegations, Mook said, "We thought this was highly suspect, and, if it was true, we wanted the American public to know about it for sure." He added that the campaign had not thought the allegations would become a "silver bullet."

Trump has repeatedly referred to special counsel Robert Mueller's probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, among other investigations, as a "witch hunt." Investigators were looking into whether Trump's campaign colluded with Russian agents to influence the 2016 election, but Mueller found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy.

"The single greatest Witch Hunt in American history continues. There was no collusion, everybody including the Dems knows there was no collusion, & yet on and on it goes. Russia & the world is laughing at the stupidity they are witnessing. Republicans should finally take control!" the former president tweeted in 2018.

Twitter users were quick to react to Mook's comments, suggesting that he had effectively ended his career by revealing the information about Clinton. Others hinted he might be targeted by the Clinton camp.

"Condolences to the Mook family on his impending suicide," one user tweeted.

"Robby Mook just spilled the beans on Hillary during the Michael Sussman trial. Prayers for Robby!" another wrote.

"We're going to get out ahead of this and say: Robby Mook didn't kill himself," conservative strategist firm X Strategies tweeted.

In a separate case, Trump is suing Clinton in a defamation lawsuit concerning the collusion claims. Clinton's attorneys have argued that the statute of limitations on the former president's claims has expired.

Newsweek reached out to Trump's office for comment.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
It is from the transcript of the trial dipshit.

It doesn't matter the fucking news source.

The fucking source is the court reporter. Originally Posted by WTF

what do you think it says?
I just showed him that mook the kook is falling on the sword...with the clinton gang his days might be numbered!!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Truly stupid. This idiot is still after the Clintons. They ought. To be
Looking for those 3,000,000 votes she beat Trump by. She’d do it again. So will Biden, if he lives that long. Angry mouth breathers spread COVID.

That’s why the incredible husk is on ignore.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-20-2022, 06:49 PM
I just showed him that mook the kook is falling on the sword...with the clinton gang his days might be numbered!! Originally Posted by bb1961
Did you even read what you posted?

How is that going to hurt Clinton?

From a legal standpoint...it is a Zero.

From a political standpoint...another Zero. Clinton isn't running for anything.

Again...I do not think most of you Trump lovers understand that the Steele dossier was not the impetus of the Trump investigation.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-20-2022, 06:53 PM
Jesus...if any of you had followed the trial so far you'd know that Sussman hiding the fact has to have had a material effect on the investigation....and agents have already testified that they still would have checked it out.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Sussman on the stand ...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KekChFdIe00


bahahahahaaaaa
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-20-2022, 06:58 PM
"...The FBI was "wary of being played" and was "very wary of being sucked into that kind effort," Baker said, explaining why he would've liked to know if Sussmann came on Clinton's behalf.
Did the alleged lie even matter?
To win a conviction, Durham must convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann lied to Baker, and that the lie was "material" enough to influence the FBI's actions or decisions.
If Sussmann told Baker during the meeting that he was representing Clinton, Baker said he "would have asked more questions," and may have brought in the FBI agents who handled the Clinton email investigation, or the agents who were handling the early Trump-Russia probe.
This testimony might help undo some of the damage from FBI agent Scott Hellmann, who performed the initial technical analysis of Sussmann's tip, and earlier testified that he wouldn't have done anything differently about the data if he had known it originated from a partisan source..."
bambino's Avatar
I knew Poofter and Aunt Peg were stupid. But they lower the bar everyday.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
"...The FBI was "wary of being played" and was "very wary of being sucked into that kind effort," Baker said, explaining why he would've liked to know if Sussmann came on Clinton's behalf.


what you see


Did the alleged lie even matter?
To win a conviction, Durham must convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann lied to Baker, and that the lie was "material" enough to influence the FBI's actions or decisions.


what i see


If Sussmann told Baker during the meeting that he was representing Clinton, Baker said he "would have asked more questions," and may have brought in the FBI agents who handled the Clinton email investigation, or the agents who were handling the early Trump-Russia probe.


This testimony might help undo some of the damage from FBI agent Scott Hellmann, who performed the initial technical analysis of Sussmann's tip, and earlier testified that he wouldn't have done anything differently about the data if he had known it originated from a partisan source..." Originally Posted by WTF

how predictable. you never disappoint professor poofter