Support Slave G with an AVATAR up grade!

I would guess he's referring to Slave disclosing Savak's particular fetish. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

She actually posted more than that in regards to Savak..... A few threads back.

So... How do I shrink this to be my Avatar?

Attachment 298694

She actually posted more than that in regards to Savak..... A few threads back. ] Originally Posted by Whispers

And yet, she wasn't banned a few threads back.

And yet, she wasn't banned a few threads back. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Nope.... But we never know the reasoning do we.... She could have been given points....

There are no less than a few dozen posts where she is rather venomous in her words throwing around insults that are are all point-able offenses. Maybe she simply accumulated enough points to earn a 90 day Ban.

I would guess he's referring to Slave disclosing Savak's particular fetish. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

You mean like he did? Note, the content below is from the public part of the review, not PA Content.

Date: 01/19/13

Activities: DFK, LFK, BITING, CHOKING/STRANGULATION, FLOGGING(me and her), slapping (a little bit), BLS, BBBJ, DT, AWESOME SAUCE, DATY, FIV, FUHA, WIN, Art of the Piercing Void (Greek), MISH-GREEK, K9-GREEK, PWNAGE, CG, Dark Love(BDSM), DOM/SUB experimentation and a valued Education in BDSM. Originally Posted by savak

You mean like he did? Note, the content below is from the public part of the review, not PA Content. Originally Posted by Netx9

You are smarter than this man... Oh... maybe not.... what she posted was far more specific than anything seen there.

I understand that SG has lots of supporters around here, but I fail to comprehend how her supporters don't see that she had blown a minor topic out of proportion.

Started with Ricky pointing out the dog picture Savak posted was too similar to SG's. Savak pointed out SG had mentioned other details more revealing to her personal life. Since then, SG has set out on a crusade against Savak for bringing up the issue of her illness.

Without quoting each post and going into details, it's pretty apparent that SG defended herself on some false premise/false perceived attack on her......at least until she escalated it to a point where Savak and Whispers had to respond in kind.

It is good that you people want to show support for SG, but I'd be wary of encouraging her to go down the path she was taking. Is it truly in her best interest? We all have our ego get the better of us at times. I don't feel I can garner the same respect for the board persona SG portrays on here until I see an apology.

Nope.... But we never know the reasoning do we.... She could have been given points....

There are no less than a few dozen posts where she is rather venomous in her words throwing around insults that are are all point-able offenses. Maybe she simply accumulated enough points to earn a 90 day Ban. Originally Posted by Whispers

30 day ban for divulging ML Intel. Why can't someone give me a link and post number?

I understand that SG has lots of supporters around here, but I fail to comprehend how her supporters don't see that she had blown a minor topic out of proportion.

Started with Ricky pointing out the dog picture Savak posted was too similar to SG's. Savak pointed out SG had mentioned other details more revealing to her personal life. Since then, SG has set out on a crusade against Savak for bringing up the issue of her illness.

Without quoting each post and going into details, it's pretty apparent that SG defended herself on some false premise/false perceived attack on her......at least until she escalated it to a point where Savak and Whispers had to respond in kind.

It is good that you people want to show support for SG, but I'd be wary of encouraging her to go down the path she was taking. Is it truly in her best interest? We all have our ego get the better of us at times. I don't feel I can garner the same respect for the board persona SG portrays on here until I see an apology. Originally Posted by Beagle

Beagle - I respect you and your thoughts. On this you're dead WRONG. Savak got pissed over the dog picture and blamed Rick and SG - and then went off on SG for not putting a leash on Rick - as if she had any control over him. Then Whispers puts his ignorant take on her health issues and the orgy - as if any of that was his business and everything blows up. No, I'm sorry SG doesn't owe an apology to ignorant fucktards that stick their noses where they don't belong.

30 day ban for divulging ML Intel. Why can't someone give me a link and post number? Originally Posted by Still Looking

How would you know how many days the ban might be?

Maybe he's clairvoyant

Maybe he asked her...?

Not all people post their points in public

Maybe he asked her...? Originally Posted by Netx9

If he did "ask her" and the 30days is correct, he has revealed private content that only SG is able to disclose. SG can disclose her infraction history as she sees fit upon her return. If SL did it, he knows what should come next......ijs

If he did "ask her" and the 30days is correct, he has revealed private content that only SG is able to disclose. SG can disclose her infraction history as she sees fit upon her return. If SL did it, he knows what should come next......ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter

Maybe he's just speculating as to why... If you have proof, rtm it, I guess. Not sure what guideline, though...

Fortunately, unlike you I do know the guidelines.

Maybe SL is talking out of his ass and mouth at the same time. He will have to decide.

He can dance the Texas Two Step, and just be another potty mouth........I'm good with that.

.........and you fucktards may want to rethinck this whole "support-a-whore" avatar concept........check out notanewbie's avatar if you are slow on the up take.......ijs