For the men. If you could provide, would you? How would you? If you were a woman what kind of hoe would you be?

In addition to just being a male provider...
How many would offer to be either a sub or dom?
(No, I'm not into that kind of fetish, but some are. Just asking...) Originally Posted by TemptationTammie

As a client I have little interest in the BDSM side of things. For me there is a thin line between erotic encounter and prop comedy once you introduce gimp masks and riding crops.

As a (theoretical) provider I wouldn't seek it out, but if in the course of things it happened in a manner I was comfortable with, I could see myself cuffing a client to a St. Andrew's cross and belittling them till I got bored. But I doubt I would ever trust a stranger to restrain me.

I think some misuderstood. My fault. I am asking the men, if they were a woman would they provide?

Bob gets an A on his term paper!! Kudos

GREAT Responses so far....keep em' rollin'!!!

I think some misuderstood. My fault. I am asking the men, if they were a woman would they provide? Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

Bob gets an A on his term paper!! Kudos

GREAT Responses so far....keep em' rollin'!!! Originally Posted by Scarlett De Rossi

Ohh I did misunderstand the question. but the answer is still pretty much the same.

thanks for the A, it was a bit of a thought provoking question. the ol' brain is still rolling around the idea.

I would find a nice quiet, secure ll where I could provide private surfing lessons to a very select set of well-screened ladies who appreciate that former bugle players have tremendous lip and tongue control and dexterity.

I would provide discounts for return clients in that I receive as much pleasure from my sessions as I provide.

PMS would be most welcome and we could discuss how to set up a private forum on eccie to discuss the finer points of surfing ladies' waves of pleasure.

The Surf and BugleBoy are up for just about anything. Originally Posted by BugleBoy

You sound like a good hoe in the making, lol! Jk
Do you need representation?!
So, Claire and I (The PMS) would be invited?!! I dig it!

You must come to church sometimes too. It's good for the provider sister soul!!

I misunderstood also...

Didn't even get a grade. I imagined Ms. De Rossi just wading up my page in front of the whole class and throwing it in the trash.

I will revise and try again...

Yeah, you just want to imagine me as your Teacher, lol!!

Lomardi, come see me after class. We need to have a serious talk over this essay!

I don't think if I was a woman I would have time to provide let alone do anything, I would be too busy playing with myself...

I'd be low volume and totally ignore the CHEAP BASTARD BITCHES!

If'n Ah were a filly, thar ain't no way Ah could be a hooger. Granted, thar's sum fellers like meh that are rught sexy and gots plenty o' game, thet Ah culdn't believe Ah wuz gettin' paid ta hump. But thar's too many smelly, ugly muthafuckahs out thar, an' plenty o' them thet thank thar shit don't stank whar I'd be werkin' way too hard fer e'ery last penny. An' then thar's some creepy mofo's Ah wuldn't do fer any 'mount o' Benjamins. Ah might be willin' ta work in a jack shack 'r a peepshow, though. Thet way Ah culd keep mah distance an' let tha creepy mofo's do all the werk they own durn selves.

I think I would....

Clients: I would probably see 3, 4 at the max clients a week, be somewhat selective and would give special discounts to individuals that I clicked with and had fun with.

Services: I would carve out my own niche and would be a FBSM/GFE since that is not as common. They would have the choice of massaging me and an extended time allotment if they did.

Pricing: I would have my pricing just slightly below market average and would provide creative discounts.

Facilities: I would either get with two or three other providers to chip in on a nice, clean and discreet incall location, and would eventually use the money from my business to either lease my own incall or buy an investment property

I would be able to afford to be limited because I would not have this as my only means of income. This would be a 2nd job if you will and a way for me to enjoy myself. That is why I would be selective and wouldn't bother with all the bullshit from guys who whine about me not seeing them or my limited availability.

I would also have a NBA policy. Just kidding.....

Ah...no. And really, I couldn't be a woman. I like sex way too much, but intimate relationships not at all. A woman can be a professional, but then she'll end up hooking up with all sorts of dudes, not just the ones she personally finds attractive, or that bathe regularly. Even if I wanted to create the illusion of passion, I have a low tolerance for rudeness, which is why I've always worked as either a laborer or in an office. Service industries require a tolerance for poorly raised asshats that fate did not see fit to allot me. A woman can be promiscuous as a civvie, but then she'll run into slut-shaming, which, even if she's thick-skinned, has real material consequences in areas such as employability and the tendency of a not insubstantial fraction of other women to harass, stalk, defame, openly threaten and otherwise target promiscuous women. And that's not even counting the irrational sexism and double-standards that mostly favor men (though occasionally the other way around). Misogyny is very much alive and thriving in our culture while misandry, with a few notable exceptions, remains mostly individual and non-systemic.

As for BDSM, I did try something like it once with a civilian girlfriend. We didn't do the whole tied-up thing, but we borrowed the outfits and riding crops and clips and a few other implements from her best friend. Sadly, we didn't get a whole lot of kinky play in because neither of us could stop laughing at how ridiculous we looked. While I'll admit to being a little dominant in the sack, the whole slave/master thing just seems really contrived to me. Perhaps I lack the right kind of imagination to get properly into it. I can't say I'd rule it out altogether, but it would take a lot of trust before I'd let anyone tie me up. I don't see myself trusting a professional acquaintance to that extent, especially in light of certain recent events.

I'd be low volume and totally ignore the CHEAP BASTARD BITCHES! Originally Posted by Still Looking

Still Looking & Low Volume should never be in the same sentence together ever again.....

ok.... i don't mean this to be ugly but it will probably sound that way. i
I'm trusting the OP will know what I mean.

Professionally and personally i care about my image in the real world. Assuming i would have the same values I don't believe I would assume the risk of being a provider.

Men can fuck all they want and it gets little attention. In some circes it yields admiration and envy. A woman with my sex life and number of partners over the years is seen as a slut or a whore. I would not want to deal with socity labeling me as such.

I think as a small segment of society we look at things differently.

Or i might cater exclusively to bicurious women. A solid business plan with lots of specials and packages

This is the attitude I hate in men who take part in this. I know it isn't meant to be hateful and it's just a part of the way that you think. It really hits at the heart of something I consider to be most annoying about this hobby, men who still, despite all of this, consider women to be cartons of milk that can be used up. I have absolutely no problem with men who are as sexually free and take part in this. But to do so otherwise is emotional abuse. Abuse being defined as something you feel is wrong, yet you do it anyway. Involving yourself in something in which you believe is wrong is complicit. I see nothing wrong with this and have never associated my value with how many I have slept with.

"Society" as a whole makes lots of mistakes and it is the courage of individuals which pushes the boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not and that is what actually creates "society". I have always contended that this is a very feminist thing to do and for this reason. For most of history and "society" a woman's value has been associated with her sexuality, with the emphasis on sexual purity. I consider this to be a reappropriating act. That is, a taking back of my sexuality in some ways. I was the same woman before I started doing this and will remain the same woman long after. the amount of men I sleep with does not affect my value, at all. That was a very deep understanding for me at a very young age, long before I had racked up any numbers at all. Men don't affect my value. They don't. At least not in my mind. "Society", is just made up of people, and it never changes unless those same people are strong enough to say, "this is bullshit". Society once condoned slavery, once made rationalizations for the annihilation of a whole race. "Society" condones lots of things that are beyond reason. that attitude is bullshit and your inability or just non desire to fight is more indicative of what you think than "society". I remember questioning my mother about why a woman could not be president when I was ten. As you can imagine, I got lots of answers, all of them just as unreasonable in their own ways. What I was pushing up against was not the limits of "society" but the limits of what she could imagine and what she felt was appropriate for women. Society is not actually a thing. It's just us and what we agree is acceptable. That can always be changed. Takes courage to change it though.