In a better world the client and provider would resolve the issue and turn the no into a yes . . . Originally Posted by Bob McVStill waiting . . . ever the patient one . . . thanks for the feedback.
I support this choice, and line of logic. However the counter argument is if you have ever based booking (or not booking) with someone based on reviews; then do you owe it to the community to risk fallout, to add to the data collection you have used? Originally Posted by Bob McVAbsolutely. And I do. Just because I only review providers I can in good conscience recommend to others doesn't mean I'm uncritical. My goal is to let the reader know what to expect so they can decide for themselves. Since this is how I use reviews, I see no hypocrisy in it.
In a better world the client and provider would resolve the issue and turn the no into a yes, but I see that rarely happening here. W3hich is kind of a shame. Short sightedness on both sides just make both people look bad. Originally Posted by Bob McVI couldn't agree more. Occasionally I'll read a no review where it's evident from the TCB portion of the ROS that the reviewer was having a bad day and fulfilled his own prophecy. More often the provider was simply bad news. But most often I wind up reading a tale of woe resulting from one or both simply being off their game. This ECCIE Epic Tragedy is usually the explanation for one or two no reviews of a provider with dozens of glowing yes reviews. Once in a blue moon I'll hear of two adults sorting out a pear-shaped rendezvous and living happily ever after. If only it were the norm.
As well as NCNS Originally Posted by TemptationTammieNSNS "reviews" will get punted to the co-ed forum, and writing alerts on NCNS seems to be frowned upon. Perhaps we need a dedicated NCNS forum. I know NCNS is my biggest pet peeve - at least let me know you're blowing me off instead of blowing me so I can use the time for something else - but I wouldn't totally write a provider off for it since even the most professional pros have days where nothing goes right.
NSNS "reviews" will get punted to the co-ed forum, and writing alerts on NCNS seems to be frowned upon. Perhaps we need a dedicated NCNS forum. I know NCNS is my biggest pet peeve Originally Posted by CentaurEven though NCNS are moved to Co-Ed, they are still available for view if you search the Hobbiest or Providers by name. Which is of great help when screening prospective clients, and I imagine, of great help when selecting a Lady to spend time with.
Provider POVJust curious, with all due respect, if you use and only see P411 clients then why are you hanging out around here? I had someone tell me last night the basic same thing, then found her advertising on BP. When questioned about were to see reviews she said go to P411 because ECCIE was a scam. Again, I don't get it.
* me personally I only use and see P411 clients I can see all his okays right away KINDA LIKE HIS REVIEWS Originally Posted by Annika
I'm curious . . . when you vet us gentlemen . . . does seeing that we gave one or more NO reviews adjust your thinking? Does just one NO review make a difference? If every fourth review is negative . . . would that put you off? Do any of you say to yourself "He's got a NO review . . . I'd never see him."? Originally Posted by OaferNo reviews wont get you on my DNS list but I will ask why she got a no..To avoid possibly doing the same thing (a no can be for many reasons)
Just curious, with all due respect, if you use and only see P411 clients then why are you hanging out around here? I had someone tell me last night the basic same thing, then found her advertising on BP. When questioned about were to see reviews she said go to P411 because ECCIE was a scam. Again, I don't get it. Originally Posted by oneiI advertise many places but generally I only accept p411 for appt verification
I advertise many places but generally I only accept p411 for appt verificationLadies and gentlemen - please take note of this classy, tactful and direct response to an honest question. After posting I thought my question could easily been read in a manner not intended. I like your final line as it shows confidence and the fact that it is preceded by a simple and precise response makes it even better. Best to you and have a great day.
* it's safer and much easier less emails back and forth *
Reviews are on here so I participate when I have time to do so!
I do sometimes/rarely maybe twice a year see very well known Board members from eccie with 10 or more reviews but those guys are usually on p411 already
I will only make the acception for persistent hobbyist I feel deserve to experience the hottest mouth they have ever had Originally Posted by Annika
To each her own some need more privacy than others Originally Posted by AnnikaTrue, and if a provider has a no review policy, she should make it known before scheduling. And, baring something alert worthy that effects others' safety, the hobbyist should honor that tacit agreement if he goes ahead. Alas, we do not live in a world where everyone does what they should. Personally, I would factor it in along with everything else when making my decision, but it would certainly make me even more cautious than I already normally am.
But the men have a section just for them they can share stuff in so I'd say just do your homework Originally Posted by AnnikaThe ML is not exactly Fort Knox.
I am NOT saying don't write the "no" review but communication is always key! Originally Posted by Lolabrea01Words to live by.