h.c vs. bengazee.....

If everyone knows what happened at Benghazi why are there still investigating it? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

To embarrass the people who can't admit the truth.
They can't handle the truth!

Well Republicans are like that. LOL

For Munchie, there are some people who will never take a straight answer if it fails to meet what they want to hear. You are one of them. A paper trail, a confession, a video will never satisfy you if you want to think that Hillary and Obama performed at the hightest levels of competence then you will continue to do so.

For Eva, you almost asked an intelligent question. I would put this in the same category as trying to prosecute Al Capone or John Gotti. You know their guilty but you really can't seem to get a jury to agree for whatever reason. You don't give up. You keep trying to build a case that a jury will accept (or in this case the American people). I will disagree that EVERYONE knows what happened in Benghazi. There are polls that so that many people have no idea what happened because they fell victim to the mainstream media which never really covered what happened. Want to argue that point? Compare the coverage of Benghazi to the coverage of the Malaysian airliner and tell me that they are even close to being the same. Or compare it to the coverage of the Ukrainian crisis or the New Jersey bridge crisis.

For Munchie, there are some people who will never take a straight answer if it fails to meet what they want to hear. You are one of them. A paper trail, a confession, a video will never satisfy you if you want to think that Hillary and Obama performed at the hightest levels of competence then you will continue to do so.

For Eva, you almost asked an intelligent question. I would put this in the same category as trying to prosecute Al Capone or John Gotti. You know their guilty but you really can't seem to get a jury to agree for whatever reason. You don't give up. You keep trying to build a case that a jury will accept (or in this case the American people). I will disagree that EVERYONE knows what happened in Benghazi. There are polls that so that many people have no idea what happened because they fell victim to the mainstream media which never really covered what happened. Want to argue that point? Compare the coverage of Benghazi to the coverage of the Malaysian airliner and tell me that they are even close to being the same. Or compare it to the coverage of the Ukrainian crisis or the New Jersey bridge crisis. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Fuck off you egotistical fucktard. You almost say something worthwhile sometimes. That is almost.

If everyone knows what happened at Benghazi why are there still investigating it? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Because those that are responsible area still carrying out business as usual.
I will refresh your memory.

The country of Lybia went through a turmoil where a dictator was overthrown. As it turned out, the people who ended up in charge have very strong ties to The Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist organizations. They hate anything American.

As the dust settled, we sent a small diplomatic contingency to set up a embassy. The man chosen as our Ambassador, if not openly gay, was pretty much assumed to be gay by most.

Hillary Clinton and the State Dept decided that we did not want a sizeable security force in the area, lest we offend the Muslims. In the mean time, the anniversary of 9-11 was upon us, and for some reason The State Department did not see any need to beef up security, even in a place as hostile to Americans as Lybia.

Muslim Terrorist saw this, and launched a planned, well orchestrated attack upon our embassy, dragging the Ambassador through the streets after inflicting the most horrendous acts one could amagine upon his person. ( go back to the gay thing).

But, since we did not want to offend the Muslims, Mrs Clinton decided that we did not even need a strike team on stand-bye. Hours passed, and our embassy was burned, looted, and four Americans died.

The imbeciles at the White House soon discovered that they had fucked up, but instead of taking responsibility, they blamed the whole thing on film that was circulating on the Internet that mocked Islam in general.

But their own internal communications soon showed that this was all a concocted lie.

So it turns out that four Americans died because some moron thought that sending a Gay man into a Muslim hot spot was no big deal, and that having proper armed security to guard our personnel in such a hot spot was deemed offensive to the Muslims.

The people that are responsible, including Hillary Clinton, showed themselves to be totally naive about the hatred Muslims have for anything western, and showed their utter stupidity in not thinking that something just might happen on the anniversary of 9-11.

Because of this naïveté and stupidity, four Americans died.

And this is the woman that is ordained by The Democrat Party to be the next President of the United States. She quote, "took full responsibility", because she knows that being Mrs Bill Clinton makes her more or less invulnerable to any repercussions.

This is why we need hearings.

The you-tube video only had around 100 views when the attack occurred.

Because those that are responsible area still carrying out business as usual.
I will refresh your memory.

The country of Lybia went through a turmoil where a dictator was overthrown. As it turned out, the people who ended up in charge have very strong ties to The Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist organizations. They hate anything American.

As the dust settled, we sent a small diplomatic contingency to set up a embassy. The man chosen as our Ambassador, if not openly gay, was pretty much assumed to be gay by most.

Hillary Clinton and the State Dept decided that we did not want a sizeable security force in the area, lest we offend the Muslims. In the mean time, the anniversary of 9-11 was upon us, and for some reason The State Department did not see any need to beef up security, even in a place as hostile to Americans as Lybia.

Muslim Terrorist saw this, and launched a planned, well orchestrated attack upon our embassy, dragging the Ambassador through the streets after inflicting the most horrendous acts one could amagine upon his person. ( go back to the gay thing).

But, since we did not want to offend the Muslims, Mrs Clinton decided that we did not even need a strike team on stand-bye. Hours passed, and our embassy was burned, looted, and four Americans died.

The imbeciles at the White House soon discovered that they had fucked up, but instead of taking responsibility, they blamed the whole thing on film that was circulating on the Internet that mocked Islam in general.

But their own internal communications soon showed that this was all a concocted lie.

So it turns out that four Americans died because some moron thought that sending a Gay man into a Muslim hot spot was no big deal, and that having proper armed security to guard our personnel in such a hot spot was deemed offensive to the Muslims.

The people that are responsible, including Hillary Clinton, showed themselves to be totally naive about the hatred Muslims have for anything western, and showed their utter stupidity in not thinking that something just might happen on the anniversary of 9-11.

Because of this naïveté and stupidity, four Americans died.

And this is the woman that is ordained by The Democrat Party to be the next President of the United States. She quote, "took full responsibility", because she knows that being Mrs Bill Clinton makes her more or less invulnerable to any repercussions.

This is why we need hearings. Originally Posted by Jackie S

WAAAAA there have been 13 investigations 50 hearings, and Darrell Issa's is still ongoing so we need another. Gimme a break it is a election year., Who "Ordained" her ? you ?

Is this ANOTHER fucking Benghazi thread?

whirlaway....
the article was on the msn home page....google the headline or the authors for further info....if you're going to use a quote try to you the entire quote....she also actually said those who insist on politicizing the tragedy....it seems it's the right wing teapublicans are the ones trying to politicize the tragedy...
.

I don't know where Stevepar gets his information, but it is very wrong. HC has made it very clear she has NO intention to engage in Benghazi investigations...

HC WILL BE RUNNING AWAY FROM BENGHAZI QUESTIONS, NOT MEETING IT HEAD ON!!

Hillary Clinton in her upcoming book “Hard Choices” casts doubt on the motivations of Republicans who have continued to investigate the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and says she won’t be part of the “political slugfest.” Politico obtained the Benghazi chapter of the book, in which the potential presidential candidate says to her critics: “Those who insist on politicizing the tragedy will have to do so without me.” Originally Posted by Whirlaway

j.w....
if you don't have answers to the questions raised in the article that's okay....I never expect deep thinking from you....
I would ask your plans if the benfazee investigation goes nowhere and dies after a slow death....
personally I hope the right wing teapublicans do all they can to focus on this issue....don't let up....keep the pedal to the metal....if that doesn't work you can always go back to the "birthers"....

EVA believes everything he reads in the National Enquirer and Mother Jones.

and you would score a 200 on the language skills portion of the SAT.

How fucking ignorant are you, JDIdiot?

Criticize others for ignorance that pales by comparison to yours.

Your RWW, illiterate, uneducated pals would call that hypocritical. Hackneyed. What it is (and your whole online presence) is, JDIdiot, is an affront to sensibility, intelligence and education.

How dare you claim to be an educator when you can't even properly express yourself?

I guess you must be one of those "college educations are elitist" asshole Rick Santorum (google it) promoted.

Fahrenheit 451 ignorant motherfucker! You are a Neanderthal.

it looks like h.c. will meet the bengazee question head on....
what happens if she answers all the questions and the american people say we're feed up with this crap.. Originally Posted by stevepar

It's spelled "Benghazi". And your premise is based on the unlikely scenario wherein Hillary tells the truth. She doesn't, and she won't.

It's spelled "Benghazi". And your premise is based on the unlikely scenario wherein Hillary tells the truth. She doesn't, and she won't. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

She is a pathological liar.

What amazes me is why many seemingly intelligent people, many on his Site, would support such a scheming bitch.

If everyone knows what happened at Benghazi why are there still investigating it? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

To confirm how it happened, why it happened, and who was responsible.

Step #1: Review "the movie."

"H.C." has already "addressed" the ISSUES ...

1. Who cares.
2. It's my fault.

Both excerpts make excellent campaign ads for her competing Democrats with each segment followed by the 2008 "cut" of the red phone ringing in the middle of the night asking ....

...who do you want to be by the phone when the shit hits the fan?

Here is the best thing Hillary has going for herself in 2016 ...

EVA believes everything he reads in the National Enquirer and Mother Jones. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

The professor just makes shit up , and thinks it is gospel. You must be a Globe fan, and we know a foxbat.