Nice new trend in Reviews

Funny how some guys won't agree to that. They want to take them with their own camera. Hmmm...I wonder why??? Originally Posted by thathottnurse

So we can Photoshop 'em!

Without a hijack, IF the providers would learn to adjust ads to the guys using a smart phone and would put a location that makes sense in their ad subject line, NOT shit like DFW or Dallas but something like Tollway/Arapaho or 635/Preston, AND maybe hours like 10a-6p only..... Originally Posted by LazurusLong

Absolutely, and since they are the ones with the most to gain by supplying this information, it's primarily their responsibility.

Having said that, if guys want to help their fellow horndogs, adjusting their review titles to provide a few items of common interest would be an appreciated extra effort.

I don't mind hobbyists taking pictures that don't include my face. See Avatar of me and Eva Damita as an example! Also, a big thanks to the wonderful hobbyist who took the picture as well.

Now, as far as videos are concerned, well . . . only a very select few have that privilege for their own personal enjoyment. My videos can get rather, interesting. I'll leave it at that.

Then again, there are some things that I'd rather keep BCD. I'd like to keep a little bit of imagination left to the gentleman.

But then again, to some, there is nothing wrong with "showing off" the trophy room.

This little collection looks nice.

Hey Phildo & Tin Man, this is a thread about pics and videos in reviews, not how you want things titled and formatted for your phones. Start your own thread to discuss that.

Back on topic, I get the privacy thing, as well as the imagination thing. I just think it's cool that some of these girls will allow it in their reviews, and I honestly think that, for every guy it turns off, it will get 2 guys to start dialing.

Okay, back on topic.

I think the photos oftentimes backfire. More often than not, the photos are unflattering and make it less likely I'll see the woman.

Hey Phildo & Tin Man, this is a thread about pics and videos in reviews, not how you want things titled and formatted for your phones. Start your own thread to discuss that.

Back on topic, I get the privacy thing, as well as the imagination thing. I just think it's cool that some of these girls will allow it in their reviews, and I honestly think that, for every guy it turns off, it will get 2 guys to start dialing. Originally Posted by medicineman

And best believe, those 2 guys will show up to the next session with cameras too.

And best believe, those 2 guys will show up to the next session with cameras too. Originally Posted by BrownSugarBaby

Not me. No desire to take the steps necessary to insure they can't be traced back to me, and I'm not one of those guys that likes to keep trophies of his sessions.

So we can Photoshop 'em! Originally Posted by Prolongus

I found mine on a hobbyist's photobucket account once. When I agreed to let him take them he swore they were for his "own private collection". That was the end of session pics for me.

I don't mind hobbyists taking pictures that don't include my face. See Avatar of me and Eva Damita as an example! Also, a big thanks to the wonderful hobbyist who took the picture as well.

Now, as far as videos are concerned, well . . . only a very select few have that privilege for their own personal enjoyment. My videos can get rather, interesting. I'll leave it at that.

Then again, there are some things that I'd rather keep BCD. I'd like to keep a little bit of imagination left to the gentleman.

But then again, to some, there is nothing wrong with "showing off" the trophy room.

This little collection looks nice.

Originally Posted by BrownSugarBaby

Agreed! I love to keep pics BCD granted I may permit them on rare occasions.

And YES! Kudos to our Lover who took these

Thanks, Babe!

I don't care for x-rated session pics or videos too much.

I'd much prefer a tasteful session pic showing the girl casually dressed or however she would be dressed for the session. That would give me a good impression of what she would look like in session. Some of that other stuff I'd rather experience for myself.

The reviews where I have used pictures taken in session I make sure to clear the pics before posting. Clear with provider and clear extra info from pics. Can't have the lat/long included on pics. We all need to be careful with electronic data.

I agree with LA. I don't need to see x rated but tasteful pictures of how a provider looks as you would first see her can be very helpful.

The only person on this board that I have let take photos of me is Ze. And it will stay that way. Much easier to figure out how they got out when you only have one finger to point at.

He he he he

I don't want all the info in the title, phildo, just enough to determine if I need to look further. Name and location is sufficient. Leave out the crap that makes the review sound like an ad and you'd end up with more information using fewer strokes. Originally Posted by TinMan

FTFY

What, "DINNER WITH RANDY HO PRESTON AND BUSH"? That might work. Not very catchy. You have to wonder what sock puppet is writing the copy for the "how-hot-the-ho-with-oral-skillz-long-legs-and-big-titties-named-screwmehard-stopped-time-for-this-newbie", though, so I'm with ou on that.

Hey Phildo & Tin Man, this is a thread about pics and videos in reviews, not how you want things titled and formatted for your phones. Start your own thread to discuss that. Originally Posted by medicineman

WTF, elitist exclusionists with bad manners, now continuity Nazis? What's happened to this place? I thought trainwrecks were the oreder of the day around here and now order is the order of the day?

Holy fuckballs. Time for another lost ho location location location threAD? Maybe the chubby ho can enlighten us without the elitist exclusionary gateway to being found.