I'm guessing LD's more chocolate than others. Originally Posted by chicagoboyVery chocolate...
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1132991&highlight=
but that's neither here nor there.
I'm guessing LD's more chocolate than others. Originally Posted by chicagoboyVery chocolate...
jbwill, I agree that it's bullshit. But what can you do? Party on, man. Originally Posted by TransAmIt should seem obvious. TS have a greater exposure to high risk sexual activities. Doesn't mean they have stds, it's about the higher risk. Lots of anal, lots of bbbj, rimming, and ATM activities. Mix all that it, with the chance that HIV is more prevalent on the gay community and you've got a higher risk profile.
So if a woman is bisexual it's acceptable but not for a man? I've known many many providers that go FMF & MFM, so I guess that's why it didn't make sense. Originally Posted by jbwillFor the most part the reason two lesbians are acceptable whereas two men are not is a simple concept. Sexy lesbians enhance what the opposite sex desires and that's femininity whereas two guys boning doesn't enhance the desire of the opposite sex which is masculinity. That's the basic reason for the societal difference.