MASSIVE ILLEGAL VOTER FRAUD IDENTIFIED.....

If only Tea Party voters could vote....maybe you could get more Tea Party backed candidates elected!



.

eeeh buhrr... I was referring to "taking it up [COLOR="my ass" then turning around and "sucking off "my illegal alien boyfriend"... Damn... eeeh buhrr, so nasty! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

FIFY

Another classic put down by EVA. No originality, change a couple of words (to avoid try to avoid plagarism charge), and recycle someone else's work.

If only Tea Party voters could vote....maybe you could get more Tea Party backed candidates elected!



. Originally Posted by WTF

Or speak and understand English...

Or brush their teeth...

Or remember to wipe they asses at the Cracker Barrel...

Or ...

Well, you know where this is going.

http://youviewed.com/2014/10/25/wash...d-swing-races/

SPAM

Vis-à-vis JD's cited article:


Could non-citizens decide the November election?
The Washington Post, by Jesse Richman and David Earnest, October 24

"In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races....

"Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...mber-election/



An abstract on the article to appear in the journal Electoral Studies

Electoral Studies
Volume 36, December 2014, Pages 149–157

Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?
Jesse T. Richmana, Gulshan A. Chatthab, David C. Earnestb,

This study examines participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally representative sample that includes non-citizen immigrants. We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...61379414000973

Congressman Allen West lost by a narrow margin in a area rife with voter fraud. If he had won reelection he would still be a clearly defined, rising star in the GOP.

Back a decade or more, B-1 Bob Dornan lost his reelection bid to a born again hispanic and voter fraud. The Congress looked into his claims and found them valid but refused to open an official investigation.

Another classic put down by EVA. No originality, change a couple of words (to try to avoid a plagiarism charge), and recycle someone else's work. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Fuck you is that original enough for your dimaturd ass?

http://youviewed.com/2014/10/25/wash...d-swing-races/ Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

There are some "original" thoughts from Judy Barleypop.

Unlike you I never claimed these were original and I did add a link to the survey talked about to show that it was real and the results were as they claimed. 15-love, my favor.

Unlike you I never claimed these were original and I did add a link to the survey talked about to show that it was real and the results were as they claimed. 15-love, my favor. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Simple shit a FIFY is not claiming they are my original thoughts, Claiming victory as usual as most tea baggers do.

I searched and did not find any threads where you guys were upset over any of the GOP frauds.
Seems a little double standard to me.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1990104.html

http://aattp.org/comprehensive-10-ye...ts-a-gop-myth/

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/06...s-voter-fraud/

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...s-from-voting/

Time and time again it is proven that Republicans commit fraud more than Dems, yet it seems to come up every election.

Is it because they think if they are cheating then Dems must be also?

If there is a loophole in the law that is enabling the GOP to cheat; I favor closing those loopholes.


Do you support the same for Voter ID fraud?

I searched and did not find any threads where you guys were upset over any of the GOP frauds.
Seems a little double standard to me.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1990104.html

http://aattp.org/comprehensive-10-ye...ts-a-gop-myth/

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/06...s-voter-fraud/

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...s-from-voting/

Time and time again it is proven that Republicans commit fraud more than Dems, yet it seems to come up every election.

Is it because they think if they are cheating then Dems must be also? Originally Posted by slingblade

It's a factual study based on the numbers of illegals illegally (as differentiated from "cheating") voting, slingblade. You're "failure" does not change the study's findings, slingblade.

Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.